Where is the matter Einstein says velocity creates?

On Dec 15, 8:22*pm, NoEinstein wrote:
On Dec 14, 6:36*pm, PD wrote:



On Dec 14, 4:04*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 3:51*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 1:55*pm, PD wrote:

Folks: *Paul Draperbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting*****end_of_t he_skype_highlighting, the airhead, persona non grata, persona non
brain, has STRUCK OUT on science for over four years. *Now, he has
become a self-appointed expert on Patents. *Yet, he himself has none.
The reason he can't find anything about my major floor system
invention, is because such probably predated the computerized data
base. *I am not concerned in the least whether PD, the leach, parasite
DUNCE, considers me to be a liar. *He has never made a '+new post' on
any news group in over four years that he has pestered me. *His only
motives in life are angry, negative ones. *The only "warmth" that will
ever be directed toward PD is when he BURNS in Hell for eternity! *—
NE —

Not so, John.
1. The computerized database includes all patents since 1790 and full-
text patent reports since 1976. Unless your patent was filed before
1790....
2. I've made a significant number of new posts, regardless of your
inability to find ANYONE'S new posts other than your own.
3. You say I have pestered you for "over four years". The first time I
responded to any of your posts was February 16, 2007. You'll note that
is less than four years ago.

Ah, correction -- February 14, 2007. Still less than four years ago.

If you make three errors of fact in one short paragraph, and you do
this on top of lying about a patent you do not hold on a process or
product for which there is no public information whatsoever, then you
shoot your own credibility right in the foot, John.

You may foam and blather that I'm going to hell for not supporting you
with warmth and positivity, John, but your blatant abuse of the truth
and persistent and malicious lying is going to land you there well
ahead of me.

On Dec 13, 8:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 13, 10:45*am, PD wrote:

Folks: *PD, the PNG & PNB, is the sneaky leach who trolls the NET
seeking dirt on anyone he is jealous of. *My Plen-E-Air Slab floor
system manages to get the entire electrical and mechanical supply
services for a commercial office building floor to fit within a 12"
thick structural, poured-in-place slab. *The return air is within the
twelve inch space between the suspended ceiling and the bottom of the
structural slab. *The recessed light fixtures fit within the latter
12" space.

Conventional floor systems, such as the fated World Trade Center
Buildings used (about) 36" deep metal trusses, that had ****-poor
sprayed-on fireproofing. *The total depth, floor-to-ceiling, was about
five humongous feet of essentially wasted space. *When those planes
crashed into the buildings, the trusses got knocked sideways and the
fireproofing mostly fell off. *Structural steel exposed to high heat
will soften to the point of loosing its load carrying ability. *That's
why the two buildings pancaked to the ground.

If my Plen-E-Air Slab floor system had been used on those buildings,
the immediate cost saving would have been about 15% less (total
building!). *And there would be about a 10% increase in the leasable
floor space per building, because fewer elevators would be required to
serve the buildings (the floors would be closer together, reduces the
travel times); and the area taken up by fire stairways would be
considerably less, for the same reasons. *A more compact building
reduces the heating and cooling loads by about 15%, and cuts the cost
of the building foundations another 15%, plus making buildings more
resistant to winds and to earthquakes.

If those same planes had hit a building constructed with my Plen-E-Air
Slab, the edge-on rigidity of the floor slabs would have forced the
planes to go skidding in one side of the buildings and out the other.
Even if the full fuel load of a jet got spilled on a floor, the slabs
would still have a massive 4-hr. fire resistance. *Depending upon the
structural layout, it would be likely that one or more columns would
be knocked out. *But by the simple expedient of having "mechanical/
structural" super floors about every ten floors, it would be possible
to have all the columns be backed-up with super strong cables that
would support a slab from ABOVE if a column were to be knocked out
below. *Additionally, the sheet metal void former for my system
creates a two-way (reversible loading) capacity. *Though a slab with a
column knocked out would sag a good bit, it should not go pancaking to
the ground. *In short, the two World Trade Center buildings would both
have been back in service about seven years ago!

The above capsule description should be more informative than having
any airhead PNG, like Paul Draper, go on any pointless searches for
dirt. *— NoEinstein —

The point of the search would be to establish your credibility, John,
to see if you can discern the difference between reality and fantasy,
or to see if you're a compulsive liar. If the news is bad on either
score, you see, you will find that your ideas will not meet with much
interest, as no one wants to further the ideas of either liars or
lunatics.

There are no patents listed for either "Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-
directional voided slab", and there are no other patents than the two
previously mentioned under your name. Furthermore, a Google search for
"Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-directional voided slab" return no hits other
than the posts here in which you mentioned them.

A liar makes his own dirt, John. I have no need to dig any of it up,
when you shovel it vigorously yourself. I would not have known to
check your claims if you'd never made the false claims in the first
place.

You're in the position you find yourself, by virtue of your own slimy,
dishonest, sociopathic, delusional actions, John. You really need to
take a hard look in the mirror this afternoon and ask yourself why you
are not seeking help. I can assure you that I'm in no way jealous of a
psychotic loner.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Only someone mentally ill, like PD, would hold me responsible
for recalling when he started pestering me.

I didn't make the statement. You did. I do hold you responsible for
the truth of statements YOU make.

.. within two months out of
four years. *That two month error, for PD, suggests my
"imperfection". *I'll bet that he couldn't guess within two months
when he started pestering, me. *So, PD is the imperfect one, don't you
think. *— NE —

I didn't guess. I *checked*. That's the difference between you and me.
You GUESS and pass it off as truth. I CHECK before making a statement
I allege as truth.

Your credibility is shot because your statements are guesses,
suppositions, idle comments, even when they are about yourself. You
claim you have patents you do not have.

By the way, the three remaining patents you have in application stage
are for an oil dipstick, a clip for holding shoelaces, and a catheter
for men with prostate problems.

