A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Technology
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Air breathing Engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #32  
Old February 3rd 04, 02:22 AM
Allen Meece
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Air breathing Engines

the _UTTER STUPIDITY_ of using Gross Lift-Off Weight as a figure of merit,
Well, it IS a figure of merit. And it's intelligent to think so and it's ok
to have an opinion. No need to take out your anger issues on this board.
^
//^\\
~~~ near space elevator ~~~~
~~~members.aol.com/beanstalkr/~~~
  #33  
Old February 3rd 04, 04:41 AM
Kelly St
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Air breathing Engines


We would not just be eliminating the weight of the oxygen tank, we
would be eliminating the weight of the oxygen. The mixture ratio being
6:1 we would be eliminating 83% of the weight of the stage.


Please go back and re-read =ALL= of Henry Spencer's many, many postings

on the _UTTER STUPIDITY_ of using Gross Lift-Off Weight as a figure of merit,

and the _UTTER STUPIDITY_ of speading enormous sums of money on hardware

to save a bit of LOX, when LOX is one of the cheapest industrial chemicals
you can find on Earth, until you =FINALLY= understand what he is saying,
and the truth of it exterminates your false ideas and wishful thinking.


Please reread the posts. No one cares about saving the cost of the LOx. They
care about the dev cost and operating cost of the vehicle (virtualy none of
which involves the cost of the fuel or LOx), and BIG TIME care about the
riskyness of the development program. Cutting the weight and bulk of the big
tanks and rocket motors. It lowers thrust needs, increases structural
strength, lowers drag, and simplifies the design, increses operating
flexobility. That kind of thing really interests designers. Especially when
all rocket SSTO are widly considered at best very near the edge of doability.
Air breath your way out of the bulk of the take off weight, and you eliminate a
ton of design problems.

Lox is trivial, buildability however...
Kelly Starks


"Humans are a race of compassionate predators."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multiple Engines??? Charles Talleyrand Technology 125 February 4th 04 06:41 PM
State of the art Ion Engines Charles Talleyrand Technology 5 November 25th 03 10:35 PM
Ultra-Low Oxygen Could Have Triggered Mass Extinctions, Spurred Bird Breathing System Ron Baalke Science 0 October 31st 03 05:34 PM
Air breathing re-entry concept Zoltan Szakaly Technology 15 September 27th 03 07:19 PM
Do NASA's engines destroy the Ozone Layer Jim Norton Space Shuttle 1 September 27th 03 12:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.