|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NASA Colorizes Its Photos
APOD: June 12, 1999 - Venus: Just Passing By
.... Each day a different image or photograph of our ... Venus: Just Passing By Credit: Galileo Project, JPL, NASA. ... This colorized image of Venus was recorded by the ... antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990612.html cached | more results from this site THE SOLAR SYSTEM .... My photograph of the waxing crescent Moon and Venus ... searched out the planets from Venus to Saturn ... Digitized, sanitized, and colorized images of every planet ... darkskyinstitute.org/solar.html cached Space Today Online - Exploring the Red Planet - Mars Global ... .... (how nasa colorized the image ... NASA scientists think Mars Observer's propulsion system failed, blasting the ... has a battery of cameras to photograph the entire ... http://www.spacetoday.org/SolSys/Mar...lSurveyor.html cached SciScoop || Unique Photo From Mars Orbit Captures Earth, Moon, ... .... and white, and then Earth was colorized by converting ... a complete description of how the photograph was processed ... the Mars Orbiter Camera for NASA, using spare ... www.sciscoop.com/story/2003/5/22/124910/033 cached Full Moon .... I wanted to go to the Moon and photograph there -- but the ... of the landscape below are "constructed" and colorized from raw digital data: NASA's "false radar ... www.projectfullmoon.com/qa.html cached html head /headbodypre Picture Gallery Topic Side 2 ... .... 14-11] 1197 51395 Rings of Uranus, colorized [ETU.14 ... NASA scanner screen [ETU.19-14] 14122 51565 Parts of ... of [ETU.3-12a] 31721 51611 Moon photograph compared to ... www.williams.edu/Astronomy/jay/video_vol2.txt cached Mars Global Surveyor .... The colorized photograph shows Earth from 86 million miles away ... today by the camera team for NASA's Mars Global ... planet has some similarity to Earth and Venus. ... www.marsnews.com/missions/mgs/ cached UFO MAN Contemplates ALL the Planets .... This colorized picture of Venus was taken on February ... the thermal emission imaging system of NASA's 2001 Mars ... Space Telescope was able to photograph Uranus in ... seekers.100megs6.com/UFOManContemplatesAllPlanets+more.htm cached Pioneer 10 Virtual Conference Transcript .... This is a serial photograph employs another technology very ... we had Pioneers 6s which is what NASA Ames started ... This is the colorized version, Ted Turner got to ... quest.arc.nasa.gov/sso/cool/pioneer10/general/amtwotxt.html cached Astronomy Stamps .... On the bottom you see NASA's Compton g-ray ... have been processed, and in some cases colorized, for scientific ... A 1949 black-and-white photograph of Hubble, posing ... www.wncc.net/courses/aveh/lecture/briefmark.htm cached Aerospace Scientific Research on photos of the surface of Mars .... Photos courtesy of NASA, enhanced, corrected & colorized by Mark Williams .... The Cydonia photograph is a somewhat fuzzy image captured from extreme altitude ... nasa. ... http://www.scientific.co.uk/aerospac...urfacemars.htm cached Sagan Medal Address .... by journalists and media people to photograph, he just ... an ex-scientist astronaut from NASA) who suggested ... Now, they are colorized to this bright orange color. ... www.boulder.swri.edu/clark/sagan/talk.html cached \input /home/impey/text/tex/citmac (MICROSOFT WORD) .... New image of NASA’s Great Observatories ... old 14-16, needs to be jazzed up and colorized. ... Replace sentence ?While a photograph can?in a digital form.? with ... zeno.as.arizona.edu/~impey/textbook/ur2notes.doc view as html consumptive.org .... NASA's highly detailed color images of the "blue marble ... at 21:41. This is Not a Photograph - works by ... setting, cable release, tripod mount, colorized bodies, and ... http://www.consumptive.org/weblog/ar...1_archive.html cached html head /headbodypreNewsgroups: alt.religion. ... .... when they arrived, they looked just like the photograph in the ... that my imvention had significant use for > NASA and utilized ... (and colorized iMacs) Battlestar ... www.kibo.com/rawdata/1999/1999-01-13.txt cached |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Flying _Naked_People" http://www.rcip.com/nerdgerl/email.htm wrote in message ... consumptive.org ... NASA's highly detailed color images of the "blue marble ... at 21:41. This is Not a Photograph - works by ... setting, cable release, tripod mount, colorized bodies, and ... ...it is all a fake...blah blah blah...prove it...blah blah blah...it is all a fake....blah blah blah...I don't believe you....blah blah blah...it is all a fake... plonk Phew! Sally |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Flying _Naked_People" http://www.rcip.com/nerdgerl/email.htm wrote in message ... APOD: June 12, 1999 - Venus: Just Passing By ... Each day a different image or photograph of our ... Venus: Just Passing By Credit: Galileo Project, JPL, NASA. ... This colorized image of Venus was recorded by the ... antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990612.html cached | more results from this site Etc. etc. As I mentioned in my earlier post of this morning, I suspect you are misunderstanding the word "colorize" (which is not entirely your fault since most of the websites you quote misuse the term). "Colorize" originally meant (and still means when used correctly) adding color arbitrarily to a B&W image---as old movies are sometimes colorized. I think this is the definition you used when you originally brought the matter up. If so, this is not what NASA does. Strictly speaking, what NASA does is "color enhancement". A few of the websites you quote actually go to the trouble of explaining what they meant by the word "colorize" and (if you will go to the trouble of reading them), you will see that what I say is true. For instance, the very first site you quote has a link to a page that explains how the "colorization" of an image was accomplished. (And the fact that you did not give the direct URL to this page leads me to think that you only listed the results of a search for "NASA" and "colorization" and did not actually bother to read what you found.) That explanation is he http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/sci/earth/index.html Another term often used in this sort of processing is "false color". This is a much more accurate and much less misleading description than "colorization", which implies that color is being added to a B&W images. Here is a nice little website that I often steer students to: http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/mars/teach...displcont.html It goes a long way toward explaining just what "color enhancement" means and how it is done. I hope it will allay some of your doubts about what is being done and for what reasons. RM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ron Miller wrote in article