On Dec 16, 11:48*am, PD wrote:
On Dec 15, 8:22*pm, NoEinstein wrote:





On Dec 14, 6:36*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 4:04*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 3:51*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 1:55*pm, PD wrote:

Folks: *Paul Draperbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting*****end_of_t he_skype_highlighting, the airhead, persona non grata, persona non
brain, has STRUCK OUT on science for over four years. *Now, he has
become a self-appointed expert on Patents. *Yet, he himself has none.
The reason he can't find anything about my major floor system
invention, is because such probably predated the computerized data
base. *I am not concerned in the least whether PD, the leach, parasite
DUNCE, considers me to be a liar. *He has never made a '+new post' on
any news group in over four years that he has pestered me. *His only
motives in life are angry, negative ones. *The only "warmth" that will
ever be directed toward PD is when he BURNS in Hell for eternity! *—
NE —

Not so, John.
1. The computerized database includes all patents since 1790 and full-
text patent reports since 1976. Unless your patent was filed before
1790....
2. I've made a significant number of new posts, regardless of your
inability to find ANYONE'S new posts other than your own.
3. You say I have pestered you for "over four years". The first time I
responded to any of your posts was February 16, 2007. You'll note that
is less than four years ago.

Ah, correction -- February 14, 2007. Still less than four years ago.

If you make three errors of fact in one short paragraph, and you do
this on top of lying about a patent you do not hold on a process or
product for which there is no public information whatsoever, then you
shoot your own credibility right in the foot, John.

You may foam and blather that I'm going to hell for not supporting you
with warmth and positivity, John, but your blatant abuse of the truth
and persistent and malicious lying is going to land you there well
ahead of me.

On Dec 13, 8:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 13, 10:45*am, PD wrote:

Folks: *PD, the PNG & PNB, is the sneaky leach who trolls the NET
seeking dirt on anyone he is jealous of. *My Plen-E-Air Slab floor
system manages to get the entire electrical and mechanical supply
services for a commercial office building floor to fit within a 12"
thick structural, poured-in-place slab. *The return air is within the
twelve inch space between the suspended ceiling and the bottom of the
structural slab. *The recessed light fixtures fit within the latter
12" space.

Conventional floor systems, such as the fated World Trade Center
Buildings used (about) 36" deep metal trusses, that had ****-poor
sprayed-on fireproofing. *The total depth, floor-to-ceiling, was about
five humongous feet of essentially wasted space. *When those planes
crashed into the buildings, the trusses got knocked sideways and the
fireproofing mostly fell off. *Structural steel exposed to high heat
will soften to the point of loosing its load carrying ability.. *That's
why the two buildings pancaked to the ground.

If my Plen-E-Air Slab floor system had been used on those buildings,
the immediate cost saving would have been about 15% less (total
building!). *And there would be about a 10% increase in the leasable
floor space per building, because fewer elevators would be required to
serve the buildings (the floors would be closer together, reduces the
travel times); and the area taken up by fire stairways would be
considerably less, for the same reasons. *A more compact building
reduces the heating and cooling loads by about 15%, and cuts the cost
of the building foundations another 15%, plus making buildings more
resistant to winds and to earthquakes.

If those same planes had hit a building constructed with my Plen-E-Air
Slab, the edge-on rigidity of the floor slabs would have forced the
planes to go skidding in one side of the buildings and out the other.
Even if the full fuel load of a jet got spilled on a floor, the slabs
would still have a massive 4-hr. fire resistance. *Depending upon the
structural layout, it would be likely that one or more columns would
be knocked out. *But by the simple expedient of having "mechanical/
structural" super floors about every ten floors, it would be possible
to have all the columns be backed-up with super strong cables that
would support a slab from ABOVE if a column were to be knocked out
below. *Additionally, the sheet metal void former for my system
creates a two-way (reversible loading) capacity. *Though a slab with a
column knocked out would sag a good bit, it should not go pancaking to
the ground. *In short, the two World Trade Center buildings would both
have been back in service about seven years ago!

The above capsule description should be more informative than having
any airhead PNG, like Paul Draper, go on any pointless searches for
dirt. *— NoEinstein —

The point of the search would be to establish your credibility, John,
to see if you can discern the difference between reality and fantasy,
or to see if you're a compulsive liar. If the news is bad on either
score, you see, you will find that your ideas will not meet with much
interest, as no one wants to further the ideas of either liars or
lunatics.

There are no patents listed for either "Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-
directional voided slab", and there are no other patents than the two
previously mentioned under your name. Furthermore, a Google search for
"Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-directional voided slab" return no hits other
than the posts here in which you mentioned them.

A liar makes his own dirt, John. I have no need to dig any of it up,
when you shovel it vigorously yourself. I would not have known to
check your claims if you'd never made the false claims in the first
place.

You're in the position you find yourself, by virtue of your own slimy,
dishonest, sociopathic, delusional actions, John. You really need to
take a hard look in the mirror this afternoon and ask yourself why you
are not seeking help. I can assure you that I'm in no way jealous of a
psychotic loner.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Only someone mentally ill, like PD, would hold me responsible
for recalling when he started pestering me.

I didn't make the statement. You did. I do hold you responsible for
the truth of statements YOU make.

.. within two months out of
four years. *That two month error, for PD, suggests my
"imperfection". *I'll bet that he couldn't guess within two months
when he started pestering, me. *So, PD is the imperfect one, don't you
think. *— NE —

I didn't guess. I *checked*. That's the difference between you and me.
You GUESS and pass it off as truth. I CHECK before making a statement
I allege as truth.

Your credibility is shot because your statements are guesses,
suppositions, idle comments, even when they are about yourself. You
claim you have patents you do not have.

