|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How Did the Universe Survive the Big Bang?
How Did the Universe Survive the Big Bang?
In This Experiment, Clues Remain Elusive By KENNETH CHANG Published in New York Times April 12, 2007 An experiment some hoped would reveal a new class of subatomic particles, and perhaps even point to clues about why the universe exists at all, has instead produced a first round of results that are mysteriously inconclusive. "What we got was intellectually interesting," said Janet M. Conrad, professor of physics at Columbia University and a spokeswoman for a collaboration that involves 77 scientists at 17 institutions. "We have to figure out what it is." Dr. Conrad and William C. Louis, a physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, presented their initial findings in a talk yesterday at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, outside Chicago, where the experiment is being performed. The goal was to confirm or refute observations made in the 90s in a Los Alamos experiment that observed transformations in the evanescent but bountiful particles known as neutrinos. Neutrinos have no electrical charge and almost no mass, but there are so many of them that they could collectively outweigh all the stars in the universe. Many physicists remain skeptical about the Los Alamos findings, but the new experiment has attracted wide interest. The Fermilab auditorium was filled with some 800 people, and talks were given at the 16 additional institutions by other collaborating scientists. That reflected in part the hope of finding cracks in the Standard Model, which encapsulates physicists' current knowledge about fundamental particles and forces. The Standard Model has proved remarkably effective and accurate, but it cannot answer some fundamental questions, like why the universe did not completely annihilate itself an instant after the Big Bang. [The answer is quite simple/elegant: There never was a "Big Bang." The universe is the result of an evolution--and as with any evolution, there is always enough time allowed for all the factors involved to bring about the overall harmony and consistency which eventually gives the impression to those who believe (like those who believe that the universe erupted magically from the Big Bang Bean), those who believe that all the problems HAD to have been solved from the start... and that therefore the only possible answer is An Infinitely Informed Creator (in other words, one cannot argue a Big Bang without it arguing a God).] 'The solution has been available for everyone to read it since the last century now on the internet. You can find it at: http://physics.sdrodrian.com What the "neutrino results" described below are actually hinting at is the fact that the universe is a LOT older and considerably more extensive than heretofore "conventionally" suspected. SDR] The birth of the universe 13.7 billion years ago created equal amounts of matter and antimatter. Since matter and antimatter annihilate each other when they come in contact, that would have left nothing to coalesce into stars and galaxies. There must be some imbalance in the laws of physics that led to a slight preponderance of matter over antimatter, and that extra bit of matter formed everything in the visible universe. The imbalance, some physicists believe, may be hiding in the dynamics of neutrinos: Neutrinos come in three known types, or flavors. And they can change flavor as they travel, a process that can occur only because of the smidgen of mass they carry. But the neutrino transformations reported in the Los Alamos data do not fit the three-flavor model, suggesting four flavors of neutrinos, if not more. Other data, from experiments elsewhere, have said the additional neutrinos would have to be "sterile" - completely oblivious to the rest of the universe except for gravity. The new experiment is called MiniBooNE. (BooNE, pronounced boon, is a contraction of Booster Neutrino Experiment. "Booster" refers to a Fermilab booster ring that accelerates protons, and "mini" was added because of plans for a second, larger stage to the research.) MiniBooNE sought to count the number of times one flavor of neutrino, called a muon, turned into another flavor, an electron neutrino. The experiment slams a beam of protons into a piece of beryllium, and the cascade of particles from the subatomic wreckage includes muon neutrinos that fly about 1,650 feet to a detection chamber, a tank 40 feet in diameter that contains 250,000 gallons of mineral oil. Most of the neutrinos fly through unscathed, but occasionally a neutrino crashes into a carbon atom in the mineral oil. That sets off another cascade of particles, which is detected by 1,280 light detectors mounted on the inside of the tank. From the pattern of the cascades, the physicists distinguish whether the incoming neutrino was of muon flavor or electron. To minimize the chances of fooling themselves, they deliberately did not look at any of the electron neutrino events until they felt they had adequately understood the much more common muon neutrino events. They finally "opened the box" on their electron neutrino data on March 26 and began the analysis leading to their announcement yesterday. For most of the neutrino energy range they looked at, they did not see any more electron neutrinos than would be predicted by the Standard Model. That ruled out the simplest ways of interpreting the Los Alamos neutrino data, Dr. Conrad and Dr. Louis said. But at the lower energies, the scientists did see more electron neutrinos than predicted: 369, rather than the predicted 273. That may simply mean that some calculations are off. Or it could point to a subtler interplay of particles, known and unknown. "It's tantalizing," said Boris Kayser, a Fermilab physicist not on the MiniBooNE project. "It could be real. But this remains to be established." Dr. Louis said he was surprised by the results. "I was sort of expecting a clear excess or no excess," he said. "In a sense, we got both." S D Rodrian http://poems.sdrodrian.com http://physics.sdrodrian.com http://mp3.sdrodrian.com All religions are local. Only science is universal. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Did the Universe Survive the Big Bang? | sdr | Astronomy Misc | 39 | August 10th 07 01:10 AM |
could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!??? | Sam Wormley | Astronomy Misc | 4 | June 14th 06 05:11 PM |
could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!??? | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | June 14th 06 05:11 PM |
could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!??? | Sam Wormley | Astronomy Misc | 6 | June 14th 06 12:57 PM |
could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!??? | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | June 14th 06 12:57 PM |