|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 1:49:26 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
Thanks. Cut and paste makes it soooo much easier for me to keep posting the same proof, you keep trying to avoid. People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets. ....They made that clear to reporters.. 9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM Refute this, you stupid idiot... https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...untsofthenycai |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
palsing wrote in
: On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 1:49:26 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote: Thanks. Cut and paste makes it soooo much easier for me to keep posting the same proof, you keep trying to avoid. People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets. ....They made that clear to reporters.. 9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM Refute this, you stupid idiot... https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...nessaccountsof thenycai It's obviously a Gubmint con-spear-a-see, dammit. Those damned crisis actors! -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.****nozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "And I have already debunked the idea that I wear underware on any part of my body." - Ed making lingerie stock plummet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
palsing wrote: On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 1:49:26 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote: Thanks. Cut and paste makes it soooo much easier for me to keep posting the same proof, you keep trying to avoid. People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets. ....They made that clear to reporters.. 9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM Refute this, you stupid idiot... https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...untsofthenycai So ? you think a homemade website is a credible source ? You are really going to love some of the flat earth stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies And it's on wikopedia, so it MUST be true, huh ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 7:31:52 AM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
palsing wrote: People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets. ....They made that clear to reporters.. 9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM Refute this, you stupid idiot... https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...untsofthenycai So ? you think a homemade website is a credible source ? You are really going to love some of the flat earth stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies And it's on wikopedia, so it MUST be true, huh ? I'm sorry I hurt your feelings when I called you stupid. I thought you already knew... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
"palsing" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 7:31:52 AM UTC-8, Bast wrote: palsing wrote: People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets. ....They made that clear to reporters.. 9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM Refute this, you stupid idiot... https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...untsofthenycai So ? you think a homemade website is a credible source ? You are really going to love some of the flat earth stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies And it's on wikopedia, so it MUST be true, huh ? I'm sorry I hurt your feelings when I called you stupid. I thought you already knew... And can you get back to the subject or at least try? Fact is what we saw ram the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs in that they never slowed down on impact, they didn't lose any parts on impact and some of them lost wings while in flight just like CGIs that have been programmed to reflect the sky do and did. Rocky |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 12:40:08 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
"palsing" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 7:31:52 AM UTC-8, Bast wrote: palsing wrote: People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets. ....They made that clear to reporters.. 9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM Refute this, you stupid idiot... https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...untsofthenycai So ? you think a homemade website is a credible source ? You are really going to love some of the flat earth stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies And it's on wikopedia, so it MUST be true, huh ? I'm sorry I hurt your feelings when I called you stupid. I thought you already knew... And can you get back to the subject or at least try? Fact is what we saw ram the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs in that they never slowed down on impact, they didn't lose any parts on impact and some of them lost wings while in flight just like CGIs that have been programmed to reflect the sky do and did. There are plenty of photos and videos to prove otherwise. Get a freakin' life. Didn't lose any parts on impact? Really? http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...hullpiece.html http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...cengines2.html http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...ndinggear.html These sure look like valid photos to me, you gullible fool... http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit_photos.html I would call you stupid, too, but everyone already knows that. If you had a brain in your head you would probably take it out and play with it... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
Rocky wrote: "palsing" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 7:31:52 AM UTC-8, Bast wrote: palsing wrote: People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets. ....They made that clear to reporters.. 9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM Refute this, you stupid idiot... https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...untsofthenycai So ? you think a homemade website is a credible source ? You are really going to love some of the flat earth stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies And it's on wikopedia, so it MUST be true, huh ? I'm sorry I hurt your feelings when I called you stupid. I thought you already knew... And can you get back to the subject or at least try? Fact is what we saw ram the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs in that they never slowed down on impact, they didn't lose any parts on impact and some of them lost wings while in flight just like CGIs that have been programmed to reflect the sky do and did. Rocky They never "lost" wings,....the wings simply vaporized and vanished or turned completely invisible before anything was even near any buiildings. I guess we just have to put it down to another of those Bermuda Triangle mysteries. Or Spectre's evil disintegration ray, that will allow them to take over the world unless James Bond saves us. Ian Flemming wrote far more believable fiction, than the 9/11 offical fairytale printing company. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
