|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
On 6 Aug, 14:21, Einar wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote: Ian Parker wrote: On 4 Aug, 06:37, Matt Giwer wrote: A joke because once you introduce intelligent intervention anything is possible. But this might be the general answer. As there is no credible natural answer for the paradox then it has to be intelligent intervention. I would be thinking in terms of s simulation. If a simulation is complete enough what separates a simulation from real? Excellent dilemma which was explored in the Matrix trilogy. If we are part of some sort of a computersimulation and God is about to unplug the thing ET in the form of UFO sightings is completely impossible. The sort of ET spaceship we saw was in fact 1950's SF. real ET spaceships would be very small and the exploration would be done by nanotech. There we go with that impossible thing again. He is extrapolating a bit to far with his idea that aliens would have recorded themselves into some sort of a data-from. There is really no way to know, but if recordings of a self are possible, it sounds logical that aliens would. However that is by no means certain, it may prove impossible or alternativelly the alienīs religion might have banned such recordings of a self. For whatever itīs worth, an alien generation ship would be entirelly possible. It could be, for all what we know, be mascerading as an asteroid in the asteroid belt. I think I should perhaps clarify what I said or rather meant to say. Replying to so many people you can loose track! On the question of us being an alien simulation, what I was meaning was that rather than simply look at us to see whether we evolved the way they did, they would have a simulaton. This of course says nothing about the way ET would explore the Earth or the solar system. As I keep on saying large spaceships are an impossibility. I have spoken about dragonflies. What ET would want to do (probably) is to get some idea of the chemistry of terrestriallife. Small chemical probes would be ideal for this. Yes ET could be on an asteroid. That is of course until all the asteroids are explored! However, in like manner as the hypotheses about God, the alien hypotheses remains completelly untestable. That does not necessarilly make it rubbish, as after all both could be true, even both at the same time, but they really are completelly untestable. God and ET are really completely different things. I think that ET would need to have very strong religious beliefs NOT to colonize and to stay invisible. There is one other point which I feel should also be made here. It is this. Dyson civilisations have been postulated. All the IR stars we have seen are cool supergiants. There is no hint of anything artificial anywhere in space. God to some extent is based on the cosmic censorship principle. Some scientists are trying to find out whether prayer really does have an effect, or whether hidden objects can be seen in "out of the body" experiences. Suppose you had led a selfish life and on the operating table you started to feel unconfortably hot and could smell sulphur. Nobody but a fool would fail to amend their life. No we must lead a good life without. Perhaps Christian apologetics should focus on the Christian way of life and moral code and not on the miraculous. I think that if you believe in God you probably have had certain experiences which convince you but which you cannot share. Belief in God cannot per se be criticised but on the other hand I feel it is a mistake to "wear it on your shoulder". I don't think you do, but me remarks are pretty general. I think we can probably say that if ET exists in the way you suggest, God must too. The simple reason is this. In the absense of a compelling religious morality they would have taken us over yonks ago. - Ian Parker |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
Matt Giwer wrote:
: : If there were such a thing why, after the Louisiana Purchase, did Jefferson had :to pay people to explore it instead of just interviewing those who had indulged :the exploration impulse to explore it on their own? : Because he wanted detailed records kept and wanted them back. DOH! -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
Ian Parker wrote:
: :Every civilization is confronted with identical technological :challenges. If we can build 0.15 micron chips they can be built on :Alpha Centauri, If our technology is moving to molecular memories ET :is sure to have them (bearing in mind existence at all!). Yes we can :make reasonable deductions. : And assuming identical technological development is not necessarily a reasonable assumption. : :It is clear to me that the Area 51 legends are 1950's SF. They cannot :be anything else. Either ET is flying tiny robotic spacecraft or he is :not flying at all. These are the only two possibilities that remotely ass logic. : And yet you never apply 'logic' to them. You merely assert that this must be so because Ian Parker says so and move on. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
Einar wrote:
: :Fred J. McCall wrote: : Ian Parker wrote: : : If you want to discuss the Fermi Paradox, let me ask you a question : that is germane to that issue. If ETs exist, why haven't we already : detected them via radio? : : :If I reply to that one, it might be because they donīt use radio. :Personally I have never quite bought the argument that radio is the :most convenient technological communication method in all of :exchistence. : But Ian insists that they would develop just like us, so they must be emitting all sorts of RF. : :This is one of those question we probably have to accept to be an :unknown. Aliens might be out there, they might not. Our assumptions on :theyr behavior based on what we would do could all be false. : There are certainly answers, but they must violate Ian's sacrosanct "ET is just like us" assumptions. -- "False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil." -- Socrates |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
Fred J. McCall wrote: Einar wrote: : :Fred J. McCall wrote: : Ian Parker wrote: : : If you want to discuss the Fermi Paradox, let me ask you a question : that is germane to that issue. If ETs exist, why haven't we already : detected them via radio? : : :If I reply to that one, it might be because they donīt use radio. :Personally I have never quite bought the argument that radio is the :most convenient technological communication method in all of :exchistence. : But Ian insists that they would develop just like us, so they must be emitting all sorts of RF. There are allmost infinite possibilities. Aliens, to name one out of all the possible, might not communicate through sound. It might be a form of visual communication, like colour patterns, hand, tentacles, leg waving in other words sign language, it might be smell or pheromons being emitted. Beings that donīt communicate through sound might not stumble on radiocommunication at all. : :This is one of those question we probably have to accept to be an :unknown. Aliens might be out there, they might not. Our assumptions on :theyr behavior based on what we would do could all be false. : There are certainly answers, but they must violate Ian's sacrosanct "ET is just like us" assumptions. -- "False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil." -- Socrates In addition, they might be some sort of hive beings, where the idea of personal identity and rights might not exist. To such beings Earthīs societies might be completelly inconprehensible. Cheers, Einar |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
Ian Parker wrote: On 6 Aug, 14:21, Einar wrote: Matt Giwer wrote: Ian Parker wrote: On 4 Aug, 06:37, Matt Giwer wrote: A joke because once you introduce intelligent intervention anything is possible. But this might be the general answer. As there is no credible natural answer for the paradox then it has to be intelligent intervention. I would be thinking in terms of s simulation. If a simulation is complete enough what separates a simulation from real? Excellent dilemma which was explored in the Matrix trilogy. If we are part of some sort of a computersimulation and God is about to unplug the thing ET in the form of UFO sightings is completely impossible. The sort of ET spaceship we saw was in fact 1950's SF. real ET spaceships would be very small and the exploration would be done by nanotech. There we go with that impossible thing again. He is extrapolating a bit to far with his idea that aliens would have recorded themselves into some sort of a data-from. There is really no way to know, but if recordings of a self are possible, it sounds logical that aliens would. However that is by no means certain, it may prove impossible or alternativelly the alienīs religion might have banned such recordings of a self. For whatever itīs worth, an alien generation ship would be entirelly possible. It could be, for all what we know, be mascerading as an asteroid in the asteroid belt. I think I should perhaps clarify what I said or rather meant to say. Replying to so many people you can loose track! On the question of us being an alien simulation, what I was meaning was that rather than simply look at us to see whether we evolved the way they did, they would have a simulaton. This of course says nothing about the way ET would explore the Earth or the solar system. As I keep on saying large spaceships are an impossibility. I have spoken about dragonflies. What ET would want to do (probably) is to get some idea of the chemistry of terrestriallife. Small chemical probes would be ideal for this. Yes ET could be on an asteroid. That is of course until all the asteroids are explored! I said, the spaceship might maskerate as an asteroyd. However, in theory asteroyds could be made into spaceships. But, they would only be capable of gentle accelerations hence travel time would be lengthy. But if one has enough time long travel times might not be a trouble...say like if the beings aboard are all frosen until arrival time. I donīt think you have ever actually stated it why you think large or huge interstellar ships are impossible? Presuming FTL to be impossible, voiages would be subluminal and hence time consuming, but varyous strategies could compensate for that. A) The ship could be truly enormous, basigly a self contained world capable of existing for indefinite periods of time without exhausting its resources, which would imply 100% or very near 