By the way, the three remaining patents you have in application stage
are for an oil dipstick, a clip for holding shoelaces, and a catheter
for men with prostate problems.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: Call the White Coats and get out a strait jacket! PD is
foaming-at-the-mouth... MAD that he is so SMALL in the scheme of
things! But he's still just a big couch potato, with nothing positive
about him except his being fat! Ha, ha, HA! — NoEinstein —

On Dec 17, 2:16*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Folks: It will be interesting to note how long it takes PD, the PNG &
PNB, to look-up my Monolithic Concrete Slab Construction, from the
patent number I found. PD claims I am 'senile' for not remembering a
9-digit number from decades ago, For several days he has claimed I am
a liar (sic), because he can't understand how to research older
patents. It should be obvious that PD is no gentleman when he fails
to apologize for his rude errors. If any person on this Earth knows
anything positive that PD has ever done in his life, enlighten us.
But such light is likely to be "dim" indeed. — NE —

On Dec 16, 11:48*am, PD wrote:

On Dec 15, 8:22*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 6:36*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 4:04*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 3:51*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 1:55*pm, PD wrote:

Folks: *Paul Draperbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting*****end_of_t he_skype_highlighting, the airhead, persona non grata, persona non
brain, has STRUCK OUT on science for over four years. *Now, he has
become a self-appointed expert on Patents. *Yet, he himself has none.
The reason he can't find anything about my major floor system
invention, is because such probably predated the computerized data
base. *I am not concerned in the least whether PD, the leach, parasite
DUNCE, considers me to be a liar. *He has never made a '+new post' on
any news group in over four years that he has pestered me. *His only
motives in life are angry, negative ones. *The only "warmth" that will
ever be directed toward PD is when he BURNS in Hell for eternity! *—
NE —

Not so, John.
1. The computerized database includes all patents since 1790 and full-
text patent reports since 1976. Unless your patent was filed before
1790....
2. I've made a significant number of new posts, regardless of your
inability to find ANYONE'S new posts other than your own.
3. You say I have pestered you for "over four years". The first time I
responded to any of your posts was February 16, 2007. You'll note that
is less than four years ago.

Ah, correction -- February 14, 2007. Still less than four years ago..

If you make three errors of fact in one short paragraph, and you do
this on top of lying about a patent you do not hold on a process or
product for which there is no public information whatsoever, then you
shoot your own credibility right in the foot, John.

You may foam and blather that I'm going to hell for not supporting you
with warmth and positivity, John, but your blatant abuse of the truth
and persistent and malicious lying is going to land you there well
ahead of me.

On Dec 13, 8:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 13, 10:45*am, PD wrote:

Folks: *PD, the PNG & PNB, is the sneaky leach who trolls the NET
seeking dirt on anyone he is jealous of. *My Plen-E-Air Slab floor
system manages to get the entire electrical and mechanical supply
services for a commercial office building floor to fit within a 12"
thick structural, poured-in-place slab. *The return air is within the
twelve inch space between the suspended ceiling and the bottom of the
structural slab. *The recessed light fixtures fit within the latter
12" space.

Conventional floor systems, such as the fated World Trade Center
Buildings used (about) 36" deep metal trusses, that had ****-poor
sprayed-on fireproofing. *The total depth, floor-to-ceiling, was about
five humongous feet of essentially wasted space. *When those planes
crashed into the buildings, the trusses got knocked sideways and the
fireproofing mostly fell off. *Structural steel exposed to high heat
will soften to the point of loosing its load carrying ability. *That's
why the two buildings pancaked to the ground.

If my Plen-E-Air Slab floor system had been used on those buildings,
the immediate cost saving would have been about 15% less (total
building!). *And there would be about a 10% increase in the leasable
floor space per building, because fewer elevators would be required to
serve the buildings (the floors would be closer together, reduces the
travel times); and the area taken up by fire stairways would be
considerably less, for the same reasons. *A more compact building
reduces the heating and cooling loads by about 15%, and cuts the cost
of the building foundations another 15%, plus making buildings more
resistant to winds and to earthquakes.

If those same planes had hit a building constructed with my Plen-E-Air
Slab, the edge-on rigidity of the floor slabs would have forced the
planes to go skidding in one side of the buildings and out the other.
Even if the full fuel load of a jet got spilled on a floor, the slabs
would still have a massive 4-hr. fire resistance. *Depending upon the
structural layout, it would be likely that one or more columns would
be knocked out. *But by the simple expedient of having "mechanical/
structural" super floors about every ten floors, it would be possible
to have all the columns be backed-up with super strong cables that
would support a slab from ABOVE if a column were to be knocked out
below. *Additionally, the sheet metal void former for my system
creates a two-way (reversible loading) capacity. *Though a slab with a
column knocked out would sag a good bit, it should not go pancaking to
the ground. *In short, the two World Trade Center buildings would both
have been back in service about seven years ago!

The above capsule description should be more informative than having
any airhead PNG, like Paul Draper, go on any pointless searches for
dirt. *— NoEinstein —

The point of the search would be to establish your credibility, John,
to see if you can discern the difference between reality and fantasy,
or to see if you're a compulsive liar. If the news is bad on either
score, you see, you will find that your ideas will not meet with much
interest, as no one wants to further the ideas of either liars or
lunatics.

There are no patents listed for either "Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-
directional voided slab", and there are no other patents than the two
previously mentioned under your name. Furthermore, a Google search for
"Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-directional voided slab" return no hits other
than the posts here in which you mentioned them.

A liar makes his own dirt, John. I have no need to dig any of it up,
when you shovel it vigorously yourself. I would not have known to
check your claims if you'd never made the false claims in the first
place.

You're in the position you find yourself, by virtue of your own slimy,
dishonest, sociopathic, delusional actions, John. You really need to
take a hard look in the mirror this afternoon and ask yourself why you
are not seeking help. I can assure you that I'm in no way jealous of a
psychotic loner.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Only someone mentally ill, like PD, would hold me responsible
for recalling when he started pestering me.

I didn't make the statement. You did. I do hold you responsible for
the truth of statements YOU make.

.. within two months out of
four years. *That two month error, for PD, suggests my
"imperfection". *I'll bet that he couldn't guess within two months
when he started pestering, me. *So, PD is the imperfect one, don't you
think. *— NE —

I didn't guess. I *checked*. That's the difference between you and me.
You GUESS and pass it off as truth. I CHECK before making a statement
I allege as truth.

Your credibility is shot because your statements are guesses,
suppositions, idle comments, even when they are about yourself. You
claim you have patents you do not have.