... What you are trying to establish, I take it, is that NASA takes B&W images and "fakes" the color in them. This is not the case at all. And before you ask: this is something about which I have considerable experience. I am an author and illustrator specializing in astronomical subjects (my most recent series of books just received the 2003 American Institute of Physics Award of Excellence for Science Writing). As an illustrator, I have worked with NASA imaging and imagery for 30 years and have intimate knowledge of the processes involved. I have handled the raw images as they have come directly from the spacecraft and know precisely what happens to them in the process of enhancement and why this enhancement is done (for one thing, it is important to me when creating an illustration to depict a place as it really looks and not as it appears in an enhanced image). There are a vast number of ways in which the information contained in a photo can be extracted by such manipulation, some of which involve converting portions of a B&W image into color by means of filters, computers, etc. But this is done in order to enhance features for scientific study, not to introduce arbitrary colors. Perhaps the closet that NASA comes to doing what you seem to want to prove is in many of its radar images of the surface of Venus, which are often reproduced in an overall orangish-yellow tint. If Venus is "reproduced" as orangish-yellow, what color is it **Really**? Oh, and don't bother answering if that question is too STUPID for you. After all, I can just dial up NASA and expect an answer. RM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you. I am bookmarking these sites right now.
Ron Miller wrote in article ... "Flying _Naked_People" http://www.rcip.com/nerdgerl/email.htm wrote in message ... APOD: June 12, 1999 - Venus: Just Passing By ... Each day a different image or photograph of our ... Venus: Just Passing By Credit: Galileo Project, JPL, NASA. ... This colorized image of Venus was recorded by the ... antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990612.html cached | more results from this site Etc. etc. As I mentioned in my earlier post of this morning, I suspect you are misunderstanding the word "colorize" (which is not entirely your fault since most of the websites you quote misuse the term). "Colorize" originally meant (and still means when used correctly) adding color arbitrarily to a B&W image---as old movies are sometimes colorized. I think this is the definition you used when you originally brought the matter up. If so, this is not what NASA does. Strictly speaking, what NASA does is "color enhancement". A few of the websites you quote actually go to the trouble of explaining what they meant by the word "colorize" and (if you will go to the trouble of reading them), you will see that what I say is true. For instance, the very first site you quote has a link to a page that explains how the "colorization" of an image was accomplished. (And the fact that you did not give the direct URL to this page leads me to think that you only listed the results of a search for "NASA" and "colorization" and did not actually bother to read what you found.) That explanation is he http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/sci/earth/index.html Another term often used in this sort of processing is "false color". This is a much more accurate and much less misleading description than "colorization", which implies that color is being added to a B&W images. Here is a nice little website that I often steer students to: http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/mars/teach...displcont.html It goes a long way toward explaining just what "color enhancement" means and how it is done. I hope it will allay some of your doubts about what is being done and for what reasons. RM |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
pinkling wrote in article
et... On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 03:24:38 -0000 in , "Flying _Naked_People" http://www.rcip.com/nerdgerl/email.htm graced the world with this thought: lameass rant snipped Go back to the Kennedy assasination conspiracy... has it occurred to you that you aren't telling anyone something they don't know... nor are you telling anyone anything they give a flying **** about? Yet your STUPID Ass read it, and replied. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Ok so for the rest of us ignorant cretins crawling on this planet, how are we