100% resycling of all waste. B) The crew might be put into some form of stasis, which could be maintainded for an indefinite time. The most simple form would be freesing the crew, if reliable revival technologies have been developed. That would require a still a large ship, but not as enormous one as in A). C) The crew could be frosen zygots, that have to be grown by technological means into viable beings once on arrival. In this case the ship would be a wholly automated one, might be quite small minus the propulsion package, which would construct on arrival the means for growing the crew. D) The crew might be computerdata only, assuming personalities really can be uploaded into a computer. On arrival the computer personalities might download themselves into whatever convenient form for system exploration. This is the smallest of my whatif-scenario-crafts. However, in like manner as the hypotheses about God, the alien hypotheses remains completelly untestable. That does not necessarilly make it rubbish, as after all both could be true, even both at the same time, but they really are completelly untestable. God and ET are really completely different things. I think that ET would need to have very strong religious beliefs NOT to colonize and to stay invisible. There is one other point which I feel should also be made here. It is this. Dyson civilisations have been postulated. All the IR stars we have seen are cool supergiants. There is no hint of anything artificial anywhere in space. Dyson spheres is only an idea among many. Another idea is a fractal, which actually would contain several times the internal volume of a Dyson sphere. Still another idea is a ring, which would be far smaller than a Dyson sphere, yet for that far more likelly. In addition it wouldnīt radically alter the light output of the star it would be orbiting, hence would be essentially invisible to our observance. That same would be true about artificial constructs that are smaller than a ring, like large hollow sphere hapitats that might only be the equivalent size of a planetoid up to the size range of a small planet. In addition, spacestations would also be invisible to our observance capabilities. God to some extent is based on the cosmic censorship principle. Some scientists are trying to find out whether prayer really does have an effect, or whether hidden objects can be seen in "out of the body" experiences. Suppose you had led a selfish life and on the operating table you started to feel unconfortably hot and could smell sulphur. Nobody but a fool would fail to amend their life. No we must lead a good life without. Perhaps Christian apologetics should focus on the Christian way of life and moral code and not on the miraculous. I think that if you believe in God you probably have had certain experiences which convince you but which you cannot share. Belief in God cannot per se be criticised but on the other hand I feel it is a mistake to "wear it on your shoulder". I don't think you do, but me remarks are pretty general. I think we can probably say that if ET exists in the way you suggest, God must too. The simple reason is this. In the absense of a compelling religious morality they would have taken us over yonks ago. - Ian Parker The existence of aliens does by no means preclute the existence of god. As both the existence of God and existence of aliens are untestable, we can only hypothyse about them. We can only state that, aliens that behave similar to us are probably unlikelly. However, we canīt preclute the existence of aliens who are very radically different from us in behavior. Who simply donīt have the comparable drives that are driving us. Cheers, Einar |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
In article . com,
Ian Parker wrote: Rand Simberg and Fred Mc Call simply refuse to think rationally. Intersellar travel can be effected using a Von Neumann probe. True, it probably could. It cannot be done any other way. This part is nonsense. FTL is impossible. This is probably true. I know you're a big fan of VN probes, but they are certainly NOT required for pretty much anything -- traditional manufacturing methods can produce anything a VN probe can produce, and probably do it better. It would seem inconceivable to me that an interstellar flight would begin without such technology. You need to stretch your ability to conceive, then. Imagine a solar system full of trillions of people, living everywhere matter and energy are to be found, including out in the Oort cloud, which has plenty of hydrogen for fusion and probably all other elements that are needed too, all in nice shallow gravity wells. Those Oort cloud inhabitants would have fast, mobile colony ships (probably fusion drives), since while there is a LOT of matter out there, the distance between chunks of it is pretty great. Eventually, it gets harder and harder to find a chunk of it that hasn't already been claimed -- but look, only a light year or so away, are the unclaimed chunks of Alpha Centauri's Oort cloud. So somebody decides to head out into the black, maybe spending 50 years or more on the journey, but knowing that at the end is a whole new system full of resources. Or, suppose people have been uploaded, as seems quite likely by that time. In that case, you send your advance probes unmanned and small, by some very fast method such as a laser sail, with a pile of uninhabited bodies. Once in orbit around the target star, they turn their receiving antenna towards Sol, and we broadcast over the brain patterns of whoever wants to go, at light speed. These are downloaded into the waiting bodies, they wake up, and start building. There is more than one way to empty a solar system. Even without self-replicating machines. -- "Polywell" fusion -- an approach to nuclear fusion that might actually work. Learn more and discuss via: http://www.strout.net/info/science/polywell/ |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