By the way, the three remaining patents you have in application stage
are for an oil dipstick, a clip for holding shoelaces, and a catheter
for men with prostate problems.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Call the White Coats and get out a strait jacket! *PD is
foaming-at-the-mouth... MAD that he is so SMALL in the scheme of
things! *But he's still just a big couch potato, with nothing positive
about him except his being fat! *Ha, ha, HA! *— NoEinstein —- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Dec 18, 7:35*pm, NoEinstein wrote:
On Dec 17, 2:16*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Folks: *It will be interesting to note how long it takes PD, the PNG &
PNB, to look-up my Monolithic Concrete Slab Construction, from the
patent number I found. *PD claims I am 'senile' for not remembering a
9-digit number from decades ago, *For several days he has claimed I am
a liar (sic), because he can't understand how to research older
patents. *It should be obvious that PD is no gentleman when he fails
to apologize for his rude errors. *If any person on this Earth knows
anything positive that PD has ever done in his life, enlighten us.
But such light is likely to be "dim" indeed. *— NE —





On Dec 16, 11:48*am, PD wrote:

On Dec 15, 8:22*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 6:36*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 4:04*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 3:51*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 1:55*pm, PD wrote:

Folks: *Paul Draperbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting*****end_of_t he_skype_highlighting, the airhead, persona non grata, persona non
brain, has STRUCK OUT on science for over four years. *Now, he has
become a self-appointed expert on Patents. *Yet, he himself has none.
The reason he can't find anything about my major floor system
invention, is because such probably predated the computerized data
base. *I am not concerned in the least whether PD, the leach, parasite
DUNCE, considers me to be a liar. *He has never made a '+new post' on
any news group in over four years that he has pestered me. *His only
motives in life are angry, negative ones. *The only "warmth" that will
ever be directed toward PD is when he BURNS in Hell for eternity! *—
NE —

Not so, John.
1. The computerized database includes all patents since 1790 and full-
text patent reports since 1976. Unless your patent was filed before
1790....
2. I've made a significant number of new posts, regardless of your
inability to find ANYONE'S new posts other than your own.
3. You say I have pestered you for "over four years". The first time I
responded to any of your posts was February 16, 2007. You'll note that
is less than four years ago.

Ah, correction -- February 14, 2007. Still less than four years ago.

If you make three errors of fact in one short paragraph, and you do
this on top of lying about a patent you do not hold on a process or
product for which there is no public information whatsoever, then you
shoot your own credibility right in the foot, John.

You may foam and blather that I'm going to hell for not supporting you
with warmth and positivity, John, but your blatant abuse of the truth
and persistent and malicious lying is going to land you there well
ahead of me.

On Dec 13, 8:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 13, 10:45*am, PD wrote:

Folks: *PD, the PNG & PNB, is the sneaky leach who trolls the NET
seeking dirt on anyone he is jealous of. *My Plen-E-Air Slab floor
system manages to get the entire electrical and mechanical supply
services for a commercial office building floor to fit within a 12"
thick structural, poured-in-place slab. *The return air is within the
twelve inch space between the suspended ceiling and the bottom of the
structural slab. *The recessed light fixtures fit within the latter
12" space.

Conventional floor systems, such as the fated World Trade Center
Buildings used (about) 36" deep metal trusses, that had ****-poor
sprayed-on fireproofing. *The total depth, floor-to-ceiling, was about
five humongous feet of essentially wasted space. *When those planes
crashed into the buildings, the trusses got knocked sideways and the
fireproofing mostly fell off. *Structural steel exposed to high heat
will soften to the point of loosing its load carrying ability. *That's
why the two buildings pancaked to the ground.

If my Plen-E-Air Slab floor system had been used on those buildings,
the immediate cost saving would have been about 15% less (total
building!). *And there would be about a 10% increase in the leasable
floor space per building, because fewer elevators would be required to
serve the buildings (the floors would be closer together, reduces the
travel times); and the area taken up by fire stairways would be
considerably less, for the same reasons. *A more compact building
reduces the heating and cooling loads by about 15%, and cuts the cost
of the building foundations another 15%, plus making buildings more
resistant to winds and to earthquakes.

If those same planes had hit a building constructed with my Plen-E-Air
Slab, the edge-on rigidity of the floor slabs would have forced the
planes to go skidding in one side of the buildings and out the other.
Even if the full fuel load of a jet got spilled on a floor, the slabs
would still have a massive 4-hr. fire resistance. *Depending upon the
structural layout, it would be likely that one or more columns would
be knocked out. *But by the simple expedient of having "mechanical/
structural" super floors about every ten floors, it would be possible
to have all the columns be backed-up with super strong cables that
would support a slab from ABOVE if a column were to be knocked out
below. *Additionally, the sheet metal void former for my system
creates a two-way (reversible loading) capacity. *Though a slab with a
column knocked out would sag a good bit, it should not go pancaking to
the ground. *In short, the two World Trade Center buildings would both
have been back in service about seven years ago!

The above capsule description should be more informative than having
any airhead PNG, like Paul Draper, go on any pointless searches for
dirt. *— NoEinstein —

The point of the search would be to establish your credibility, John,
to see if you can discern the difference between reality and fantasy,
or to see if you're a compulsive liar. If the news is bad on either
score, you see, you will find that your ideas will not meet with much
interest, as no one wants to further the ideas of either liars or
lunatics.

There are no patents listed for either "Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-
directional voided slab", and there are no other patents than the two
previously mentioned under your name. Furthermore, a Google search for
"Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-directional voided slab" return no hits other
than the posts here in which you mentioned them.

A liar makes his own dirt, John. I have no need to dig any of it up,
when you shovel it vigorously yourself. I would not have known to
check your claims if you'd never made the false claims in the first
place.

You're in the position you find yourself, by virtue of your own slimy,
dishonest, sociopathic, delusional actions, John. You really need to
take a hard look in the mirror this afternoon and ask yourself why you
are not seeking help. I can assure you that I'm in no way jealous of a
psychotic loner.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Only someone mentally ill, like PD, would hold me responsible
for recalling when he started pestering me.

I didn't make the statement. You did. I do hold you responsible for
the truth of statements YOU make.

.. within two months out of
four years. *That two month error, for PD, suggests my
"imperfection". *I'll bet that he couldn't guess within two months
when he started pestering, me. *So, PD is the imperfect one, don't you
think. *— NE —

I didn't guess. I *checked*. That's the difference between you and me..
You GUESS and pass it off as truth. I CHECK before making a statement
I allege as truth.

Your credibility is shot because your statements are guesses,
suppositions, idle comments, even when they are about yourself. You
claim you have patents you do not have.

By the way, the three remaining patents you have in application stage
are for an oil dipstick, a clip for holding shoelaces, and a catheter
for men with prostate problems.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Call the White Coats and get out a strait jacket! *PD is
foaming-at-the-mouth... MAD that he is so SMALL in the scheme of
things! *But he's still just a big couch potato, with nothing positive
about him except his being fat! *Ha, ha, HA! *— NoEinstein —- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text

...

read more »- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well... one day has passed and PD hasn't acknowledged finding my
voided slab patent. When things get hot, PD, the PNG & PNB, just
disappears. If only he would STAY gone! — NoEinstein —

On Dec 19, 5:56*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Folks: It's been over two days since I dug up the patent number on my
Monolithic Concrete Slab Construction. PD, the PNG & PNB, is usually
all over every reply that I make, anywhere. But he isn't likely to
admit he was wrong. Rude people never do. So, I'll let him fume in
his own virtue-less vacuum. — NoEinstein —

On Dec 18, 7:35*pm, NoEinstein wrote:



On Dec 17, 2:16*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Folks: *It will be interesting to note how long it takes PD, the PNG &
PNB, to look-up my Monolithic Concrete Slab Construction, from the
patent number I found. *PD claims I am 'senile' for not remembering a
9-digit number from decades ago, *For several days he has claimed I am
a liar (sic), because he can't understand how to research older
patents. *It should be obvious that PD is no gentleman when he fails
to apologize for his rude errors. *If any person on this Earth knows
anything positive that PD has ever done in his life, enlighten us.
But such light is likely to be "dim" indeed. *— NE —

On Dec 16, 11:48*am, PD wrote:

On Dec 15, 8:22*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 6:36*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 4:04*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 3:51*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 1:55*pm, PD wrote:

Folks: *Paul Draperbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting*****end_of_t he_skype_highlighting, the airhead, persona non grata, persona non
brain, has STRUCK OUT on science for over four years. *Now, he has
become a self-appointed expert on Patents. *Yet, he himself has none.
The reason he can't find anything about my major floor system
invention, is because such probably predated the computerized data
base. *I am not concerned in the least whether PD, the leach, parasite
DUNCE, considers me to be a liar. *He has never made a '+new post' on
any news group in over four years that he has pestered me. *His only
motives in life are angry, negative ones. *The only "warmth" that will
ever be directed toward PD is when he BURNS in Hell for eternity! *—
NE —

Not so, John.
1. The computerized database includes all patents since 1790 and full-
text patent reports since 1976. Unless your patent was filed before
1790....
2. I've made a significant number of new posts, regardless of your
inability to find ANYONE'S new posts other than your own.
3. You say I have pestered you for "over four years". The first time I
responded to any of your posts was February 16, 2007. You'll note that
is less than four years ago.

Ah, correction -- February 14, 2007. Still less than four years ago.

If you make three errors of fact in one short paragraph, and you do
this on top of lying about a patent you do not hold on a process or
product for which there is no public information whatsoever, then you
shoot your own credibility right in the foot, John.

You may foam and blather that I'm going to hell for not supporting you
with warmth and positivity, John, but your blatant abuse of the truth
and persistent and malicious lying is going to land you there well
ahead of me.

On Dec 13, 8:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 13, 10:45*am, PD wrote:

Folks: *PD, the PNG & PNB, is the sneaky leach who trolls the NET
seeking dirt on anyone he is jealous of. *My Plen-E-Air Slab floor
system manages to get the entire electrical and mechanical supply
services for a commercial office building floor to fit within a 12"
thick structural, poured-in-place slab. *The return air is within the
twelve inch space between the suspended ceiling and the bottom of the
structural slab. *The recessed light fixtures fit within the latter
12" space.

Conventional floor systems, such as the fated World Trade Center
Buildings used (about) 36" deep metal trusses, that had ****-poor
sprayed-on fireproofing. *The total depth, floor-to-ceiling, was about
five humongous feet of essentially wasted space. *When those planes
crashed into the buildings, the trusses got knocked sideways and the
fireproofing mostly fell off. *Structural steel exposed to high heat
will soften to the point of loosing its load carrying ability. *That's
why the two buildings pancaked to the ground.

If my Plen-E-Air Slab floor system had been used on those buildings,
the immediate cost saving would have been about 15% less (total
building!). *And there would be about a 10% increase in the leasable
floor space per building, because fewer elevators would be required to
serve the buildings (the floors would be closer together, reduces the
travel times); and the area taken up by fire stairways would be
considerably less, for the same reasons. *A more compact building
reduces the heating and cooling loads by about 15%, and cuts the cost
of the building foundations another 15%, plus making buildings more
resistant to winds and to earthquakes.

If those same planes had hit a building constructed with my Plen-E-Air
Slab, the edge-on rigidity of the floor slabs would have forced the
planes to go skidding in one side of the buildings and out the other.
Even if the full fuel load of a jet got spilled on a floor, the slabs
would still have a massive 4-hr. fire resistance. *Depending upon the
structural layout, it would be likely that one or more columns would
be knocked out. *But by the simple expedient of having "mechanical/
structural" super floors about every ten floors, it would be possible
to have all the columns be backed-up with super strong cables that
would support a slab from ABOVE if a column were to be knocked out
below. *Additionally, the sheet metal void former for my system
creates a two-way (reversible loading) capacity. *Though a slab with a
column knocked out would sag a good bit, it should not go pancaking to
the ground. *In short, the two World Trade Center buildings would both
have been back in service about seven years ago!

The above capsule description should be more informative than having
any airhead PNG, like Paul Draper, go on any pointless searches for
dirt. *— NoEinstein —

The point of the search would be to establish your credibility, John,
to see if you can discern the difference between reality and fantasy,
or to see if you're a compulsive liar. If the news is bad on either
score, you see, you will find that your ideas will not meet with much
interest, as no one wants to further the ideas of either liars or
lunatics.

