Chapt37 pi and "e" and "i" explained #423 Atom Totality 4th ed

Chapter 37
Subject: let me include the number "i" chapter 37 Atom Totality theory


In the first three editions of this book I have talked about "pi and
e" but let me begin to
use the number "i" also in the Atom Totality theory. That in the Big
Bang theory, it is
deaf dumb and silent about any explanation of the numbers of
mathematics. But in
the Atom Totality theory, why numbers have the value they do
possess,
must be
explained by the true theory of the universe. Why does pi have the
value 3.14....
and "e" the value of 2.71..... and "i" the value of sqrt(-1). Well
the
Atom Totality says
the values are because the last electron in plutonium is 22
subshells
inside of 7 shells
for which 19 are occupied in rational number form. The value of "i"
is
because an
electron must be a negative-one and that the difference between
Elliptic geometry
versus Euclidean geometry is a factor of the square-root of (-1) or
a
factor of the
squaring of (-1) to end up with (-1).


You see, there are two NonEuclidean geometries of Elliptic and
Hyperbolic and to
move between NonEuclidean to Euclidean and back and forth is a
factor
of either
square-root of (-1) or the squaring of (-1) to end up with (-1).


In math, the rule of thumb of what "i" is physically is a 90 degree
rotation. In physics
of the Atom Totality, "i" is a translation of numbers in
NonEuclidean
Geometry as if
those numbers were in Euclidean Geometry.


For example look at this curve on a sphere surface

"("

for it is in Elliptic Geometry
and look at this curve on a hyperbola

")"

and if I put the two
together as this:


)(

they cancel giving a straight line of Euclidean. So the "i" number
in mathematics
and physics is the reality that 90 + 90 degrees is 180 degrees is
that
Elliptic with Hyperbolic translates into Euclidean.


--- from 2nd edition ---
One
topic that was raised recently
is the question of when the electron was assigned the value of (-1).
I
believe the history of physics of the electron assigned -1 charge
goes back to Ben Franklin as to positive and negative charges but
the
electron was not
fully developed until about the late 1800s and early 1900s.


So the question is: was it arbitrary to assign the electron as (-1)
or
was it a lucky guess
for which the laws of physics can only have the electron as (-1)?


In the 1990s I vaguely remember my mind traversing this question but
I
could not remember
what my answer was back then. I have a "intuitive feeling" that some
feature of physics demanded
that the electron be assigned the (-1) value in order for satisfying
some physics equations.


Was it the negative sign in the Maxwell Equation Theory of Faraday's
Law? If the electron
had been assigned a (+1) value, would the Maxwell Equations not come
out properly?


I have forgotten what my answer to this assigning of electron as (-1)
was in the history of
physics, but I am going to venture into proving that the electron
has
to be assigned (-1)
due to the Atom Totality theory.


Notice that the number (i) appears alot in physics and is the
sqrt(-1). Notice that mathematics
is incomplete unless it has a sqrt(-1).


Now imagine if physics history had assigned the electron as (+1)
instead of (-1). And then humanity
discovers the Atom Totality theory. And then humanity realizes that
the Euler Identity
of e^(pi)(i) = -1 is the math description of the Observable Cosmos
where the (-1) is the fact that
we are living in the last electron of the 5f6. And the (i) within
that
Identity is the fact of orthogonal
energy term of the electron space universe.


What I am trying to say quickly is that the Atom Totality Theory
proves that the assigning
of the electron as (-1) was never an arbitrary exercise. That the
electron had to have the
value of (-1) and could never take the value of (+1).


But I do suspect that other parts of physics already found out that
the electron charge value
had to be (-1) such as the Maxwell Equations. If not, well, then
this
post is a historic post
because it shows us that the charge value of the electron has to be
(-1).

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

On May 14, 10:59*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
Chapter 37
Subject: let me include the number "i" chapter 37 Atom Totality theory

*Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

When we say: "whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of
the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies" are we saying that the particular
atom that is the Universe is Plutonium? In specific 231 Plutonium?

On May 15, 7:00*am, Ian wrote:
On May 14, 10:59*pm, Archimedes Plutonium

wrote:
Chapter 37
Subject: let me include the number "i" chapter 37 Atom Totality theory
*Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

When we say: "whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of
the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies" are we saying that the particular
atom that is the Universe is Plutonium? In specific 231 Plutonium?

