twin paradox experiment done in lab

On Jul 18, 12:06 pm, PD wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:

Allow Him to comment on this time dilation stuff more thoroughly.
Time dilation is predicted by all the infinite numbers of transforms
that satisfy the null results of the MMX. These transforms include,
of course, the Lorentz, the Voigt, and Larmor’s original transform.
All these transforms except the Lorentz predict time dilation relative
to the absolute frame of reference. shrug

Thus, observing a time dilation does not validate SR. Is that not in
accordance with scientific inquiry? Guess not for PD. shrug

If the
committee is any competent, the policy will be a good one. If not, oh
well. To a committee who worship a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar
as a god, the policy is going to be soundly a bad one. Stay tuned for
the following discussions.shrug

If you're going to express paranoid delusions,

What paranoid delusions?

then it would be better
(would it not?) to refer to it as The Committee. Better yet if you
include the words Grand or Secret.

On the contrary, you are the one who is getting very jumpy and full of
conspiracy theories. You assume there is this Committee (with a
capital). Wherever you have spent time in the past few days did not
help your own sanity. It was not a vacation, was it? More party
slogan from the committee (with a little c), eh? shrug

You should not go off on a tangent to the discussion. We are
discussing the time dilation where self-styled physicists have
mindlessly proclaimed the validity of SR because of observed time
dilation.

No, relativity is proclaimed to be the most successful of competing
theories because of the COLLECTION of experimental evidence of different
predictions,

This so-called relativity cannot even sort out its own self-
consistencies. It is full of inconsistencies. shrug

of which there are dozens, instantiated in literally
hundreds of independent tests.

This is total bull****. Giving you an example, let’s say there exists
a hypothesis that flying pigs do exist. After all, experiments after
experiments have shown flying creatures do exist such as insects,
birds, and the only powered-flying mammal (bats). It is just asinine
and stupid to conclude that the hypothesis that flying pigs do also
exist. Extend that to relativity. This is what all these
experimental verifications to relativity represent --- asinine and
stupid. shrug

In reality, there are an infinite numbers of other
transforms, besides the Lorentz transform, that satisfy the null
results of the MMX also manifest time dilation.

Well, not an infinitude but a large number, yes.

If not infinite, well then, how many? shrug

It is completely
stupid to validate one hypothesis and junk the rest based on an
observation that is predicted by all.

But it isn't validated on the basis of this one observation. I don't
know where you ever got the idea it is.

There is no validation to the unique property of the Lorentz transform
that stands out among all the infinite others that is the simple time
dilation that satisfied the principle of relativity. shrug

That is like you are able to single out an animal based on it walking
on four legs. It is just not accordance with any scientific
methodology. If you are saying the self-styled physicists do this
type of voodoo science, that would explain why SR and GR are
worshipped as vehicles of a religion with Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar as its messiah. shrug

You have shown no such experiment that shows the mutual time
dilation.shrug

Moreover, as has been pointed out repeatedly, mutual time dilation HAS
been confirmed in experimental test.

Where is such an experiment? More lies from PD. shrug

Among all the infinite transforms that satisfy the null results of the
MMX, they all manifest time dilation relative to the absolute frame of
reference. The Lorentz transform, which is based on voodoo
mathematics and thus does not represent anything realistic, is the
only one that predicts the mutual time dilation (that satisfies the
principle of relativity) through the total fouled concept of relative
simultaneity. shrug

After spending a few days reviewing/studying relativity, you still
have failed to understand that. It is becoming obvious that you do
not possess any amplitude to understand the subject involved. Thus,
there is just no point to go on with the discussion when you cannot
even understand this rudimentary point about relativity. shrug

Peter Webb, the cowardly troll, wrote:
Peter Webb’s God, Koobee Wublee wrote:

This is total bull****. Giving you an example, let’s say there exists
a hypothesis that flying pigs do exist. After all, experiments after
experiments have shown flying creatures do exist such as insects,
birds, and the only powered-flying mammal (bats). It is just asinine
and stupid to conclude that the hypothesis that flying pigs do also
exist. Extend that to relativity. This is what all these
experimental verifications to relativity represent --- asinine and
stupid. shrug

First of all, you cannot even do the common courtesy of sorting out
who said what and who replied what. There is just no point to
communicate with an idiot like yourself. shrug

Explain how Hafele and Keating...

This issue has been addressed way too many times over by your God,
Koobee Wublee. If you continue to choose to ignore that, it is
totally your problem. shrug

You are simply a troll...

Nonsense. You are the one who chooses to continue to consume all the
dropping of your God, Koobee Wublee. shrug

Just for the record...

Yeah, for the record, Koobee Wublee remains your God. Care to present
sacrifices? Cutting your right wrist would be gladly accepted as a
sacrifice. shrug

the poor guy seems to be bound-up
in the quadratic equations of so-called space-time,
which is nothing but a phase-space a la quaternions.

anyway, always folks believe that UFOs are aerodynamic,
whereas pigs actually do Float.

Are there any experimental predictions of relativity which

floating objects, or most commonly the Morning Star or
the Evening Star ... according to Blue Book et Al. of course,
pilots get see that far more often than passengers, or
skateboarders.

please note that quaternions are "the original vectors" terminology.

anyway, always folks believe that UFOs are aerodynamic,