There are no patents listed for either "Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-
directional voided slab", and there are no other patents than the two
previously mentioned under your name. Furthermore, a Google search for
"Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-directional voided slab" return no hits other
than the posts here in which you mentioned them.

A liar makes his own dirt, John. I have no need to dig any of it up,
when you shovel it vigorously yourself. I would not have known to
check your claims if you'd never made the false claims in the first
place.

You're in the position you find yourself, by virtue of your own slimy,
dishonest, sociopathic, delusional actions, John. You really need to
take a hard look in the mirror this afternoon and ask yourself why you
are not seeking help. I can assure you that I'm in no way jealous of a
psychotic loner.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Only someone mentally ill, like PD, would hold me responsible
for recalling when he started pestering me.

I didn't make the statement. You did. I do hold you responsible for
the truth of statements YOU make.

.. within two months out of
four years. *That two month error, for PD, suggests my
"imperfection". *I'll bet that he couldn't guess within two months
when he started pestering, me. *So, PD is the imperfect one, don't you
think. *— NE —

I didn't guess. I *checked*. That's the difference between you and me.
You GUESS and pass it off as truth. I CHECK before making a statement
I allege as truth.

Your credibility is shot because your statements are guesses,
suppositions, idle comments, even when they are about yourself. You
claim you have patents you do not have.

By the way, the three remaining patents you have in application stage
are for an oil dipstick, a clip for holding shoelaces, and a catheter
for men with prostate problems.- Hide quoted text -

...

read more »- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Dec 20, 7:44*pm, NoEinstein wrote:
On Dec 19, 5:56*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Folks: *It's been over two days since I dug up the patent number on my
Monolithic Concrete Slab Construction. *PD, the PNG & PNB, is usually
all over every reply that I make, anywhere. *But he isn't likely to
admit he was wrong. *Rude people never do. *So, I'll let him fume in
his own virtue-less vacuum. *— NoEinstein —



On Dec 18, 7:35*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 17, 2:16*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Folks: *It will be interesting to note how long it takes PD, the PNG &
PNB, to look-up my Monolithic Concrete Slab Construction, from the
patent number I found. *PD claims I am 'senile' for not remembering a
9-digit number from decades ago, *For several days he has claimed I am
a liar (sic), because he can't understand how to research older
patents. *It should be obvious that PD is no gentleman when he fails
to apologize for his rude errors. *If any person on this Earth knows
anything positive that PD has ever done in his life, enlighten us.
But such light is likely to be "dim" indeed. *— NE —

On Dec 16, 11:48*am, PD wrote:

On Dec 15, 8:22*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 6:36*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 4:04*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 3:51*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 1:55*pm, PD wrote:

Folks: *Paul Draperbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting*****end_of_t he_skype_highlighting, the airhead, persona non grata, persona non
brain, has STRUCK OUT on science for over four years. *Now, he has
become a self-appointed expert on Patents. *Yet, he himself has none.
The reason he can't find anything about my major floor system
invention, is because such probably predated the computerized data
base. *I am not concerned in the least whether PD, the leach, parasite
DUNCE, considers me to be a liar. *He has never made a '+new post' on
any news group in over four years that he has pestered me.. *His only
motives in life are angry, negative ones. *The only "warmth" that will
ever be directed toward PD is when he BURNS in Hell for eternity! *—
NE —

Not so, John.
1. The computerized database includes all patents since 1790 and full-
text patent reports since 1976. Unless your patent was filed before
1790....
2. I've made a significant number of new posts, regardless of your
inability to find ANYONE'S new posts other than your own.
3. You say I have pestered you for "over four years". The first time I
responded to any of your posts was February 16, 2007. You'll note that
is less than four years ago.

Ah, correction -- February 14, 2007. Still less than four years ago.

If you make three errors of fact in one short paragraph, and you do
this on top of lying about a patent you do not hold on a process or
product for which there is no public information whatsoever, then you
shoot your own credibility right in the foot, John.

You may foam and blather that I'm going to hell for not supporting you
with warmth and positivity, John, but your blatant abuse of the truth
and persistent and malicious lying is going to land you there well
ahead of me.

On Dec 13, 8:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 13, 10:45*am, PD wrote:

Folks: *PD, the PNG & PNB, is the sneaky leach who trolls the NET
seeking dirt on anyone he is jealous of. *My Plen-E-Air Slab floor
system manages to get the entire electrical and mechanical supply
services for a commercial office building floor to fit within a 12"
thick structural, poured-in-place slab. *The return air is within the
twelve inch space between the suspended ceiling and the bottom of the
structural slab. *The recessed light fixtures fit within the latter
12" space.

Conventional floor systems, such as the fated World Trade Center
Buildings used (about) 36" deep metal trusses, that had ****-poor
sprayed-on fireproofing. *The total depth, floor-to-ceiling, was about
five humongous feet of essentially wasted space. *When those planes
crashed into the buildings, the trusses got knocked sideways and the
fireproofing mostly fell off. *Structural steel exposed to high heat
will soften to the point of loosing its load carrying ability. *That's
why the two buildings pancaked to the ground.

If my Plen-E-Air Slab floor system had been used on those buildings,
the immediate cost saving would have been about 15% less (total
building!). *And there would be about a 10% increase in the leasable
floor space per building, because fewer elevators would be required to
serve the buildings (the floors would be closer together, reduces the
travel times); and the area taken up by fire stairways would be
considerably less, for the same reasons. *A more compact building
reduces the heating and cooling loads by about 15%, and cuts the cost
of the building foundations another 15%, plus making buildings more
resistant to winds and to earthquakes.