able to discern the actual colors of these planets? If I were to get a color picture that hasn't been "enhanced", would toning down the contrast portray a more accurate image? And I am amazed to see how earth looked from mars. It showed no detail at all and gave no indication of the land here. That makes me wonder if most of the planets we see from earth suffer the same perspective. Ron Miller wrote in article ... As I mentioned in my earlier post of this morning, I suspect you are misunderstanding the word "colorize" (which is not entirely your fault since most of the websites you quote misuse the term). "Colorize" originally meant (and still means when used correctly) adding color arbitrarily to a B&W image---as old movies are sometimes colorized. I think this is the definition you used when you originally brought the matter up. If so, this is not what NASA does. Strictly speaking, what NASA does is "color enhancement". A few of the websites you quote actually go to the trouble of explaining what they meant by the word "colorize" and (if you will go to the trouble of reading them), you will see that what I say is true. For instance, the very first site you quote has a link to a page that explains how the "colorization" of an image was accomplished. (And the fact that you did not give the direct URL to this page leads me to think that you only listed the results of a search for "NASA" and "colorization" and did not actually bother to read what you found.) That explanation is he http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/sci/earth/index.html Another term often used in this sort of processing is "false color". This is a much more accurate and much less misleading description than "colorization", which implies that color is being added to a B&W images. Here is a nice little website that I often steer students to: http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/mars/teach...displcont.html It goes a long way toward explaining just what "color enhancement" means and how it is done. I hope it will allay some of your doubts about what is being done and for what reasons. RM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Once upon a time (Sun, 07 Sep 2003 17:38:23 -0000)
Flying _Naked_People took a deep breath and said: And I am amazed to see how earth looked from mars. It showed no detail at all and gave no indication of the land here. That makes me wonder if most of the planets we see from earth suffer the same perspective. The MOC camera with which the "Earth from Mars" picture was taken is designed for from-orbit images. In other words, the magnification for distances over tens of millions of km isn't really that good... And yes, Earth looks like a blue dot in the Martian sky, remember that 70% of the planet's surface is covered with water, and much of the rest is covered by clouds. Just as Mars looks like a red dot in the terrestrial sky, though it has lots of color variation. Here's a friendly suggestion: Pick up a pair of binoculars and take a look at Mars (probably around midnight is best to view it, looking roughly southwards). This is the best time to view Mars and _verify for yourself_ that it darned well IS red! Jarmo -------------------------------------------------------------------- Jarmo Korteniemi * Planetology group, Astronomy, University of Oulu, Finland * DLR (The German Aerospace Center), Berlin - Institute of Space Sensor Technology and Planetary Exploration * email: jarmo DOT korteniemi AT oulu DOT fi -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Do you believe in astrology? Jupiter exerts less gravitational influence over a human body than does an angry rhino less than two meters away... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Flying _Naked_People" http://www.rcip.com/nerdgerl/email.htm wrote in message ... Ron Miller wrote in article ... What you are trying to establish, I take it, is that NASA takes B&W images and "fakes" the color in them. This is not the case at all. And before you ask: this is something about which I have considerable experience. I am an author and illustrator specializing in astronomical subjects (my most recent series of books just received the 2003 American Institute of Physics Award of Excellence for Science Writing). As an illustrator, I have worked with NASA imaging and imagery for 30 years and have intimate knowledge of the processes involved. I have handled the raw images as they have come directly from the spacecraft and know precisely what happens to them in the process of enhancement and why this enhancement is done (for one thing, it is important to me when creating an illustration to depict a place as it really looks and not as it appears in an enhanced image). There are a vast number of ways in which the information contained in a photo can be extracted by such manipulation, some of which involve converting portions of a B&W image into color by means of filters, computers, etc. But this is done in order to enhance features for scientific study, not to introduce arbitrary colors. Perhaps the closet that NASA comes to doing what you seem to want to prove is in many of its radar images of the surface of Venus, which are often reproduced in an overall orangish-yellow tint. If Venus is "reproduced" as orangish-yellow, what color is it **Really**? Oh, and don't bother answering if that question is too STUPID for you. After all, I can just dial up NASA and expect an answer. No...I only said that the NASA has made many of its images of Venus (not the original radar images, mind you, but only the computer-recreated "3D" views) orangish in tone. There is no other case where NASA has "colorized" space imagery for arbitrary reasons. If you will re-read what I wrote, you will see that I was using this Venus imagery as the sole example of this. RM |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Flying _Naked_People" http://www.rcip.com/nerdgerl/email.htm wrote in message ... Thank you. I am bookmarking these sites right now. Excellent! The second site is kind of fun. R |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon and Mars expeditions vs. RLV development | vthokie | Policy | 62 | March 30th 04 04:51 AM |
Pres. Kerry's NASA | ed kyle | Policy | 354 | March 11th 04 07:05 PM |
NASA's year of sorrow, recovery, progress and success | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 31st 03 07:28 PM |
NASA Celebrates Educational Benefits of Earth Science Week | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 10th 03 04:14 PM |
NASA Seeks Public Suggestions For Mars Photos | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 20th 03 08:15 PM |