In article ,
Matt Giwer wrote: Fred J. McCall wrote: Ian Parker wrote: : :Rand Simberg and Fred Mc Call simply refuse to think rationally. : This is quite funny, coming from the guy who insists that ONLY an AI probe is possible. ... I don't mean to rain on parades here but a lot of this is based upon the most American myth of a human impulse to explore the unknown. It is a wonderful myth. It inspires. But there is not a single example of it. Matt, it has nothing to do with American myths. Expansion into new niches is a universal law of living things. It's easy to see why: living things reproduce, passing along traits but with some variation. This variation leads to some with more tendency to expand, and some with more tendency to stay put. When there are new niches available, the ones with a tendency to expand will stumble upon them, and their reproductive fitness will be very high, since they will have abundant resources (and no predators, in a multi-species ecology, though that wouldn't apply to the first spacefaring civilization). So the genes or memes resulting a tendency to expand are strongly selected for, resulting in an even greater tendency to expand. This trend stops only when there are no more niches available for colonization. Note that it doesn't matter whether the things involved are bugs, or civilized thinkers, or robots, or Tribbles, or whatever. It also doesn't matter whether the basic unit of reproduction & variation is the gene, or the meme, or the computer instruction, or some other representation of information that we haven't thought of it. If it reproduces with variations, then this universal law will apply. Humans are at an odd point at the moment where many feel we have begun to fill up the niches available to us. But some of us feel the urge to expand, for whatever reason, and soon we'll have the technology to do so. Those of us who do manage to exploit off-Earth resources will have high reproductive (and economic) fitness, and that tendency to expand will be strongly selected for. We'll expand out into the solar system like an explosion. And then, in a century or two when the solar system starts to feel crowded, we'll be having the same discussions again, only this time about expanding to other stars. And the same result will obtain. Best, - Joe -- "Polywell" fusion -- an approach to nuclear fusion that might actually work. Learn more and discuss via: http://www.strout.net/info/science/polywell/ |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
Joe Strout wrote: In article . com, Ian Parker wrote: Rand Simberg and Fred Mc Call simply refuse to think rationally. Intersellar travel can be effected using a Von Neumann probe. True, it probably could. It cannot be done any other way. This part is nonsense. FTL is impossible. This is probably true. I know you're a big fan of VN probes, but they are certainly NOT required for pretty much anything -- traditional manufacturing methods can produce anything a VN probe can produce, and probably do it better. It would seem inconceivable to me that an interstellar flight would begin without such technology. You need to stretch your ability to conceive, then. Imagine a solar system full of trillions of people, living everywhere matter and energy are to be found, including out in the Oort cloud, which has plenty of hydrogen for fusion and probably all other elements that are needed too, all in nice shallow gravity wells. Those Oort cloud inhabitants would have fast, mobile colony ships (probably fusion drives), since while there is a LOT of matter out there, the distance between chunks of it is pretty great. Eventually, it gets harder and harder to find a chunk of it that hasn't already been claimed -- but look, only a light year or so away, are the unclaimed chunks of Alpha Centauri's Oort cloud. So somebody decides to head out into the black, maybe spending 50 years or more on the journey, but knowing that at the end is a whole new system full of resources. Or, suppose people have been uploaded, as seems quite likely by that time. In that case, you send your advance probes unmanned and small, by some very fast method such as a laser sail, with a pile of uninhabited bodies. Once in orbit around the target star, they turn their receiving antenna towards Sol, and we broadcast over the brain patterns of whoever wants to go, at light speed. These are downloaded into the waiting bodies, they wake up, and start building. There is more than one way to empty a solar system. Even without self-replicating machines. -- "Polywell" fusion -- an approach to nuclear fusion that might actually work. Learn more and discuss via: http://www.strout.net/info/science/polywell/ That mega-solar civilization would be some centuries into the future. But I have read about ideas, f.e. from David Bring, about creating habitats inside comets and then to begin to gently push them beyond the gravity well of Sol. A civilization living inside the cometary haloes of the stars inside the Milky Way could continue spreading for tens of millions of years without exhausting the living space available. I once read the book "Dixtraīs war" about an encounter by humans by preciselly such a civilization, which had been present in the cometary haloes for hundreds of million of years. In that book it was presumed that the aliens were not intelligent like us, rather they had developed the minimally required technology somewhat in the hapsard fashion animals develope. There were all kinds of logical discontinuities in theyr tech. development, basigly brilliance beside the relativelly obsolete, many obvious development ends to a logical mind not being pursued. Unfortunatelly a brief internet search does not reveal any information about the book. It appears thoroughly forgotten. It still exists in my bookshelfs. Cheers, Einar |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox
Joe Strout wrote: In article . com, Ian Parker wrote: Rand Simberg and Fred Mc Call simply refuse to think rationally. Intersellar travel can be effected using a Von Neumann probe. True, it probably could. It cannot be done any other way. This part is nonsense. FTL is impossible. This is probably true. I know you're a big fan of VN probes, but they are certainly NOT required for pretty much anything -- traditional manufacturing methods can produce anything a VN probe can produce, and probably do it better. It would seem inconceivable to me that an interstellar flight would begin without such technology. You need to stretch your ability to conceive, then. Imagine a solar system full of trillions of people, living everywhere matter and energy are to be found, including out in the Oort cloud, which has plenty of hydrogen for fusion and probably all other elements that are needed too, all in nice shallow gravity wells. Those Oort cloud inhabitants would have fast, mobile colony ships (probably fusion drives), since while there is a LOT of matter out there, the distance between chunks of it is pretty great. Eventually, it gets harder and harder to find a chunk of it that hasn't already been claimed -- but look, only a light year or so away, are the unclaimed chunks of Alpha Centauri's Oort cloud. So somebody decides to head out into the black, maybe spending 50 years or more on the journey, but knowing that at the end is a whole new system full of resources. Or, suppose people have been uploaded, as seems quite likely by that time. In that case, you send your advance probes unmanned and small, by some very fast method such as a laser sail, with a pile of uninhabited bodies. Once in orbit around the target star, they turn their receiving antenna towards Sol, and we broadcast over the brain patterns of whoever wants to go, at light speed. These are downloaded into the waiting bodies, they wake up, and start building. There is more than one way to empty a solar system. Even without self-replicating machines. -- "Polywell" fusion -- an approach to nuclear fusion that might actually work. Learn more and discuss via: http://www.strout.net/info/science/polywell/ That mega-solar civilization would be some centuries into the future. But I have read about ideas, f.e. from David Brin, about creating habitats inside comets and then to begin to gently push them beyond the gravity well of Sol. A civilization living inside the cometary haloes of the stars inside the Milky Way could continue spreading for tens of millions of years, even hundreds of millions of years, without exhausting the living space available. I once read the book "Dixtraīs war" about an encounter by humans by preciselly such a civilization, which had been present in the cometary haloes for hundreds of million of years. In that book it was presumed that the aliens were not intelligent like us, rather they had developed the minimally required technology somewhat in the hapsard fashion animals develope. There were all kinds of logical discontinuities in theyr tech. development, basigly brilliance beside the relativelly obsolete, many obvious development ends to a logical mind not being pursued. Unfortunatelly a brief internet search does not reveal any information about the book. It appears thoroughly forgotten. It still exists in my bookshelfs. Cheers, Einar |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Missing sial, iron, and nickel explains Fermi paradox | [email protected] | Policy | 827 | September 4th 07 06:26 PM |
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox | Andrew Nowicki | SETI | 44 | May 1st 07 05:47 AM |
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox | Andrew Nowicki | Policy | 43 | April 9th 07 09:48 PM |
Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing? | Andrew Nowicki | Astronomy Misc | 15 | April 7th 07 08:10 PM |
Fermi Paradox | localhost | SETI | 0 | August 10th 03 12:26 AM |