If those same planes had hit a building constructed with my Plen-E-Air
Slab, the edge-on rigidity of the floor slabs would have forced the
planes to go skidding in one side of the buildings and out the other.
Even if the full fuel load of a jet got spilled on a floor, the slabs
would still have a massive 4-hr. fire resistance. *Depending upon the
structural layout, it would be likely that one or more columns would
be knocked out. *But by the simple expedient of having "mechanical/
structural" super floors about every ten floors, it would be possible
to have all the columns be backed-up with super strong cables that
would support a slab from ABOVE if a column were to be knocked out
below. *Additionally, the sheet metal void former for my system
creates a two-way (reversible loading) capacity. *Though a slab with a
column knocked out would sag a good bit, it should not go pancaking to
the ground. *In short, the two World Trade Center buildings would both
have been back in service about seven years ago!

The above capsule description should be more informative than having
any airhead PNG, like Paul Draper, go on any pointless searches for
dirt. *— NoEinstein —

The point of the search would be to establish your credibility, John,
to see if you can discern the difference between reality and fantasy,
or to see if you're a compulsive liar. If the news is bad on either
score, you see, you will find that your ideas will not meet with much
interest, as no one wants to further the ideas of either liars or
lunatics.

There are no patents listed for either "Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-
directional voided slab", and there are no other patents than the two
previously mentioned under your name. Furthermore, a Google search for
"Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-directional voided slab" return no hits other
than the posts here in which you mentioned them.

A liar makes his own dirt, John. I have no need to dig any of it up,
when you shovel it vigorously yourself. I would not have known to
check your claims if you'd never made the false claims in the first
place.

You're in the position you find yourself, by virtue of your own slimy,
dishonest, sociopathic, delusional actions, John. You really need to
take a hard look in the mirror this afternoon and ask yourself why you
are not seeking help. I can assure you that I'm in no way jealous of a
psychotic loner.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Only someone mentally ill, like PD, would hold me responsible
for recalling when he started pestering me.

I didn't make the statement. You did. I do hold you responsible for
the truth of statements YOU make.

.. within two months out of
four years. *That two month error, for PD, suggests my
"imperfection". *I'll bet that he couldn't guess within two months
when he started pestering, me. *So, PD is

...

read more »

just walking by the door that was left open and heard you talking to
yourself.
something about a sidewalk patent,....
last time I passed I was hearing about a new space travel theory you
had.
maybe nasa could use your concrete knowledge to terraform the moon,
but you still have not said much about your space travel theory. I'd
say leave space travel to nasa and stick with what you know best .
that would be concrete.


holog

On Dec 21, 8:42*pm, holog wrote:

Dear holog: The minute-manager in me doesn't allow time to discuss
futuristic escapes. My availability to invent the devices our
civilization needs is compromised by the amount of... YEARS it has
taken to get my New Science accepted. Science in academia is all
screwed up. Those frauds are making too much money from research
grants on anything about... relativity, to embrace my corrections to
the texts. This country is going-down-the-tubes because of creeping
socialism. Apathy and human inertia are to blame. I've written a New
Constitution of the United States of America. Have you heard of it?
Read on Google's Political Forum: "Start the revolution! Government
is out-of-touch with the people!" And... talk about what I have done
for science—it's a thousand times more than is being recognized. —
NoEinstein —

On Dec 20, 7:44*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 19, 5:56*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Folks: *It's been over two days since I dug up the patent number on my
Monolithic Concrete Slab Construction. *PD, the PNG & PNB, is usually
all over every reply that I make, anywhere. *But he isn't likely to
admit he was wrong. *Rude people never do. *So, I'll let him fume in
his own virtue-less vacuum. *— NoEinstein —

On Dec 18, 7:35*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 17, 2:16*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Folks: *It will be interesting to note how long it takes PD, the PNG &
PNB, to look-up my Monolithic Concrete Slab Construction, from the
patent number I found. *PD claims I am 'senile' for not remembering a
9-digit number from decades ago, *For several days he has claimed I am
a liar (sic), because he can't understand how to research older
patents. *It should be obvious that PD is no gentleman when he fails
to apologize for his rude errors. *If any person on this Earth knows
anything positive that PD has ever done in his life, enlighten us.
But such light is likely to be "dim" indeed. *— NE —

On Dec 16, 11:48*am, PD wrote:

On Dec 15, 8:22*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 6:36*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 4:04*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 3:51*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 1:55*pm, PD wrote:

Folks: *Paul Draperbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting*****end_of_t he_skype_highlighting, the airhead, persona non grata, persona non
brain, has STRUCK OUT on science for over four years. *Now, he has
become a self-appointed expert on Patents. *Yet, he himself has none.
The reason he can't find anything about my major floor system
invention, is because such probably predated the computerized data
base. *I am not concerned in the least whether PD, the leach, parasite
DUNCE, considers me to be a liar. *He has never made a '+new post' on
any news group in over four years that he has pestered me. *His only
motives in life are angry, negative ones. *The only "warmth" that will
ever be directed toward PD is when he BURNS in Hell for eternity! *—
NE —

Not so, John.
1. The computerized database includes all patents since 1790 and full-
text patent reports since 1976. Unless your patent was filed before
1790....
2. I've made a significant number of new posts, regardless of your
inability to find ANYONE'S new posts other than your own.
3. You say I have pestered you for "over four years". The first time I
responded to any of your posts was February 16, 2007. You'll note that
is less than four years ago.

Ah, correction -- February 14, 2007. Still less than four years ago.

If you make three errors of fact in one short paragraph, and you do
this on top of lying about a patent you do not hold on a process or
product for which there is no public information whatsoever, then you
shoot your own credibility right in the foot, John.

You may foam and blather that I'm going to hell for not supporting you
with warmth and positivity, John, but your blatant abuse of the truth
and persistent and malicious lying is going to land you there well
ahead of me.

On Dec 13, 8:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 13, 10:45*am, PD wrote:

Folks: *PD, the PNG & PNB, is the sneaky leach who trolls the NET
seeking dirt on anyone he is jealous of. *My Plen-E-Air Slab floor
system manages to get the entire electrical and mechanical supply
services for a commercial office building floor to fit within a 12"
thick structural, poured-in-place slab. *The return air is within the
twelve inch space between the suspended ceiling and the bottom of the
structural slab. *The recessed light fixtures fit within the latter
12" space.

Conventional floor systems, such as the fated World Trade Center
Buildings used (about) 36" deep metal trusses, that had ****-poor
sprayed-on fireproofing. *The total depth, floor-to-ceiling, was about
five humongous feet of essentially wasted space. *When those planes
crashed into the buildings, the trusses got knocked sideways and the
fireproofing mostly fell off. *Structural steel exposed to high heat
will soften to the point of loosing its load carrying ability. *That's
why the two buildings pancaked to the ground.

If my Plen-E-Air Slab floor system had been used on those buildings,
the immediate cost saving would have been about 15% less (total
building!). *And there would be about a 10% increase in the leasable
floor space per building, because fewer elevators would be required to
serve the buildings (the floors would be closer together, reduces the
travel times); and the area taken up by fire stairways would be
considerably less, for the same reasons. *A more compact building
reduces the heating and cooling loads by about 15%, and cuts the cost
of the building foundations another 15%, plus making buildings more
resistant to winds and to earthquakes.

If those same planes had hit a building constructed with my Plen-E-Air
Slab, the edge-on rigidity of the floor slabs would have forced the
planes to go skidding in one side of the buildings and out the other.
Even if the full fuel load of a jet got spilled on a floor, the slabs
would still have a massive 4-hr. fire resistance. *Depending upon the
structural layout, it would be likely that one or more columns would
be knocked out. *But by the simple expedient of having "mechanical/
structural" super floors about every ten floors, it would be possible
to have all the columns be backed-up with super strong cables that
would support a slab from ABOVE if a column were to be knocked out
below. *Additionally, the sheet metal void former for my system
creates a two-way (reversible loading) capacity. *Though a slab with a
column knocked out would sag a good bit, it should not go pancaking to
the ground. *In short, the two World Trade Center buildings would both
have been back in service about seven years ago!

The above capsule description should be more informative than having
any airhead PNG, like Paul Draper, go on any pointless searches for
dirt. *— NoEinstein —

The point of the search would be to establish your credibility, John,
to see if you can discern the difference between reality and fantasy,
or to see if you're a compulsive liar. If the news is bad on either
score, you see, you will find that your ideas will not meet with much
interest, as no one wants to further the ideas of either liars or
lunatics.

There are no patents listed for either "Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-
directional voided slab", and there are no other patents than the two
previously mentioned under your name. Furthermore, a Google search for
"Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-directional voided slab" return no hits other
than the posts here in which you mentioned them.

A liar makes his own dirt, John. I have no need to dig any of it up,
when you shovel it vigorously yourself. I would not have known to
check your claims if you'd never made the false claims in the first
place.

You're in the position you find yourself, by virtue of your own slimy,
dishonest, sociopathic, delusional actions, John. You really need to
take a hard look in the mirror this afternoon and ask yourself why you
are not seeking help. I can assure you that I'm in no way jealous of a
psychotic loner.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Only someone mentally ill, like PD, would hold me responsible
for recalling when he started pestering me.

I didn't make the statement. You did. I do hold you responsible for
the truth of statements YOU make.

.. within two months out of
four years. *That two month error, for PD, suggests my
"imperfection". *I'll bet that he couldn't guess within two months
when he started pestering, me. *So, PD is

...

read more »

just walking by the door that was left open and heard you talking to
yourself.
something about a sidewalk patent,....
last time I passed I was hearing about a new space travel theory you
had.
maybe nasa could use your concrete knowledge to terraform the moon,
but you still have not said much about your space travel theory. I'd
say leave space travel to nasa and stick with what you know best .
that would be concrete.

holog

On Dec 28, 5:22*pm, NoEinstein wrote:


One indication of my own genius is that I am multi-talented. *The
floor system invention which I have recently described is one
indication. *The 'New Constitution of the United States of
America' (see Google's Political Forum: "Start the Revolution.
Government is out-of-touch with the People!") is another indication.
Those who might be interested can read my recently published book:
'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity.' *Such is
available at Amazon and at B. and N. *— NoEinstein — *real name: John
A. Armistead


John, if you think that self-publication through a vanity press --
which anyone can do -- or making posts to an unmoderated newsgroup --
which anyone can do -- or to write a rant about government -- which
anyone can do -- or patent an invention that nobody uses -- which
anyone can do -- is an indication of genius, then you should also
commit yourself to a mental health facility -- which anyone can do.

The answer to this group post is that it is kinetic mass and a point
of infinitely dense energy.

Mitch Raemsch

NoEinstein


Your post has reached 600 responses, and that shows that it is of much
interest.


Mass “matter “ created by velocity of energy at c^2, which is
“c in linear direction, x c in 90 degree angular direction”, and is
point on EM spectrum where energy turns to matter, showing that c^2 is
not just a dimensionless conversion factor of energy to matter with
no physical reality, but is an actual conversion frequency/wavelength,
where energy turns to matter, because it acquires a circular and or
spherical rotation, which gives it rest mass..


I did not have a chance to go through it all but I have a (Geometrical
Interpretation of E=mc^2 = E=mc^circled and or sphered), which I think
is gathering supporting evidence at an exponential rate

It demonstrates that matter “mass” is a direct consequence of
velocity. But this can only be clearly seen at the frequency/
wavelength of “c^2”, meaning that at the frequency where “c in the
linear direction, equals and is balanced by c in the right angular
direction, as the frequency of cycles of rotation reach that point,
energy acquires “rest mass,” through circular and or spherical
rotation, due to a balance of centrifugal/centripetal forces.

This is the point on the EM or electromagnetic spectrum, where it can
be seen also as the “energy /matter” spectrum, and matter is formed
because of velocity in right angular direction, equaling and balancing
velocity in linear direction..

Before that, it is hard to see an increase in matter, except if you
consider that a wave of low energy, mass, and momentum, which is long
and more wave like to has less matter like because it is also less
compressed than a shorter wave of more mass, energy, and momentum,
which is more particle like, measurable through photo electric effect.
One might also notice that an object that acquires relative mass,
kinetic energy, and increase momentum through motion, such as a
bullet, thrown stone, or speeding car, also seems to become more
compressed “Lorentz contraction” and harder,. demonstrated by it
hitting its target harder.

See: :http://wbabin.net/science/countess.pdf


Conrad J Countess