|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU
Dr PASKEN,
Robert Pasken Department of Earth and AtmosphericSciences Saint Louis University 3507 Laclede Avenue St.Louis, MO 63103 Part I Your OBJETION was momentum is not conserved in my paper. It is conserved, you are absolutely wrong. It is simple interpretation of 11th class physics. I have pasted my reply in number of posts, but you failed to respond. I will again put it here.. See one link http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Kindly address this issue. Also see that I am polite in my posts , if someone goes out of way , then things are different. Defend on the comments you have made made. This work is published in international journals and conferences. It is correct. Part II Well , I respond politely number of time. But if someone does not understand that language , then answer in his language, (i) Dr Inpain , is not a CERN at all. He boasted THAT HE IS AT CERN and runs Nuclear Reactors SO THAT HIS his wrong arguments are accepted .. ON 28th Sep 2006 , I clarified then Head TP CERN said he is not at all associated with CERN. For CHEATS AND LIAR THEERE IS NO PLACE in scientific discussions. He used absurd language, and he was served in that. AN YOU SEE THE WORDS HE USED, FIRST When you are able to defend YOUR own WRONG comments, now you remember him. How you are wrong see the link , http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Number of ties I asked him to write to the Editor of the journal, but he did not. HE COULD NOT DEFEND HIS ARGUMENTS SCIENTIFICALLY. (ii) Your other quotation , He too made absurd remarks. Now you talk about his NAMELESS POST , where there is no mention of place he works and what is his actual place. God Bless you Dr Pasken, This post is NOTHING nut my equations. Just put value of phi =98 then equations in the pot reduce to my equations. This post confirms my equations and deductions. What do you want MORE . Juts try to read and understand. Par III If You disagree then one can write to Editor Physics Essays addressing the following issues. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper? What are conditions under which it is derived? What is Planck’s observation regarding it? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? Why Einstein did not generalize the same? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s paper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper. How Editors/referees who have published it are WRONG? How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations AND EQAUTIONS? My paper answers all above questions. It follows from Einstein’s derivation under legitimate conditions,(in some cases) that when Light Energy is Emitted , mass of body INCREASES. It is incorrect deduction from Einstein’s derivation. Part IV References. References of Einstein’s work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York , USA) AJAY SHARMA 6 NOV 2006 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU
AJAY SHARMA wrote: Dr PASKEN, Robert Pasken Department of Earth and AtmosphericSciences Saint Louis University 3507 Laclede Avenue St.Louis, MO 63103 Part I Your OBJETION was momentum is not conserved in my paper. It is conserved, you are absolutely wrong. It is simple interpretation of 11th class physics. I have pasted my reply in number of posts, but you failed to respond. I will again put it here.. See one link http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Kindly address this issue. Also see that I am polite in my posts , if someone goes out of way , then things are different. Defend on the comments you have made made. This work is published in international journals and conferences. It is correct. Part II Well , I respond politely number of time. But if someone does not understand that language , then answer in his language, (i) Dr Inpain , is not a CERN at all. He boasted THAT HE IS AT CERN and runs Nuclear Reactors SO THAT HIS his wrong arguments are accepted . ON 28th Sep 2006 , I clarified then Head TP CERN said he is not at all associated with CERN. For CHEATS AND LIAR THEERE IS NO PLACE in scientific discussions. He used absurd language, and he was served in that. AN YOU SEE THE WORDS HE USED, FIRST When you are able to defend YOUR own WRONG comments, now you remember him. How you are wrong see the link , http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Number of ties I asked him to write to the Editor of the journal, but he did not. HE COULD NOT DEFEND HIS ARGUMENTS SCIENTIFICALLY. (ii) Your other quotation , He too made absurd remarks. Now you talk about his NAMELESS POST , where there is no mention of place he works and what is his actual place. God Bless you Dr Pasken, This post is NOTHING nut my equations. Just put value of phi =98 then equations in the pot reduce to my equations. This post confirms my equations and deductions. What do you want MORE . Juts try to read and understand. Par III If You disagree then one can write to Editor Physics Essays addressing the following issues. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper? What are conditions under which it is derived? What is Planck’s observation regarding it? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? Why Einstein did not generalize the same? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s paper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper. How Editors/referees who have published it are WRONG? How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations AND EQAUTIONS? My paper answers all above questions. It follows from Einstein’s derivation under legitimate conditions,(in some cases) that when Light Energy is Emitted , mass of body INCREASES. It is incorrect deduction from Einstein’s derivation. Part IV References. References of Einstein’s work . A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York , USA) AJAY SHARMA 6 NOV 2006 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU
AJAY SHARMA wrote: AJAY SHARMA wrote: Dr PASKEN, Robert Pasken Department of Earth and AtmosphericSciences Saint Louis University 3507 Laclede Avenue St.Louis, MO 63103 Part I Your OBJETION was momentum is not conserved in my paper. It is conserved, you are absolutely wrong. It is simple interpretation of 11th class physics. I have pasted my reply in number of posts, but you failed to respond. I will again put it here.. See one link http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Kindly address this issue. Also see that I am polite in my posts , if someone goes out of way , then things are different. Defend on the comments you have made made. This work is published in international journals and conferences. It is correct. Part II Well , I respond politely number of time. But if someone does not understand that language , then answer in his language, (i) Dr Inpain , is not a CERN at all. He boasted THAT HE IS AT CERN and runs Nuclear Reactors SO THAT HIS his wrong arguments are accepted . ON 28th Sep 2006 , I clarified then Head TP CERN said he is not at all associated with CERN. For CHEATS AND LIAR THEERE IS NO PLACE in scientific discussions. He used absurd language, and he was served in that. AN YOU SEE THE WORDS HE USED, FIRST When you are able to defend YOUR own WRONG comments, now you remember him. How you are wrong see the link , http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Number of ties I asked him to write to the Editor of the journal, but he did not. HE COULD NOT DEFEND HIS ARGUMENTS SCIENTIFICALLY. (ii) Your other quotation , He too made absurd remarks. Now you talk about his NAMELESS POST , where there is no mention of place he works and what is his actual place. God Bless you Dr Pasken, This post is NOTHING nut my equations. Just put value of phi =98 then equations in the pot reduce to my equations. This post confirms my equations and deductions. What do you want MORE . Juts try to read and understand. Par III If You disagree then one can write to Editor Physics Essays addressing the following issues. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper? What are conditions under which it is derived? What is Planck’s observation regarding it? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? Why Einstein did not generalize the same? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s paper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper. How Editors/referees who have published it are WRONG? How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations AND EQAUTIONS? My paper answers all above questions. It follows from Einstein’s derivation under legitimate conditions,(in some cases) that when Light Energy is Emitted , mass of body INCREASES. It is incorrect deduction from Einstein’s derivation. Part IV References. References of Einstein’s work . A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York , USA) AJAY SHARMA 6 NOV 2006 ----------------------------------------- Here is the reply http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU
ma wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote: AJAY SHARMA wrote: Dr PASKEN, Robert Pasken Department of Earth and AtmosphericSciences Saint Louis University 3507 Laclede Avenue St.Louis, MO 63103 Part I Your OBJETION was momentum is not conserved in my paper. It is conserved, you are absolutely wrong. It is simple interpretation of 11th class physics. I have pasted my reply in number of posts, but you failed to respond. I will again put it here.. See one link http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Kindly address this issue. Also see that I am polite in my posts , if someone goes out of way , then things are different. Defend on the comments you have made made. This work is published in international journals and conferences. It is correct. Part II Well , I respond politely number of time. But if someone does not understand that language , then answer in his language, (i) Dr Inpain , is not a CERN at all. He boasted THAT HE IS AT CERN and runs Nuclear Reactors SO THAT HIS his wrong arguments are accepted . ON 28th Sep 2006 , I clarified then Head TP CERN said he is not at all associated with CERN. For CHEATS AND LIAR THEERE IS NO PLACE in scientific discussions. He used absurd language, and he was served in that. AN YOU SEE THE WORDS HE USED, FIRST When you are able to defend YOUR own WRONG comments, now you remember him. How you are wrong see the link , http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Number of ties I asked him to write to the Editor of the journal, but he did not. HE COULD NOT DEFEND HIS ARGUMENTS SCIENTIFICALLY. (ii) Your other quotation , He too made absurd remarks. Now you talk about his NAMELESS POST , where there is no mention of place he works and what is his actual place. God Bless you Dr Pasken, This post is NOTHING nut my equations. Just put value of phi =98 then equations in the pot reduce to my equations. This post confirms my equations and deductions. What do you want MORE . Juts try to read and understand. Par III If You disagree then one can write to Editor Physics Essays addressing the following issues. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper? What are conditions under which it is derived? What is Planck’s observation regarding it? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? Why Einstein did not generalize the same? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s paper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper. How Editors/referees who have published it are WRONG? How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations AND EQAUTIONS? My paper answers all above questions. It follows from Einstein’s derivation under legitimate conditions,(in some cases) that when Light Energy is Emitted , mass of body INCREASES. It is incorrect deduction from Einstein’s derivation. Part IV References. References of Einstein’s work . A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York , USA) AJAY SHARMA 6 NOV 2006 ----------------------------------------- Here is the reply http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --------------------------------------- 100 Years of E=mc2 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einstein’s derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein’s 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einstein’s derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. [b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s paper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. All the references are given below for the purpose. There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharma’s work is incorrectly published. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they don’t exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book will be published in Dec. 2006 It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences ..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic science. This book will status as Newton’s Principia or Galileo’s Dialogue have in science. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einstein’s work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past, present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU
Ajay Sharma's sock puppet wrote
Part II Well , I respond politely number of time. But if someone does not understand that language , then answer in his language, (i) Dr Inpain , is not a CERN at all. He boasted THAT HE IS AT CERN and runs Nuclear Reactors SO THAT HIS his wrong arguments are accepted . ON 28th Sep 2006 , I clarified then Head TP CERN said he is not at all associated with CERN. For CHEATS AND LIAR THEERE IS NO PLACE in scientific discussions. He used absurd language, and he was served in that. AN YOU SEE THE WORDS HE USED, FIRST When you are able to defend YOUR own WRONG comments, now you remember him. Even though I have repeatedly explained to you: There is NO Dr. Inpain at CERN. It is an alias for a Ph.D. (Dr.) scientist at CERN who is IN PAIN (get it! Dr. Inpain). You indicated just how little you understand when actually contacted CERN to look for a Dr. Inpain (just as a reminder again: he is a Ph.D. scientist at CERN who is IN PAIN after reading your drivel). You are absolutely correct when you state: For CHEATS AND LIAR THEERE IS NO PLACE in scientific discussions. You are the cheat and liar. You resort to racial slurs |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU
wrote: Ajay Sharma's sock puppet wrote Part II Well , I respond politely number of time. But if someone does not understand that language , then answer in his language, (i) Dr Inpain , is not a CERN at all. He boasted THAT HE IS AT CERN and runs Nuclear Reactors SO THAT HIS his wrong arguments are accepted . ON 28th Sep 2006 , I clarified then Head TP CERN said he is not at all associated with CERN. For CHEATS AND LIAR THEERE IS NO PLACE in scientific discussions. He used absurd language, and he was served in that. AN YOU SEE THE WORDS HE USED, FIRST When you are able to defend YOUR own WRONG comments, now you remember him. Even though I have repeatedly explained to you: There is NO Dr. Inpain at CERN. It is an alias for a Ph.D. (Dr.) scientist at CERN who is IN PAIN (get it! Dr. Inpain). You indicated just how little you understand when actually contacted CERN to look for a Dr. Inpain (just as a reminder again: he is a Ph.D. scientist at CERN who is IN PAIN after reading your drivel). You are absolutely correct when you state: For CHEATS AND LIAR THEERE IS NO PLACE in scientific discussions. You are the cheat and liar. You resort to racial slurs ================================= , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2 Robert Pasken Department of Earth and AtmosphericSciences Saint Louis University 3507 Laclede Avenue St.Louis, MO 63103 See how Momentum is conserved in my paper. All references are given in the end. http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Part I General meaning , explained in 11th class Physics. The law of momentum conservation, * In an isolated system, the momentum of system must be conserved.* Mathematically implies that Initial Momentum = Final Momentum mu=mv (1) As mass remains same in classical mechanics. So u=v which is Newton’s First law of motion. Application of momentum conservation. When body emits energy ( in this cases light energy) then it recoils .Thus it is used to calculate the velocity of recoil. It can be applied to following two cases. ------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest. ( body does not recoil with noticeable velocity, it tends to recoil) The velocity cam be calculated but may be of the order of 1/100000000000000000000000000000000000 m/s or 10-^40m/s This case resembles with Einstein’s two waves of equal energy emitted in opposite directions. -----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward. the velocity can be calculated from conservation of momentum i.e. initial momentum =final momentum Vrecoil = mv/M ~ 5m/s (say) Thus after emission of energy BODY MAY REMAIN AT REST OR MOVE, the Momentum is Conserved. It is basic physics of 11th standard. If some one does not want to understand this then it his problem. Einstein did all calculation under Classical conditions of velocity (v c, her v is relative velocity between two systems i.e. system in which body emits light and second system in which energy is measured. Part II The law of conservation of momentum is obeyed in my paper. https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 When two waves are emitted. The body recoils with velocity v , with magnitude of the order of 10^-32 m/s i.e. V (recoil)=1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 It can be easily calculated. When two waves of different energies are emitted. If body emits two light waves of slightly different energies i.e. 0.5001L and 0.4999L (Einstein has used light waves of energy 0.5L and 0.5L) in opposite directions. Now using the law of conservation of momentum, it can be easily justified that in this case body remains at rest. Let the body of mass 10kg emits light energy in two waves in visible region equal to 7.9512×10^-19 J, this energy corresponds to TWO light waves in visible region having wavelength 5000ºA or energy, 2hc/λ or 7.9512×10^-19 J. Let towards the observer the body emits light energy 0.5001L i.e. 3.97639512×10^-19 J i.e. will have momentum ( p1 = E/c) 1.32546504×10^-27 m/s. Secondly, the body emits light wave of energy 0.4999L i.e. 3.97480488×10^-19 J, away from the observer (φ= 180º) i.e. will have momentum ( p2 = E/c) 1.32493496×10^-27 m/s. Let us assume that when the body emits light waves of energy and moves (if it actually does) with velocity Vb , then according to law of conservation of momentum we get 0 = p1 +p2 +MbVb or Vb = -(p1 +p2) /Mb = –5.3×10^-32 m/s (2) 0 = p1 +p2 +MbVb or Vb = -(p1 +p2) /Mb = –5.3×10^-32 m/s (3) Thus conservation of momentum requires that body should move with velocity –5.3×10^-32 m/s opposite to observer. Thus body will tend to move with velocity 5.3×10^-32 m/s ( away from the observer) which is immeasurably small by all means, hence the body remains at rest. Due to this uniform relative velocity v of the system (ξ, η, ζ ) will not change, if body moves then v will vary accordingly. References of Einstein’s work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past, present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |