|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:38:52 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0600, "Rocky" wrote: "Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message ... On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 08:17:16 -0600, "Rocky" wrote: Ok, I've seen all sorts of different stories about why no parts of a 757 were seen shortly after one was supposed to have his the Pentagon. Roger, there were parts of a 757 on the lawn of the Pentagon. But no wing parts and no parts at all "shortly after" Yes there were. There was debris on the highway as well. Huh? Are you now claiming the "plane" was falling apart as is left it's original airport,....and left a trail of debris all the way ? Sort of like Hansel and Grettle left a trail of bread crumbs so they could find their way home. ....You are getting your fairytales mixed up.. No one has made such a claim. Do you honestly think your deception is going to benefit you? You better read back, as the claim was "There was debris on the highway as well." QUOTE,UNQUOTE. So,.... this" plane" was already falling apart and leaving pieces in its wake, well before it even supposedly hit the pentagon. Makes you wonder how a plane losing pieces could still hit a target with accuracy. ...Or even get there to begin with. I guess that's just another one of them 9/11 fairytale mysteries we just have to accept, with blind faith. Bast, you dimwit, just because there was debris on the highway does NOT mean that it fell off the plane before impact... sheesh, what a moroon! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it
palsing wrote: On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote: K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:38:52 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0600, "Rocky" wrote: "Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message ... On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 08:17:16 -0600, "Rocky" wrote: Ok, I've seen all sorts of different stories about why no parts of a 757 were seen shortly after one was supposed to have his the Pentagon. Roger, there were parts of a 757 on the lawn of the Pentagon. But no wing parts and no parts at all "shortly after" Yes there were. There was debris on the highway as well. Huh? Are you now claiming the "plane" was falling apart as is left it's original airport,....and left a trail of debris all the way ? Sort of like Hansel and Grettle left a trail of bread crumbs so they could find their way home. ....You are getting your fairytales mixed up.. No one has made such a claim. Do you honestly think your deception is going to benefit you? You better read back, as the claim was "There was debris on the highway as well." QUOTE,UNQUOTE. So,.... this" plane" was already falling apart and leaving pieces in its wake, well before it even supposedly hit the pentagon. Makes you wonder how a plane losing pieces could still hit a target with accuracy. ...Or even get there to begin with. I guess that's just another one of them 9/11 fairytale mysteries we just have to accept, with blind faith. Bast, you dimwit, just because there was debris on the highway does NOT mean that it fell off the plane before impact... sheesh, what a moroon! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo And yet not one picture of this plane debris on a highway ? Or even an explanation of why debris should have been there in the first place ?....How did this plane keep flying if it was already falling apart long before it got near the pentagon ? It's another Christmas miracle, huh ? B'dee,b'dee, b'dee,.....That's all folks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH7qq7OjJO8 9/11 was an inside job |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it
"palsing" wrote in message ... On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote: K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:38:52 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0600, "Rocky" wrote: "Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message ... On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 08:17:16 -0600, "Rocky" wrote: Ok, I've seen all sorts of different stories about why no parts of a 757 were seen shortly after one was supposed to have his the Pentagon. Roger, there were parts of a 757 on the lawn of the Pentagon. But no wing parts and no parts at all "shortly after" Yes there were. There was debris on the highway as well. Huh? Are you now claiming the "plane" was falling apart as is left it's original airport,....and left a trail of debris all the way ? Sort of like Hansel and Grettle left a trail of bread crumbs so they could find their way home. ....You are getting your fairytales mixed up.. No one has made such a claim. Do you honestly think your deception is going to benefit you? You better read back, as the claim was "There was debris on the highway as well." QUOTE,UNQUOTE. So,.... this" plane" was already falling apart and leaving pieces in its wake, well before it even supposedly hit the pentagon. Makes you wonder how a plane losing pieces could still hit a target with accuracy. ...Or even get there to begin with. I guess that's just another one of them 9/11 fairytale mysteries we just have to accept, with blind faith. Bast, you dimwit, just because there was debris on the highway does NOT mean that it fell off the plane before impact... sheesh, what a moroon! What impact? Oh sorry, I didn't know you were blind. But to those that can see there was no signs of an impact until the second or third scene when they brought out the props they were hiding somewhere. And don't forget 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGHg1bQk9-o Rocky |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it
Rocky wrote: "palsing" wrote in message ... On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote: K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:38:52 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0600, "Rocky" wrote: "Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message ... On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 08:17:16 -0600, "Rocky" wrote: Ok, I've seen all sorts of different stories about why no parts of a 757 were seen shortly after one was supposed to have his the Pentagon. Roger, there were parts of a 757 on the lawn of the Pentagon. But no wing parts and no parts at all "shortly after" Yes there were. There was debris on the highway as well. Huh? Are you now claiming the "plane" was falling apart as is left it's original airport,....and left a trail of debris all the way ? Sort of like Hansel and Grettle left a trail of bread crumbs so they could find their way home. ....You are getting your fairytales mixed up.. No one has made such a claim. Do you honestly think your deception is going to benefit you? You better read back, as the claim was "There was debris on the highway as well." QUOTE,UNQUOTE. So,.... this" plane" was already falling apart and leaving pieces in its wake, well before it even supposedly hit the pentagon. Makes you wonder how a plane losing pieces could still hit a target with accuracy. ...Or even get there to begin with. I guess that's just another one of them 9/11 fairytale mysteries we just have to accept, with blind faith. Bast, you dimwit, just because there was debris on the highway does NOT mean that it fell off the plane before impact... sheesh, what a moroon! What impact? Oh sorry, I didn't know you were blind. But to those that can see there was no signs of an impact until the second or third scene when they brought out the props they were hiding somewhere. Of course it's very interesting that the "debris" they found. was all in pieces small enough that it could be picked up by one person. .....or flown in, in a helicopter and pushed out the door. And no bodies, or luggage scattered anywhere. All other REAL plane crashes always have pieces so large that they need cranes to move them. And don't forget 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGHg1bQk9-o Rocky 9/11,..... brought to you by the same "3 letter" folks who gave you Osama Bin Laden and up to the Paris shootings. ......SO FAR..... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it
On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 1:13:16 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
And yet you failed to address why the jets we saw fly into the Twin Towers are consistent with CGIs with their no slowdown on impact, no crash dynamics on impact and disappearing wings in flight. ROTFLMAO maybe it is all that sinaloa Cocaine your gay fag daddy injects up your asshole? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly? | Brad Guth[_3_] | Misc | 18 | November 28th 13 02:58 AM |
Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat | Rand Simberg[_1_] | Policy | 144 | March 1st 08 05:21 AM |
MODERATOR BEING SUCKED INTO BLACK HOLE-- Please Pray for David Iain Greig of talk.origins | Ed Conrad | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 31st 07 04:09 AM |
Moderator of talk.origins Being Sucked into BLACK HOLE -- Please Pray for David Iain Greig | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 07 04:05 AM |
Space and the Pentagon | Earl Colby Pottinger | Policy | 0 | July 13th 03 02:08 AM |