Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On May 26, 5:44 pm, josephus wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 25, 2:43 pm, josephus wrote:
lets talk about accelerations. and the definition of excess escape velocity.

first off an orbit is constrained and the energy function is
negative. -- a fact of life any bound orbit will have negative
energy. so a circular orbit is V^2 = GM/R to escape completely
from the orbit. the V = (2)^1/2 * Vcircular.

that little bit of extra energy will escape the system. in real
terms that little bit of energy would be 1.4121 times any circurlar
speed to escape from that orbit. whether elliptical or circular.
a. a moon would escape from the earth
b a planet would escape from the sun.

any passing object ( sirius or any other sun) would
exchange energy with the planets and moons and as it swoops by. they
would bobble and leave the solar system. the problem is delineated in
"Astrodynamics" by Bates, Mueller and White. Dover 1971 easy reading
If you know a little bit of calculus and and lot of algebra.

thats ok Brad does not read that kind of stuff.

josephus

Why is josephus having to talk as though less than child?

Are you Muslim, and thus deathly afraid of using computers, or
cameras?

In addition to your having ignored the Sirius star/solar system recent
loss of 4+ solar mass, and having further ignored the stellar binary
considerations that would become trinary once our solar system was
close enough. So, where’s that supercomputer simulation?

4+ solar mass loss? did you just make that up. please show us a
reference to a news release or even, god forbid, a juried magazine.
otherwise this is just an unsupported assertion by imagination.

An impressive Sirius-B went from 6 solar mass, into its red giant
phase and rather quickly spent itself all the way down to one solar
mass of a white dwarf, whereas Sirius-A most likely picked up one of
those solar mass units, of which leaves the Sirius star system short 4
solar mass.


Apparently you have not even bothered to run the basic of moon
impacting Earth simulations that clearly proves otherwise. How sad
and pathetic at the same time.

why dont you look up celestial mechanics and orbital motions

For pretty much the same reason you're not doing as I'd nicely asked.


This limited method is not the least bit all-inclusive, but have you
ever run the basic online crater simulator? (apparently not)
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/
. - Brad Guth

josephus
-- It is true that the person making the claim should show the
proof that is approved by the opposition. brad the clueless tries to
pass the research of to the opposition. and that is not how science is
done.

Since nothing outside the mainstream box is ever approved by your
intellectual cartel opposition, perhaps you should tell, why are you
here?
. - Brad Guth