|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo One Question
I learned something ELSE today I did not know: Gus (at least) along
with the other Mercury astronauts, trained for the possibility of suit failure by inhaling air polluted "with large amounts of carbon dioxide." How does a man so trained drop dead in 23 seconds from lack of oxygen? And, if that same training was given to Gemini and/or Apollo astronauts, how can anyone in his RIGHT MIND assert Ed White did so? He was an Olympic athlete who was TIMED swimming on the bottom of a pool for more than two minutes. NASA's story has NEVER made sense tome from day one, it has made ZERO sense for the past two years, and as of today it makes even less sense. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
OK, I did my Master's in Space Studies at UND. I took a course in space
medicine and this is how it goes: if your lungs are out of oxygen, hypoxia will sent in one circulation of the blood. People that have a lung full of air can go for some time, but deprived of oxygen totally and hypoxia only takes seconds to set in. davon96720 wrote in message oups.com... I learned something ELSE today I did not know: Gus (at least) along with the other Mercury astronauts, trained for the possibility of suit failure by inhaling air polluted "with large amounts of carbon dioxide." How does a man so trained drop dead in 23 seconds from lack of oxygen? And, if that same training was given to Gemini and/or Apollo astronauts, how can anyone in his RIGHT MIND assert Ed White did so? He was an Olympic athlete who was TIMED swimming on the bottom of a pool for more than two minutes. NASA's story has NEVER made sense tome from day one, it has made ZERO sense for the past two years, and as of today it makes even less sense. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... I learned something ELSE today I did not know: Gus (at least) along with the other Mercury astronauts, trained for the possibility of suit failure by inhaling air polluted "with large amounts of carbon dioxide." With what purpose in mind? Considering one of the driving factors for respiration are CO2 monitors (which is why one can die in an O2 free atmosphere and never have an inkling they're dying) I'm not sure what the goal would be other than to recognize that a high CO2 rate drives UP respiration unless conciously controlled. Now apparently, some asthmatics end up relying more on the O2 monitors than the CO2 ones, but that's a life long thing. How does a man so trained drop dead in 23 seconds from lack of oxygen? And, if that same training was given to Gemini and/or Apollo astronauts, how can anyone in his RIGHT MIND assert Ed White did so? He was an Olympic athlete who was TIMED swimming on the bottom of a pool for more than two minutes. Most likely, he did what most folks do in that case, hyperventilated in order to clear CO2 out of his lungs, hence reducing the desire to breath. In addition, there's no CO present. In a fire, it's most likely CO IS present and CO binds favorably with hemoglobin, which means you can very quickly starve from oxygen. NASA's story has NEVER made sense tome from day one, it has made ZERO sense for the past two years, and as of today it makes even less sense. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article %R4yd.1645$Y57.1305@trnddc08,
"davon96720" wrote: OK, I did my Master's in Space Studies at UND. I took a course in space medicine and this is how it goes: if your lungs are out of oxygen, hypoxia will sent in one circulation of the blood. People that have a lung full of air can go for some time, but deprived of oxygen totally and hypoxia only takes seconds to set in. davon96720 Please don't feed the troll. This was debated extensively with LaLiar months and months ago when she first polluted this group. Others with experience in toxicology attempted to explain to her the difference between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide and how they affect metabolism and bind differently to hemoglobin, etc. Others tried to explain to her how combustion products from the interior of the AS-204 would affect and destroy lung tissue very rapidly following suit envelope and/or 02 supply loop compromise. She didn't care, just kept posting conclusory, inflammatory nonsense, making authoritative sounding statements without citing sources or naming names. In short, she proved herself a troll. During this process she falsely claimed I sent her emails, yet refuses to post them at all when challenged or even provide the headers of the message she claimed I sent her. She's a liar, plain and simple. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. "Wow! This is like saying when engineers get involved, harmonic oscillations tear apart bridges." ~Hop David http://www.angryherb.net |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
, how can anyone in his RIGHT MIND
assert Ed White did so? He was an Olympic athlete Well I just have a couple of ad hominem observations in that when one is confronted with a technical result that is counter-intuitive, it may be time to learn something rather than question anyone's sanity, and two) the caps to not make the post more persuasive. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Well, Mr. Moore, I think the purpose was the same as training scuba
divers go through, and that firefighters go through..once you become acclimated to a life-threatening situation, it reduces your need to panic and increases your body's ability to adapt. Has no one on Google known ANYONE who went through survival training in the military? The more you are accustomed to having your ability to live attacked, the better able you are to respond to it when the occasion truly IS life-threatening. THAT is the point. Now, that being said, let's go to my point on Ed White...let's say (regarding swimming) he "hyperventilated in order to clear CO2 out of his lungs." It was 16.4 seconds into the fire before Gus' suit was breached...which means until that time they were still breathing pure O2. Do you not think that, at the VERY least, Ed with his athletic training, realized the potential problem and acted accordingly by hyperventilating, "hence reducing the desire to breath[e]?" Hello, let's THINK, people. :-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:39:29 -0600, Herb Schaltegger
wrote: In short, she proved herself a troll. During this process she falsely claimed I sent her emails, yet refuses to post them at all when challenged or even provide the headers of the message she claimed I sent her. She's a liar, plain and simple. ....Herb, it's time. Enough's enough. You need to sue the stupid troll for slander, and put her in the poor house so deep in debt that she'll never be able to afford even *free* usenet access. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
davon96720 wrote: OK, I did my Master's in Space Studies at UND. Duh-hey? Pat- Jamestown, N.D. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Wasn't aware of that history.
Mele Kalikimaka, Houli Makahiki Hou davon96720 "Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message ... In article %R4yd.1645$Y57.1305@trnddc08, "davon96720" wrote: OK, I did my Master's in Space Studies at UND. I took a course in space medicine and this is how it goes: if your lungs are out of oxygen, hypoxia will sent in one circulation of the blood. People that have a lung full of air can go for some time, but deprived of oxygen totally and hypoxia only takes seconds to set in. davon96720 Please don't feed the troll. This was debated extensively with LaLiar months and months ago when she first polluted this group. Others with experience in toxicology attempted to explain to her the difference between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide and how they affect metabolism and bind differently to hemoglobin, etc. Others tried to explain to her how combustion products from the interior of the AS-204 would affect and destroy lung tissue very rapidly following suit envelope and/or 02 supply loop compromise. She didn't care, just kept posting conclusory, inflammatory nonsense, making authoritative sounding statements without citing sources or naming names. In short, she proved herself a troll. During this process she falsely claimed I sent her emails, yet refuses to post them at all when challenged or even provide the headers of the message she claimed I sent her. She's a liar, plain and simple. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. "Wow! This is like saying when engineers get involved, harmonic oscillations tear apart bridges." ~Hop David http://www.angryherb.net |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:39:29 -0600, Herb Schaltegger wrote: In short, she proved herself a troll. During this process she falsely claimed I sent her emails, yet refuses to post them at all when challenged or even provide the headers of the message she claimed I sent her. She's a liar, plain and simple. ...Herb, it's time. Enough's enough. You need to sue the stupid troll for slander, and put her in the poor house so deep in debt that she'll never be able to afford even *free* usenet access. OM Yeah, I keep thinking about it. Fortunately, I still have several months until the applicable statutes of limitation run in my state alone. However, since she's slandered me across the entire world, thanks to Usenet, under the famous Falwell v. Hustler/Flynt decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, I think I can pretty much pick and choose the forum to bring suit in whatever jurisdiction has the longest statute - I think I'll let her stew for awhile longer before deciding what to do. Heck, with luck I can stretch out her apprehension for years yet. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. "Wow! This is like saying when engineers get involved, harmonic oscillations tear apart bridges." ~Hop David http://www.angryherb.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA NTRS Server - Apollo Documents available | Rusty | History | 2 | December 17th 04 09:33 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 | Nathan Jones | Misc | 20 | November 11th 03 07:33 PM |