A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » FITS
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[fitsbits] Interpretation of repeat count in binary tables

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 1st 08, 04:02 AM posted to sci.astro.fits
William Pence[_2_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 44
Default [fitsbits] Interpretation of repeat count in binary tables


In the example you cite below, the binary table contains 12288 rows of
data, and each row contains 3 vectors, containing 1024 single precision
floating point numbers leash. There is no explicit relationship between
the vectors in different rows of the table. Structurally, the table
begins with the 1024 element vector in the first column and first row,
followed by the vectors in the 2nd and 3rd columns in the first row.
These are followed by the 3 vectors in the 2nd row, then the 3rd row,
and finally ending with the 3 vectors in the 12288th row.

The TDIMn keyword, if present in this case, would specify the
dimensionality of each individual 1024 element vector in that column.
For example, TDIM1 = '(16,64)', would mean that each vector in column 1
should be interpreted as a 16 x 64 2D array. If there is no TDIMn
keyword, then the vector would be interpreted as a 1024 element 1-D array.

Bill Pence

Paddy Leahy wrote:
Is the repeat count in TFORM descriptors provided purely for efficiency
reasons, or does it have some implications for the logical structure of
the data? Specifically, suppose we have

NAXIS1 = 12288 / width of table in bytes
NAXIS2 = 12288 / number of rows in table
TFORM1 = '1024E'
TFORM2 = '1024E'
TFORM3 = '1024E'

Should the three columns each be interpreted as a 1024 x 12288 element
2-D array, or as a 12582912-element 1-D array? The first implies that if
TFORMn = 'rTa', the default value of TDIMn = '(r)'. The second implies
that if TDIMn is not explicitly specified then the repeat count is just
provided for (rather spurious) efficiency reasons. Some FITS writers
certainly use it as such.

This question arises out of pure ignorance, but I have failed to find an
answer in either the original binary table paper (Cotton et al 1995) or
the current (2.0) or draft (3.0) FITS standards. In fact, none of these
documents give any hint as to what the repeat count is for (unless TDIMn
is explicitly present, or it is a character field).


__________________________________________________ __________________
Dr. William Pence
NASA/GSFC Code 662 HEASARC +1-301-286-4599 (voice)
Greenbelt MD 20771 +1-301-286-1684 (fax)


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[fitsbits] Interpretation of repeat count in binary tables Paddy Leahy FITS 0 March 30th 08 05:39 PM
[fitsbits] Packed binary values Steve Allen FITS 0 April 30th 07 06:28 PM
[fitsbits] Packed binary values William Pence FITS 0 April 30th 07 05:37 PM
[fitsbits] Packed binary values Thierry Forveille FITS 0 April 30th 07 04:19 PM
[fitsbits] Packed binary values Mike Nolan FITS 0 April 27th 07 04:42 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2020 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.