sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary

Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and
Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?


The French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743-1794) was the first to
formulate a law of conservation of matter in chemical reactions. The
concept of inter-conversion of mass and energy has been studied by
various scientists qualitatively, even before Einstein.

1. Newton has quoted in his book ‘Opticks’ in 1704 that
"Gross bodies and light are convertible into one another...",
After about 200 years Einstein derived mathematical equation for
Newton’s perception i.e. ∆L =∆mc2 where ∆L is light energy
emitted when mass ∆m is annihilated and is speed of light. It is the
rarest coincidence in between Newton’s hypothesis and Einstein’s
mathematical derivation.

2. S. Tolver Preston proposed that a vast amount of energy can be
produced from matter in his book Physics of the Ether in 1875. Preston
determined that one grain could lift a 100,000-ton object up to a
height dmc2.of 1.9 miles. This deduction yields dE

3. Jules Henri Poincaré in 1900 applied the calculations in a recoil
process and reached at the conclusion in the form, mv = (E/c2)c. From
the viewpoint of dimensional analysis, E/c2 takes on the role of a
‘mass’ associated with radiation, which yields E=mc2.

4. Olinto De Pretto speculated E=mc2, implying that when v=c , then E=
mv2 becomes E=mc2 , in 1903-04. But Pretto neither gave specific
derivation nor mathematical calculations. Bartocci claimed that
Einstein was aware of De Pretto’s speculation of E=∆mc2 , which was
published about a year before.

5. Fritz Hasenohrl in 1904, concluded: “to the mechanical mass of our
system must be added an apparent mass which is given by, m=8E/3c2 where
E is the energy of the radiation.� In a later paper he further
improved result that mass exchanged is, m=4E/3c2. Ebenezer Cunningham
in 1914 in the book The Principles of Relativity showed that F.
Hasenöhrl, had made a slight error in his calculations. If errors are
removed then the mass exchanged is m =E/c2 or E = mc2. Thus in this
regard Hasenohrl’s contribution is the most significant, before
Einstein.

6. Frederick Soddi and M. Henri Becquerel both have predicted that in
radioactive emissions the mass of body decreases i.e. energy of
radiations is at the cost of mass.

7. Max Planck in 1907 made an in-depth investigation of the energy
"confined" within a body, but he did not use Einstein’s approach at
all. Planck derived an expression m-M= E/c2, for heat energy and mass
and interpreted that

� The inertia mass of body is altered by absorption or emission of
heat energy. The increments of mass of body are equal to heat energy
divided by square of speed of light.�

Planck acknowledged Einstein’s previous derivation but did not agree
with correctness of Einstein’s derivation.
Should these scientists be given credit of doing basic work in
assisting the discovery of E=mc2 ?

Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein.
Complied from various sources.
If some scientists is left , please add. I think one is JJ Thomson
Main sources for compilation

100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


_________________
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

GET THE **** OUT OF HERE YOUR MORON!



AJAY SHARMA wrote:

Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and
Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?

The French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743-1794) was the first to
formulate a law of conservation of matter in chemical reactions. The
concept of inter-conversion of mass and energy has been studied by
various scientists qualitatively, even before Einstein.

1. Newton has quoted in his book ‘Opticks’ in 1704 that
"Gross bodies and light are convertible into one another...",
After about 200 years Einstein derived mathematical equation for
Newton’s perception i.e. ∆L =∆mc2 where ∆L is light energy
emitted when mass ∆m is annihilated and is speed of light. It is the
rarest coincidence in between Newton’s hypothesis and Einstein’s
mathematical derivation.

2. S. Tolver Preston proposed that a vast amount of energy can be
produced from matter in his book Physics of the Ether in 1875. Preston
determined that one grain could lift a 100,000-ton object up to a
height dmc2.of 1.9 miles. This deduction yields dE

3. Jules Henri Poincaré in 1900 applied the calculations in a recoil
process and reached at the conclusion in the form, mv = (E/c2)c. From
the viewpoint of dimensional analysis, E/c2 takes on the role of a
‘mass’ associated with radiation, which yields E=mc2.

4. Olinto De Pretto speculated E=mc2, implying that when v=c , then E=
mv2 becomes E=mc2 , in 1903-04. But Pretto neither gave specific
derivation nor mathematical calculations. Bartocci claimed that
Einstein was aware of De Pretto’s speculation of E=∆mc2 , which was
published about a year before.

5. Fritz Hasenohrl in 1904, concluded: “to the mechanical mass of our
system must be added an apparent mass which is given by, m=8E/3c2 where
E is the energy of the radiation.� In a later paper he further
improved result that mass exchanged is, m=4E/3c2. Ebenezer Cunningham
in 1914 in the book The Principles of Relativity showed that F.
Hasenöhrl, had made a slight error in his calculations. If errors are
removed then the mass exchanged is m =E/c2 or E = mc2. Thus in this
regard Hasenohrl’s contribution is the most significant, before
Einstein.

6. Frederick Soddi and M. Henri Becquerel both have predicted that in
radioactive emissions the mass of body decreases i.e. energy of
radiations is at the cost of mass.

7. Max Planck in 1907 made an in-depth investigation of the energy
"confined" within a body, but he did not use Einstein’s approach at
all. Planck derived an expression m-M= E/c2, for heat energy and mass
and interpreted that

� The inertia mass of body is altered by absorption or emission of
heat energy. The increments of mass of body are equal to heat energy
divided by square of speed of light.�

Planck acknowledged Einstein’s previous derivation but did not agree
with correctness of Einstein’s derivation.
Should these scientists be given credit of doing basic work in
assisting the discovery of E=mc2 ?

Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein.
Complied from various sources.
If some scientists is left , please add. I think one is JJ Thomson
Main sources for compilation

100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

_________________
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

Impeach Bush wrote:
GET THE **** OUT OF HERE YOUR MORON!



AJAY SHARMA wrote:

Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and
Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?

The French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743-1794) was the first to
formulate a law of conservation of matter in chemical reactions. The
concept of inter-conversion of mass and energy has been studied by
various scientists qualitatively, even before Einstein.

1. Newton has quoted in his book ‘Opticks’ in 1704 that
"Gross bodies and light are convertible into one another...",
After about 200 years Einstein derived mathematical equation for
Newton’s perception i.e. ∆L =∆mc2 where ∆L is light energy
emitted when mass ∆m is annihilated and is speed of light. It is the
rarest coincidence in between Newton’s hypothesis and Einstein’s
mathematical derivation.

2. S. Tolver Preston proposed that a vast amount of energy can be
produced from matter in his book Physics of the Ether in 1875. Preston
determined that one grain could lift a 100,000-ton object up to a
height dmc2.of 1.9 miles. This deduction yields dE

3. Jules Henri Poincaré in 1900 applied the calculations in a recoil
process and reached at the conclusion in the form, mv = (E/c2)c. From
the viewpoint of dimensional analysis, E/c2 takes on the role of a
‘mass’ associated with radiation, which yields E=mc2.

4. Olinto De Pretto speculated E=mc2, implying that when v=c , then E=
mv2 becomes E=mc2 , in 1903-04. But Pretto neither gave specific
derivation nor mathematical calculations. Bartocci claimed that
Einstein was aware of De Pretto’s speculation of E=∆mc2 , which was
published about a year before.

5. Fritz Hasenohrl in 1904, concluded: “to the mechanical mass of our
system must be added an apparent mass which is given by, m=8E/3c2 where
E is the energy of the radiation.� In a later paper he further
improved result that mass exchanged is, m=4E/3c2. Ebenezer Cunningham
in 1914 in the book The Principles of Relativity showed that F.
Hasenöhrl, had made a slight error in his calculations. If errors are
removed then the mass exchanged is m =E/c2 or E = mc2. Thus in this
regard Hasenohrl’s contribution is the most significant, before
Einstein.

6. Frederick Soddi and M. Henri Becquerel both have predicted that in
radioactive emissions the mass of body decreases i.e. energy of
radiations is at the cost of mass.

7. Max Planck in 1907 made an in-depth investigation of the energy
"confined" within a body, but he did not use Einstein’s approach at
all. Planck derived an expression m-M= E/c2, for heat energy and mass
and interpreted that

� The inertia mass of body is altered by absorption or emission of
heat energy. The increments of mass of body are equal to heat energy
divided by square of speed of light.�

Planck acknowledged Einstein’s previous derivation but did not agree
with correctness of Einstein’s derivation.
Should these scientists be given credit of doing basic work in
assisting the discovery of E=mc2 ?

Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein.
Complied from various sources.
If some scientists is left , please add. I think one is JJ Thomson
Main sources for compilation

100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

_________________
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

--------------01B7277BADBEEE966D126B0D
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Google-AttachSize: 4251

!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"
html
GET THE **** OUT OF HERE YOUR MORON!
br 
br 
pAJAY SHARMA wrote:
blockquote TYPE=CITEEinstein�s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De
Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and
brSoddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?
pThe French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743-1794) was the first to
brformulate a law of conservation of matter in chemical reactions. The
brconcept of inter-conversion of mass and energy has been studied by
brvarious scientists qualitatively, even before Einstein.
p1. Newton has quoted in his book �Opticks�
in 1704 that
br"Gross bodies and light are convertible into one another...",
brAfter about 200 years Einstein derived mathematical equation for
brNewtonâ€?s perception i.e. â??L =â??mc2 where
â??L is light energy
bremitted when mass â??m is annihilated and is speed of light.
It is the
brrarest coincidence in between Newton�s hypothesis and
Einstein�s
brmathematical derivation.
p2. S. Tolver Preston proposed that a vast amount of energy can be
brproduced from matter in his book Physics of the Ether in 1875. Preston
brdetermined that one grain could lift a 100,000-ton object up to a
brheight  dmc2.ï?µof 1.9 miles. This deduction yields
dE
p3. Jules Henri Poincaré in 1900 applied the calculations
in a recoil
brprocess and reached at the conclusion in the form, mv = (E/c2)c. From
brthe viewpoint of dimensional analysis, E/c2 takes on the role of a
br�mass� associated with radiation, which yields
E=mc2.
p4. Olinto De Pretto speculated E=mc2, implying that when v=c , then
E=
brmv2 becomes E=mc2 , in 1903-04. But Pretto neither gave specific
brderivation nor mathematical calculations. Bartocci claimed that
brEinstein was aware of De Prettoâ€?s speculation of E=â??mc2
, which was
brpublished about a year before.
p5. Fritz Hasenohrl in 1904, concluded: �to the mechanical
mass of our
brsystem must be added an apparent mass which is given by, m=8E/3c2 where
brE is the energy of the radiation.� In a later paper he
further
brimproved result that mass exchanged is, m=4E/3c2. Ebenezer Cunningham
brin 1914 in the book The Principles of Relativity showed that F.
brHasenöhrl, had made a slight error in his calculations.
If errors are
brremoved then the mass exchanged is m =E/c2 or E = mc2. Thus in this
brregard Hasenohrl�s contribution is the most significant,
before
brEinstein.
p6. Frederick Soddi and M. Henri Becquerel both have predicted that in
brradioactive emissions the mass of body decreases i.e. energy of
brradiations is at the cost of mass.
p7. Max Planck in 1907 made an in-depth investigation of the energy
br"confined" within a body, but he did not use Einstein�s
approach at
brall. Planck derived an expression m-M= E/c2, for heat energy and mass
brand interpreted that
p� The inertia mass of body is altered by absorption or
emission of
brheat energy. The increments of mass of body are equal to heat energy
brdivided by square of speed of light.�
pPlanck acknowledged Einstein�s previous derivation but
did not agree
brwith correctness of Einstein�s derivation.
brShould these scientists be given credit of doing basic work in
brassisting the discovery of E=mc2 ?
pToday, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein.
brComplied from various sources.
brIf some scientists is left , please add. I think one is JJ Thomson
brMain sources for compilation
p100 Years of E=mc2
bra href="https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554" https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4 554/a
p_________________
bra href="https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554" https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4 554/a/blockquote
/html

--------------01B7277BADBEEE966D126B0D--

Impeach Bush

Are you ****ed enough, Come to street,
YOU WILL BE ****ED TO SATISFACTION.

AJAY SHARMA wrote:
self advertisment snipped

But it is well known that the paper that you keep self-advertising is
all wrong, idiot.

Dono wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
self advertisment snipped

But it is well known that the paper that you keep self-advertising is
all wrong, idiot.
---------------------------------------
Dono
Can you prove it wrong ?
I will stop posting.

If somebody disagree then one can write to Editor Physics Essays
addressing the following issues.

What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
What is Planck’s observation regarding it?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
Why Einstein did not generalize the same?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharma’s paper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905
paper.
How Editors/referees who have published it are WRONG?
How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations AND EQAUTIONS?
My paper answers all above questions.
It follows from Einstein’s derivation under legitimate conditions,(in
some cases) that
when Light Energy is Emitted , mass of body INCREASES.
It is incorrect deduction from Einstein’s derivation.

Part IV
References.

References of Einstein’s work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharma’s work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
�The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation �E = Ac2 �M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology�.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow, (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York ,
USA)

AJAY SHARMA 5 NOV 2006