A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 3rd 16, 02:53 AM posted to alt.astronomy
palsing[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,068
Default The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it

On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:38:52 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0600, "Rocky" wrote:

"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 08:17:16 -0600, "Rocky" wrote:

Ok, I've seen all sorts of different stories about why no parts of
a 757 were seen shortly after one was supposed to have his the
Pentagon.

Roger, there were parts of a 757 on the lawn of the Pentagon.

But no wing parts and no parts at all "shortly after"

Yes there were. There was debris on the highway as well.



Huh?
Are you now claiming the "plane" was falling apart as is left it's
original airport,....and left a trail of debris all the way ?

Sort of like Hansel and Grettle left a trail of bread crumbs so they
could find their way home.
....You are getting your fairytales mixed up..


No one has made such a claim.
Do you honestly think your deception is going to benefit you?






You better read back, as the claim was "There was debris on the highway as
well."
QUOTE,UNQUOTE.

So,.... this" plane" was already falling apart and leaving pieces in its
wake, well before it even supposedly hit the pentagon.

Makes you wonder how a plane losing pieces could still hit a target with
accuracy.
...Or even get there to begin with.

I guess that's just another one of them 9/11 fairytale mysteries we just
have to accept, with blind faith.


Bast, you dimwit, just because there was debris on the highway does NOT mean that it fell off the plane before impact... sheesh, what a moroon!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo
  #2  
Old January 3rd 16, 06:11 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it



palsing wrote:
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:38:52 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0600, "Rocky" wrote:

"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 08:17:16 -0600, "Rocky"
wrote:

Ok, I've seen all sorts of different stories about why no parts
of a 757 were seen shortly after one was supposed to have his the
Pentagon.

Roger, there were parts of a 757 on the lawn of the Pentagon.

But no wing parts and no parts at all "shortly after"

Yes there were. There was debris on the highway as well.



Huh?
Are you now claiming the "plane" was falling apart as is left it's
original airport,....and left a trail of debris all the way ?

Sort of like Hansel and Grettle left a trail of bread crumbs so they
could find their way home.
....You are getting your fairytales mixed up..


No one has made such a claim.
Do you honestly think your deception is going to benefit you?






You better read back, as the claim was "There was debris on the
highway as well."
QUOTE,UNQUOTE.

So,.... this" plane" was already falling apart and leaving pieces in
its wake, well before it even supposedly hit the pentagon.

Makes you wonder how a plane losing pieces could still hit a target
with accuracy.
...Or even get there to begin with.

I guess that's just another one of them 9/11 fairytale mysteries we
just have to accept, with blind faith.


Bast, you dimwit, just because there was debris on the highway does NOT
mean that it fell off the plane before impact... sheesh, what a moroon!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo





And yet not one picture of this plane debris on a highway ?
Or even an explanation of why debris should have been there in the first
place ?....How did this plane keep flying if it was already falling apart
long before it got near the pentagon ?
It's another Christmas miracle, huh ?


B'dee,b'dee, b'dee,.....That's all folks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH7qq7OjJO8

9/11 was an inside job


  #3  
Old January 3rd 16, 06:56 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Rocky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it


"palsing" wrote in message
...
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:38:52 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0600, "Rocky" wrote:

"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 08:17:16 -0600, "Rocky" wrote:

Ok, I've seen all sorts of different stories about why no parts of
a 757 were seen shortly after one was supposed to have his the
Pentagon.

Roger, there were parts of a 757 on the lawn of the Pentagon.

But no wing parts and no parts at all "shortly after"

Yes there were. There was debris on the highway as well.



Huh?
Are you now claiming the "plane" was falling apart as is left it's
original airport,....and left a trail of debris all the way ?

Sort of like Hansel and Grettle left a trail of bread crumbs so they
could find their way home.
....You are getting your fairytales mixed up..


No one has made such a claim.
Do you honestly think your deception is going to benefit you?






