A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Relative motion is backward to real motion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 15th 11, 05:05 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,rec.org.mensa,sci.astro
jon car
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default Relative motion is backward to real motion

Without a real motion there can be no appearence of opposite motion
around you.
Also relative motion shrinks in the distance. The real motions that
create the relatives always experience weightedness when they begin to
move. No such weightedness exists for relative motion.

Mitchell Raemsch
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is 'motion'? G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 0 February 2nd 09 02:41 PM
NOVA's "Magnetic Storm" program; A.P.'s theory that Continental Drift is caused by the relative motion of the mantle versus crust a_plutonium Astronomy Misc 46 November 2nd 06 08:37 AM
Important find:when is the light wave-motion ?and when is particle-motion? xszxsz Science 0 October 28th 04 08:56 AM
Important find:when is the light wave-motion ?and when is particle-motion? xszxsz Research 0 October 27th 04 06:26 AM
Relative Motion G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 0 July 19th 03 02:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.