|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effected bymagnetism?
Hi. There is one thing that I have always been confused about visible
light as an electromagnetic force. I understand light to be an electromagnetic wave propagating through space with the the magnetic and electro forces alternately collapsing and expanding. This alternate fluctuations in the magnetica and electro force are seen as the frequency of a light's wave. What I don't get is why visible light is not then bent by magnetic fields? What I am missing here? - Canopus56 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effectedby magnetism?
canopus56 wrote:
Hi. There is one thing that I have always been confused about visible light as an electromagnetic force. I understand light to be an electromagnetic wave propagating through space with the the magnetic and electro forces alternately collapsing and expanding. This alternate fluctuations in the magnetica and electro force are seen as the frequency of a light's wave. What I don't get is why visible light is not then bent by magnetic fields? What I am missing here? - Canopus56 In fact non of the EM waves, from lowest radio via light to the highest gamma rays, are bent by a magnetic field. If you want to bent them, use a lens, reflector or gravity. A black hole is very useful for bending all sorts of rays. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effected bymagnetism?
On Nov 28, 5:31 pm, Sjouke Burry
wrote: canopus56 wrote: Hi. There is one thing that I have always been confused about visible light as an electromagnetic force. I understand light to be an electromagnetic wave propagating through space with the the magnetic and electro forces alternately collapsing and expanding. This alternate fluctuations in the magnetica and electro force are seen as the frequency of a light's wave. What I don't get is why visible light is not then bent by magnetic fields? What I am missing here? - Canopus56 In fact non of the EM waves, from lowest radio via light to the highest gamma rays, are bent by a magnetic field. If you want to bent them, use a lens, reflector or gravity. A black hole is very useful for bending all sorts of rays. Which begs the question: why are photons bandied-about as if they were discrete particles (and radio waves are not so treated), having zero rest mass (as if it's even possible for light to be standing still), etc. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effected by magnetism?
"Sjouke Burry" wrote in message ... canopus56 wrote: Hi. There is one thing that I have always been confused about visible light as an electromagnetic force. I understand light to be an electromagnetic wave propagating through space with the the magnetic and electro forces alternately collapsing and expanding. This alternate fluctuations in the magnetica and electro force are seen as the frequency of a light's wave. What I don't get is why visible light is not then bent by magnetic fields? What I am missing here? - Canopus56 In fact non of the EM waves, from lowest radio via light to the highest gamma rays, are bent by a magnetic field. If you want to bent them, use a lens, reflector or gravity. A black hole is very useful for bending all sorts of rays. Tough to carry around in your pocket, though. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effectedby magnetism?
John Nichols wrote:
"Sjouke Burry" wrote in message ... canopus56 wrote: Hi. There is one thing that I have always been confused about visible light as an electromagnetic force. I understand light to be an electromagnetic wave propagating through space with the the magnetic and electro forces alternately collapsing and expanding. This alternate fluctuations in the magnetica and electro force are seen as the frequency of a light's wave. What I don't get is why visible light is not then bent by magnetic fields? What I am missing here? - Canopus56 In fact non of the EM waves, from lowest radio via light to the highest gamma rays, are bent by a magnetic field. If you want to bent them, use a lens, reflector or gravity. A black hole is very useful for bending all sorts of rays. Tough to carry around in your pocket, though. "Is that an apo black hole in your, scope or just an achro? :-) Shawn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effected by magnetism?
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:43:45 -0800 (PST), "
wrote: Which begs the question: why are photons bandied-about as if they were discrete particles (and radio waves are not so treated), having zero rest mass (as if it's even possible for light to be standing still), etc. Because it is often convenient. We have detectors that can record single photons with energies in the optical range. We can't generally detect single photons with radio energies. That doesn't mean that radio waves/particles don't exhibit the same kind of duality, though. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effectedby magnetism?
Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:43:45 -0800 (PST), " wrote: Which begs the question: why are photons bandied-about as if they were discrete particles (and radio waves are not so treated), having zero rest mass (as if it's even possible for light to be standing still), etc. Because it is often convenient. We have detectors that can record single photons with energies in the optical range. We can't generally detect single photons with radio energies. That doesn't mean that radio waves/particles don't exhibit the same kind of duality, though. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com the other thing is magnetic fields polorize the light. we have information about the magnetic field of the galaxy because of this characteristic. none of this is simple josephus -- I go sailing in the Summer and look at STARS in the Winter. "Everybody is igernant, jist on differt subjects" Will Rogers Jr. "it aint what you know that gets you in trouble it is what you know that aint so" Josh Billings. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effected bymagnetism?
On Nov 28, 6:19 pm, canopus56 wrote:
What I don't get is why visible light is not then bent by magnetic fields? What I am missing here? Why aren't radio waves affected by magnetic fields? Magnetic fields pull on chunks of iron because what happens in that case is that two generators of magnetism pull on each other. But the magnetic field of a radio wave just adds to the magnetic field of a magnet to produce the resulting field at a place where both are present. Light is another form of electromagnetic radiation. So, if you shine a flashlight on a magnet, you don't expect the light to bend. You expect the flashlight to start vibrating. And maybe it does, very quickly and very weakly. John Savard |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effected by magnetism?
Quadibloc:
So, if you shine a flashlight on a magnet... If I shine a flashlight on a magnet I expect the light to stick to the magnet. Davoud -- usenet *at* davidillig *dawt* com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Basic physics Q on light - why is visible light not effected by magnetism?
josephus wrote in
: Chris L Peterson wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:43:45 -0800 (PST), " wrote: Which begs the question: why are photons bandied-about as if they were discrete particles (and radio waves are not so treated), having zero rest mass (as if it's even possible for light to be standing still), etc. Because it is often convenient. We have detectors that can record single photons with energies in the optical range. We can't generally detect single photons with radio energies. That doesn't mean that radio waves/particles don't exhibit the same kind of duality, though. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com the other thing is magnetic fields polorize the light. we have information about the magnetic field of the galaxy because of this characteristic. none of this is simple But that is an effect on the matter emitting the light, not on the light itself. josephus |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Really unbelievable News: An Antenna for Visible Light!!! | SETI ITALIA Bruno IK2WQA | SETI | 5 | April 17th 12 12:29 PM |
Light Sabre Physics | [email protected] | Policy | 11 | April 7th 07 02:00 PM |
Visible stars from the UK (with no light pollution) | [email protected] | UK Astronomy | 0 | February 1st 07 06:18 PM |
An Antenna for Visible Light | Klaatu | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | September 22nd 04 07:32 AM |
Generate light pollution to celebrate physics mad plan | Das | UK Astronomy | 18 | August 10th 04 08:24 PM |