"An tha "atom" shore wud have a bunch of electrons there, Buford.
Why, whut wud it be, lak element number 100,000,000,000??? But it sore
do look gud thar, awl printed out an all in that footer."

On May 15, 7:46*am, Don Stockbauer wrote:
On May 15, 7:00*am, Ian wrote:

On May 14, 10:59*pm, Archimedes Plutonium

wrote:
Chapter 37
Subject: let me include the number "i" chapter 37 Atom Totality theory
*Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

When we say: "whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of
the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies" are we saying that the particular
atom that is the Universe is Plutonium? In specific 231 Plutonium?

"An tha "atom" shore wud *have a bunch of electrons there, Buford.
Why, whut wud it be, lak element number 100,000,000,000??? But it sore
do look gud thar, awl printed out an all in that footer."

Good point.

On May 15, 7:46*am, Don Stockbauer wrote:
On May 15, 7:00*am, Ian wrote:

On May 14, 10:59*pm, Archimedes Plutonium

wrote:
Chapter 37
Subject: let me include the number "i" chapter 37 Atom Totality theory
*Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

When we say: "whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of
the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies" are we saying that the particular
atom that is the Universe is Plutonium? In specific 231 Plutonium?

"An tha "atom" shore wud *have a bunch of electrons there, Buford.
Why, whut wud it be, lak element number 100,000,000,000??? But it sore
do look gud thar, awl printed out an all in that footer."

Good point.

On May 15, 7:00*am, Ian wrote:
On May 14, 10:59*pm, Archimedes Plutonium

wrote:
Chapter 37
Subject: let me include the number "i" chapter 37 Atom Totality theory
*Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

When we say: "whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of
the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies" are we saying that the particular
atom that is the Universe is Plutonium? In specific 231 Plutonium?

Yes, the 231Pu is the isotope that fits all the special numbers of
physics and math such as
fine structure constant, proton to electron mass ratio, 2.71 blackbody
microwave
background radiation, pi, e.

If you were told that the Cosmos is a big atom where the galaxies are
pieces of the
last electrons of this big atom, then the isotope that fits it all the
best is 231Pu.

On May 15, 11:17*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
On May 15, 7:00*am, Ian wrote:

On May 14, 10:59*pm, Archimedes Plutonium

wrote:
Chapter 37
Subject: let me include the number "i" chapter 37 Atom Totality theory
*Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

When we say: "whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of
the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies" are we saying that the particular
atom that is the Universe is Plutonium? In specific 231 Plutonium?

Yes, the 231Pu is the isotope that fits all the special numbers of
physics and math such as
fine structure constant, proton to electron mass ratio, 2.71 blackbody
microwave
background radiation, pi, e.

If you were told that the Cosmos is a big atom where the galaxies are
pieces of the
last electrons of this big atom, then the isotope that fits it all the
best is 231Pu.

Very interesting. That was what I wanted to know. It seemed to me that
was the idea, but I could not get it from chapter 37 alone, as that
chapter deals only with pi and e. So in other words, 231 plutonium is
at the heart of the structure of the universe.

On May 15, 1:55*pm, Ian wrote:
On May 15, 11:17*am, Archimedes Plutonium



wrote:
On May 15, 7:00*am, Ian wrote:

On May 14, 10:59*pm, Archimedes Plutonium

wrote:
Chapter 37
Subject: let me include the number "i" chapter 37 Atom Totality theory
*Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

When we say: "whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of
the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies" are we saying that the particular
atom that is the Universe is Plutonium? In specific 231 Plutonium?

Yes, the 231Pu is the isotope that fits all the special numbers of
physics and math such as
fine structure constant, proton to electron mass ratio, 2.71 blackbody
microwave
background radiation, pi, e.

If you were told that the Cosmos is a big atom where the galaxies are
pieces of the
last electrons of this big atom, then the isotope that fits it all the
best is 231Pu.

Very interesting. That was what I wanted to know. It seemed to me that
was the idea, but I could not get it from chapter 37 alone, as that
chapter deals only with pi and e. So in other words, 231 plutonium is
at the heart of the structure of the universe.

If the Universe is one big atom, the isotope that fits the numbers of
physics
and math the very best is 231 Pu.

The single most strongest evidence of a Atom Totality is the blackbody
Cosmic
Microwave Background radiation with its 2.71 degrees K. Using
DeBroglie book
of thermodynamics of an isolated atom 231Pu delivers that number 2.71
Kelvin
the best of the isotopes.