|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Eaten out of house and home
Although posters here obviously find its funny, we are running a international space station on a wing and a prayer... one day when we loose the station another safety board will condem those involved. .. .. End the dangerous wasteful shuttle now before it kills any more astronauts.... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I'm fairly certain that some of you may have noticed this topic located
within sci.space.station; Relocation of ISS to ME-L1 Essentially, even though I'm considered the ultimate village idiot by a few if not all forum insiders, in spite of that title, I'm all for the likes of salvaging ISS, that is if there's a moon involved in it's future. Otherwise, the hell with it (make the damn thing reenter over NYC on the next 4th of July, as they deserve something spectacular that's not smashing into yet another tall building). Unfortunately, some may have not identified with this topic or perhaps dare not since this efffort is growing in spite of certain individuals that'll bash such topics for sport and/or if possible banish whatever is outside of their mainstream box. Thus mostly this is another honest effort at my own capacity, with the jest of it offering something like the following; I've previously agreed with many that perceive our extremely old and mostly cold-war configured shuttles are simply providing more likelihood of accidents to come, not to mention their truly horrific impact upon the environment, and that's also excluding the rather pesky nature of their having to survive our Boeing/TRW Phantom Works ABL team being airborne at the same time of their reentry that's only improving the odds of something much worse going a bit further over the edge of whatever slim safety margin there is. The prospects of larger and more capable AI/robotic fly-by-rocket solutions from Russia or perhaps China are simply a must-have, as even for the prospects of transporting crew there's no need of the usual flight crew because, there'd be nothing to do unless all three backup systems failed. Personal reentry pods or coffins would be included as last resort, which is far better off than anything shuttle related. Most of what ISS needs is fuel and spare parts, not a crew change every few months, as 6+ month durations should be sufficient, though relocated to ME-L1 might suggest annual crew rotation as being the norm. BTW; since this ongoing perverted notion of relocating ISS once and for all somewhere that it'll actually accomplish the most good for science as well as humanity is a fairly spendy proposition. However, since it'll only expedite the eventual replacement by the LSE-CM/ISS, I thought that perhaps I alone could pay for everything related to getting ISS relocated to ME-L1, or at least I'd be willing to share and share alike by way of matching funds. Of what's needed is something on paper (a few reams might actually become necessary in this case) that we can each sort of take to the bank for obtaining the necessary billions as advancements upon whatever this adventure should require. Actually, since this task is getting us not only back to the moon in style, but most likely providing the one and only viable alternative as for our team to be getting itself safely to/from the lunar surface via tether pods. As such I thought perhaps my good buddy and friends for life (the GW Bush family and the likes of Dick's Halburton) would cough up the necessary investment bucks. In fact, a good portion if not everything can be funded by those Saddam and Osama bin Laden bank and investment accounts that we supposedly already have control over, thus not one thin dime need be borrowed from the privet sector or taxpayers, just the usual insiders like Martha Stewart, ENRON, Arthur Andersen and lo and behold, we'd subsequently OWN THE FREAKING MOON! I mean to say; how absolutely good is that, or what? Regards, Brad GUTH / GASA~IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I'm fairly certain that some of you may have noticed this topic located
within sci.space.station; Relocation of ISS to ME-L1 Essentially, even though I'm considered the ultimate village idiot by a few if not all forum insiders, in spite of that title, I'm all for the likes of salvaging ISS, that is if there's a moon involved in it's future. Otherwise, the hell with it (make the damn thing reenter over NYC on the next 4th of July, as they deserve something spectacular that's not smashing into yet another tall building). Unfortunately, some may have not identified with this topic or perhaps dare not since this efffort is growing in spite of certain individuals that'll bash such topics for sport and/or if possible banish whatever is outside of their mainstream box. Thus mostly this is another honest effort at my own capacity, with the jest of it offering something like the following; I've previously agreed with many that perceive our extremely old and mostly cold-war configured shuttles are simply providing more likelihood of accidents to come, not to mention their truly horrific impact upon the environment, and that's also excluding the rather pesky nature of their having to survive our Boeing/TRW Phantom Works ABL team being airborne at the same time of their reentry that's only improving the odds of something much worse going a bit further over the edge of whatever slim safety margin there is. The prospects of larger and more capable AI/robotic fly-by-rocket solutions from Russia or perhaps China are simply a must-have, as even for the prospects of transporting crew there's no need of the usual flight crew because, there'd be nothing to do unless all three backup systems failed. Personal reentry pods or coffins would be included as last resort, which is far better off than anything shuttle related. Most of what ISS needs is fuel and spare parts, not a crew change every few months, as 6+ month durations should be sufficient, though relocated to ME-L1 might suggest annual crew rotation as being the norm. BTW; since this ongoing perverted notion of relocating ISS once and for all somewhere that it'll actually accomplish the most good for science as well as humanity is a fairly spendy proposition. However, since it'll only expedite the eventual replacement by the LSE-CM/ISS, I thought that perhaps I alone could pay for everything related to getting ISS relocated to ME-L1, or at least I'd be willing to share and share alike by way of matching funds. Of what's needed is something on paper (a few reams might actually become necessary in this case) that we can each sort of take to the bank for obtaining the necessary billions as advancements upon whatever this adventure should require. Actually, since this task is getting us not only back to the moon in style, but most likely providing the one and only viable alternative as for our team to be getting itself safely to/from the lunar surface via tether pods. As such I thought perhaps my good buddy and friends for life (the GW Bush family and the likes of Dick's Halburton) would cough up the necessary investment bucks. In fact, a good portion if not everything can be funded by those Saddam and Osama bin Laden bank and investment accounts that we supposedly already have control over, thus not one thin dime need be borrowed from the privet sector or taxpayers, just the usual insiders like Martha Stewart, ENRON, Arthur Andersen and lo and behold, we'd subsequently OWN THE FREAKING MOON! I mean to say; how absolutely good is that, or what? Regards, Brad GUTH / GASA~IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Brad Guth" wrote in message oups.com... I'm fairly certain that some of you may have noticed this topic located within sci.space.station We certainly noticed that you once again changed your email address. Back into the killfile with you. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
bob haller wrote:
one day when we loose the station another safety board will condem those involved. dammit would you please say lose instead of loose. The word is lose, like when did you lose your mind. You make this goddam mistake in almost every post. You are a ****ing illiterate. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Revision" k@tdot-com wrote in message ... bob haller wrote: one day when we loose the station another safety board will condem those involved. dammit would you please say lose instead of loose. The word is lose, like when did you lose your mind. You make this goddam mistake in almost every post. You are a ****ing illiterate. And you're only figuring this out now? Lose/loose is only the least of Bob's posting issues. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Astral Form - Crookes work (part 2) | expert | Misc | 0 | April 13th 04 12:05 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |