A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Two views of the Vacuum



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 1st 06, 04:14 PM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Two views of the Vacuum

Two views of the Vacuum
In modern science there are two mutually exclusive points of view
on the behaviour of particles in a Vacuum. One point of view is
the position of classical physics which says that:
In the vacuum at T=0K any movement of a particle stops.
And if in the Empire of Cold there is no movement, it is a dead empire.

But another point of view completely rejects this formulation.
This point of view is expressed in the quantum theory. In 1911, M.
Planck
stated that energy does not become zero at the approach T=0K.
He declared this on the 1st Solvay congress. So " Energy at T=0K"
became
the main problem in physics because " Physics is first of all the
vacuum".
Gradually it began to appear that Vacuum at T=0K is not empty dead
space.
There live the "virtual" particles. These particles originally have
negative and
imaginary mass, and then make a virtual transition » to positive
mass,
becoming real particles. But the apparently mystical "virtual
particles"
as they make "virtual transitions". explains little.
Let's rethink these "virtual" particles. Let's ask a question:
What is the geometrical form of "virtual" particles in the Vacuum at
T=0K?
The answer is:
According to the laws of physics :
J. Charles ( 1787), Gay-Lussac ( 1802), V. Nernst ( 1910), A.
Einstein ( 1925)
particles in a Vacuum cannot have volume and consequently should be
flat figures.
This means, particles have the geometrical form of a circle, as from
all flat figures
the circle has the most optimum form: C/D=pi.
What are these "virtual" circles in the vacuum?
The answer is given in the theory of radiation of absolute black
bodies.
The theory considers an area of the space which are in absolute
thermal balance.
It is possible only at T=0K. But it is known, that such a condition is
a
"thermal death " and is not observed in nature. Therefore Planck,
studying this area,
came to the conclusion that condition T=0K has changed. In this space
there should be
a radiation of a quantum of light, possessing an internal impulse
h=Et=1.
So, « the virtual circle » is transformed to quantum of light.
This quantum of light has an impulse h=Et=1 and travels with constant
speed, c=1.
From this assumption Quantum theory was born.
Therefore the Quantum theory is a theory only about a quantum of light
and its various transformations.
And classical theory considers all other particles.
These particles have mass much greater than a quantum of light and
move with much smaller speeds. If we understand the difference between
a quantum of light and all other particles,
then all contradictions in the physics disappear, and all of physics
becomes a
harmoniously integral science.
* * *
http://www.socratus.com
Best regards.
Socratus.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's Waving?? Answer: Disturbed Quantum Vacuum nightbat Misc 42 May 18th 05 07:33 PM
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory Br Dan Izzo Astronomy Misc 8 September 7th 04 12:07 AM
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory Br Dan Izzo Astronomy Misc 0 August 31st 04 02:35 AM
Dark Energy Engines Jack Sarfatti Astronomy Misc 1 August 26th 04 11:19 AM
The Myth of Vacuum Force Metric Certainty. gravity jones Astronomy Misc 1 January 8th 04 05:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.