|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
The Excellence of the Shuttle System
The shuttle is an excellent and reliable system. Two failures of about
100 flights is pretty good reliability.== The hell it is!!! Thats good for a X plane (well almost - the X-15 I know had twice that rate) but for a frieghter its rediculas!! Shuttle was to be a safe relyable low cost system to get poeople and cargo to and from space. Its none of the above, even compared to expendables of the day. Kelly Starks "Humans are a race of compassionate predators." |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
The Excellence of the Shuttle System
BTW, when was the last time you saw either an ejection system
or an escape capsule on _any_ type of cargo aircraft ??? To be fair, I think C-130s have some sort of escape system. :-) not that I ever saw or heard of? Kelly Starks "Humans are a race of compassionate predators." |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
The Excellence of the Shuttle System
The shuttle is an excellent and reliable system. Two failures of about 100 flights is pretty good reliability. There are two problems with the shuttle. Don't you ever consider designing commercial/military aircraft, please! I think airliners are designed to have a crash per few million flights, not every few dozen. After all their are thousands of flights per day, and few crashes per year. And the argument that 'it's a spaceship' doesn't change mine. 1. The lack of plan B in case of failure. During launch there should be an apollo style LET system to remove the cabin from the fireball. So you now need to redesign the cabin to come away by design...how much does this weigh? Are parachutes pratical? And you also must now be able to survive coming down on land or water... At least a few tons I imagin. ===== 2. The utter stupidity of shuttling a heavy vehicle up and down when the cost of launch is so high. It's not the weight of the vehicle that causes that. What does a fully fueled 747 weigh? True. Shuttle costs are largely due to the high labor costs needed to prep the shuttle for launch. These are due to design shortcomings, not weight. The only thing the shuttle is good for is bringing something back from orbit. This is not something we need. We should use the existing shuttles to continue launching payloads while we develop a vehicle like Buran where we could replace the orbiter with some other payload. The idea's not new, we call it Shuttle-C. Some like it, some don't. and it isn't necessairily cheap, either. It could be if It eliminates the bulk of the systems that require the high labor hours per flight. After all we do have a heavy launch vehicle. The shuttle system without the shuttle. Zoltan Kelly Starks "Humans are a race of compassionate predators." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Manifest | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 2 | February 2nd 04 10:55 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Manifest | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |