![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They measured gravity waves from colliding neutron stars and black holes, how much more difficult would it be to measure gravity loss? They call the dimension "the Bulk" which theoretically lives below our universe. Since gravity isn't bound to anything, some of the gravity of things in our universe must leak into the Bulk. So how hard would it be to measure a lack of gravity for something like the Earth or Moon?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Criticism of the terms "Zero Gravity" and "Microgravity" | [email protected] | Space Station | 10 | August 28th 19 01:11 PM |
The Practice of Self-Justification for Applied Quantum "Physical" Mathematics | American | Policy | 0 | April 13th 11 05:32 PM |
Criticism of the terms "Zero Gravity" and "Microgravity" | [email protected] | Space Station | 6 | April 8th 09 09:47 PM |
SolderSmoke #43: LP Filters, Titan, Feedback amps, Return Loss Bridges, "Gonzo Gizmos" | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | December 13th 06 07:42 PM |
R. Kiehn's "physical vacuum" and my "emergent gravity." | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 24th 06 07:55 AM |