You better read back, as the claim was "There was debris on the highway
as
well."
QUOTE,UNQUOTE.

So,.... this" plane" was already falling apart and leaving pieces in its
wake, well before it even supposedly hit the pentagon.

Makes you wonder how a plane losing pieces could still hit a target with
accuracy.
...Or even get there to begin with.

I guess that's just another one of them 9/11 fairytale mysteries we just
have to accept, with blind faith.


Bast, you dimwit, just because there was debris on the highway does NOT
mean that it fell off the plane before impact... sheesh, what a moroon!


What impact? Oh sorry, I didn't know you were blind.

But to those that can see there was no signs of an impact until the second
or third scene when they brought out the props they were hiding somewhere.

And don't forget

3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job -
New Irrefutable Evidence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGHg1bQk9-o

Rocky




  #4  
Old January 3rd 16, 08:49 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it



Rocky wrote:
"palsing" wrote in message
...
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:38:52 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0600, "Rocky" wrote:

"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 08:17:16 -0600, "Rocky"
wrote:
Ok, I've seen all sorts of different stories about why no parts
of a 757 were seen shortly after one was supposed to have his
the Pentagon.

Roger, there were parts of a 757 on the lawn of the Pentagon.

But no wing parts and no parts at all "shortly after"

Yes there were. There was debris on the highway as well.



Huh?
Are you now claiming the "plane" was falling apart as is left it's
original airport,....and left a trail of debris all the way ?

Sort of like Hansel and Grettle left a trail of bread crumbs so they
could find their way home.
....You are getting your fairytales mixed up..


No one has made such a claim.
Do you honestly think your deception is going to benefit you?





You better read back, as the claim was "There was debris on the
highway as
well."
QUOTE,UNQUOTE.

So,.... this" plane" was already falling apart and leaving pieces in
its wake, well before it even supposedly hit the pentagon.

Makes you wonder how a plane losing pieces could still hit a target
with accuracy.
...Or even get there to begin with.

I guess that's just another one of them 9/11 fairytale mysteries we
just have to accept, with blind faith.


Bast, you dimwit, just because there was debris on the highway does NOT
mean that it fell off the plane before impact... sheesh, what a moroon!


What impact? Oh sorry, I didn't know you were blind.

But to those that can see there was no signs of an impact until the
second or third scene when they brought out the props they were hiding
somewhere.






Of course it's very interesting that the "debris" they found. was all in
pieces small enough that it could be picked up by one person.
.....or flown in, in a helicopter and pushed out the door.
And no bodies, or luggage scattered anywhere.

All other REAL plane crashes always have pieces so large that they need
cranes to move them.






And don't forget

3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job -
New Irrefutable Evidence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGHg1bQk9-o

Rocky




9/11,..... brought to you by the same "3 letter" folks who gave you Osama
Bin Laden and up to the Paris shootings.
......SO FAR.....


  #5  
Old January 6th 16, 10:52 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Arc Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,480
Default The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it

On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 1:13:16 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:


And yet you failed to address why the jets we saw fly into the Twin Towers
are consistent with CGIs with their no slowdown on impact, no crash dynamics
on impact and disappearing wings in flight. ROTFLMAO

maybe it is all that sinaloa Cocaine your gay fag daddy injects up your asshole?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly? Brad Guth[_3_] Misc 18 November 28th 13 02:58 AM
Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat Rand Simberg[_1_] Policy 144 March 1st 08 05:21 AM
MODERATOR BEING SUCKED INTO BLACK HOLE-- Please Pray for David Iain Greig of talk.origins Ed Conrad Amateur Astronomy 0 August 31st 07 04:09 AM
Moderator of talk.origins Being Sucked into BLACK HOLE -- Please Pray for David Iain Greig Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 0 August 31st 07 04:05 AM
Space and the Pentagon Earl Colby Pottinger Policy 0 July 13th 03 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.