palsing wrote: On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 12:40:08 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote: "palsing" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 7:31:52 AM UTC-8, Bast wrote: palsing wrote: People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets. ....They made that clear to reporters.. 9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM Refute this, you stupid idiot... https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...untsofthenycai So ? you think a homemade website is a credible source ? You are really going to love some of the flat earth stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies And it's on wikopedia, so it MUST be true, huh ? I'm sorry I hurt your feelings when I called you stupid. I thought you already knew... And can you get back to the subject or at least try? Fact is what we saw ram the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs in that they never slowed down on impact, they didn't lose any parts on impact and some of them lost wings while in flight just like CGIs that have been programmed to reflect the sky do and did. There are plenty of photos and videos to prove otherwise. Get a freakin' life. Didn't lose any parts on impact? Really? http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...hullpiece.html http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...cengines2.html http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...ndinggear.html These sure look like valid photos to me, you gullible fool... http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit_photos.html I would call you stupid, too, but everyone already knows that. If you had a brain in your head you would probably take it out and play with it... Uh,....why are you showing PLANE PARTS,....the the alleged debris from WTC 7 ??? All your links have WTC7 specifically mentioned. Pssst,.....the official 9/11 fairytale say no planes hit WTC 7,....so for kripes sakes be quiet or Bast and Rocky and the rest of the world will be laughing at you. ......OOPS TOO LATE |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 2:55:48 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
palsing wrote: On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 12:40:08 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote: "palsing" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 7:31:52 AM UTC-8, Bast wrote: palsing wrote: People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets. ....They made that clear to reporters.. 9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM Refute this, you stupid idiot... https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...untsofthenycai So ? you think a homemade website is a credible source ? You are really going to love some of the flat earth stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies And it's on wikopedia, so it MUST be true, huh ? I'm sorry I hurt your feelings when I called you stupid. I thought you already knew... And can you get back to the subject or at least try? Fact is what we saw ram the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs in that they never slowed down on impact, they didn't lose any parts on impact and some of them lost wings while in flight just like CGIs that have been programmed to reflect the sky do and did. There are plenty of photos and videos to prove otherwise. Get a freakin' life. Didn't lose any parts on impact? Really? http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...hullpiece.html http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...ndinggear.html These sure look like valid photos to me, you gullible fool... http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit_photos.html I would call you stupid, too, but everyone already knows that. If you had a brain in your head you would probably take it out and play with it... Uh,....why are you showing PLANE PARTS,....the the alleged debris from WTC 7 ??? All your links have WTC7 specifically mentioned. Pssst,.....the official 9/11 fairytale say no planes hit WTC 7,....so for kripes sakes be quiet or Bast and Rocky and the rest of the world will be laughing at you. .....OOPS TOO LATE Although the links all contain "WTC7" that does not guarantee that everything on those pages refer to WTC7 You ignorant moron, did you only look at the pictures and fail to read any of the descriptions? For example... "This photograph of debris on the roof of WTC 4 shows a fragment of the hull of the jetliner that crashed into the South Tower (Flight 175)." "These photographs show remains of an engine that passed through the South Tower, resting at the corner of Church and Murray Streets." "The first photograph shows a portion of Flight 11's landing gear... at the corner of West and Rector Streets, about four blocks south of the North Tower." No one claims a plane hit WTC 7, but it clearly suffered much damage from the fall of WTC 1. The links I provided merely scratch the surface, there are hundreds and hundreds more. Never learned how to search the internet properly? BTW, that video you linked, "9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation" was unbelievably simple-minded and intelligently assembled, I can't imagine anyone with more than 3 or 4 brain cells believing much of anything therein. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:19:28 -0500, "Bast"
wrote: Roger Rocky, Troofer Squirrel wrote: Fact is what we saw ram the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs in that they never slowed down on impact, they didn't lose any parts on impact and some of them lost wings while in flight just like CGIs that have been programmed to reflect the sky do and did. Rocky They never "lost" wings,.... JHC. You two are a complete cluster****. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PROOF!!! TransAsia Airways Flight 235 Crash is a COMPLETE HOAX (VIDEO) | G=EMC^2TreBert | Misc | 2 | February 9th 15 12:55 AM |
TWA Flight 800 Investigators Claim the Official Crash Story Is a Lie | Brad Guth[_3_] | Misc | 2 | July 30th 13 05:01 PM |
TWA Flight 800 Investigators Claim the Official Crash Story Is a Lie | Brad Guth[_3_] | Misc | 0 | June 20th 13 12:13 AM |
First sight. | Pete Lawrence | UK Astronomy | 4 | September 17th 03 01:42 PM |
Hubble, the End Is in Sight!!! | Orion | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 7th 03 06:07 PM |