|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Universe - What We Know
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
It is plain that all the galaxies are moving away from a central point. It has been measured. Kindly point me to the evidence that supports this claim which measures the distance to the center of the universe. Thanks! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Universe - What We Know
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 4:18:09 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: It is plain that all the galaxies are moving away from a central point. It has been measured. Kindly point me to the evidence that supports this claim which measures the distance to the center of the universe. It would not work. What is evidence for me is not evidence for you. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Universe - What We Know
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:25:00 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 4:18:09 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote: On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: It is plain that all the galaxies are moving away from a central point. It has been measured. Kindly point me to the evidence that supports this claim which measures the distance to the center of the universe. It would not work. What is evidence for me is not evidence for you. Then how can you make such an unsupported claim? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Universe - What We Know
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 4:33:23 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:25:00 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 4:18:09 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote: On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: It is plain that all the galaxies are moving away from a central point. It has been measured. Kindly point me to the evidence that supports this claim which measures the distance to the center of the universe. It would not work. What is evidence for me is not evidence for you. Then how can you make such an unsupported claim? The fact that the galaxies are all moving away from a central location is common knowledge. If you want your kind of evidence go get a book about the Big Bang from your local library. You will see that though the Big Bang is called a theory it is generally assumed to be true by the scientific community at large. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Universe - What We Know
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:45:01 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 4:33:23 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote: On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:25:00 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 4:18:09 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote: On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote: It is plain that all the galaxies are moving away from a central point. It has been measured. Kindly point me to the evidence that supports this claim which measures the distance to the center of the universe. It would not work. What is evidence for me is not evidence for you. Then how can you make such an unsupported claim? The fact that the galaxies are all moving away from a central location is common knowledge. No. It is common knowledge that the galaxies that we can observe in our part of the observable universe are all moving away from each other... we really can't say for sure that this is happening in the parts of the universe that we *can't* observe, we can only speculate that the same thing is happening everywhere else. We can't say that they are moving away from any kind of 'center', only that they are moving away from each other! If you want your kind of evidence go get a book about the Big Bang from your local library. You will see that though the Big Bang is called a theory it is generally assumed to be true by the scientific community at large. Well, Mark, I don't need to go to the library because I have an extensive library at home that covers all of this, essentially comprised of my college textbooks. Virtually *all* (mainstream) theories are generally accepted by the scientific community, until and unless someone comes along with updated experiments/observations to either update them or disprove them. Remember, *no* theories have ever been 'proven' to be true... https://medium.com/starts-with-a-ban...f-860df13ce9e1 "I want you to think about the claims that because a scientific theory can never be 100% proven, we can never know for certain whether it’s true or not. Is it wrong to say something isn’t, therefore, real or true because we don’t have 100% proof?" - Carl Sagan Please read the entire article because it is well-written and very enlightening. You will learn something that you don't know, for sure |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Universe - What We Know
On 2/12/2018 6:33 am, wrote:
No Big Bang. Just because the local galaxies are currently seperating, doesn't mean they all sprang from a single point 13.8 billion years ago. Can anyone seriously believe that ?! Big Bang is the most ridiculous popular notion of all time ! +100 --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Universe - What We Know
On 2/12/2018 7:09 am, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:00:02 PM UTC-6, wrote: It is plain that all the galaxies are moving away from a central point. Nothing is known about "all the galaxies" since we ceratinly know nothing about galaxies more than 13.8 billion LY distant. A sample of a population says a lot. Find out how statistics are done. We only know that local galaxies seem to be CURRENTLY seperating very slowly. Why would things change? An object in motion tends to stay in motion. And just where is this "central point" ? Something that important would surely be determine, and with the aid of computers, very precisely. It is too far away to see. What, this would be the center of the universe ? RIDICULOUS ! You have a center. With this kind of thinking you must be ridiculous. You are saying this I am not. It really is retarded to think everything started from the 'big bang'. The part of the observable universe we see is far less than 1% of what's out there. We are in a tiny area that 'seems' to be expanding. I compare it to say a 100kg mass smashing into the ocean, so everything we see around that is 'expanding'. Meanwhile the rest of oceans on earth are just carrying on as normal, no 'expansion' is observable. No charge. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Universe - What We Know
On 2/12/2018 7:37 am, wrote:
Since the universe is obviously infinite, it inherently can't have any center. A center implies some overall shape with boundaries and limits which the universe certainly lacks. Correct. It seems most posters here watch too many cartoons. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Universe - What We Know
tesla sTinker wrote on 2/12/2018 6:50 AM:
big bang, was when God made the first part.Â* And that is reality. But it takes a true catholic to know that.Â*Â* Which means, one has to obey the part in God's Holy Bible, that He had said of Himself, that He did not write it all in here.Â* So of course, some things are just not explained. It does not mean, He does not exist.Â*Â* Its fact, that its all reproducing itself.Â* And only a true God of Love, could do such a thing. Â*Including the black holes in space.Â* His Holy Bible says, there are 10 levels of heaven.Â* And water above the heavens. And back when it was written, there were no telescopes. Can you please state Book and Chapter of The Bible that states "there are 10 levels of heaven"?? I cannot recall any mention of 10 levels of Heaven. -- Daniel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R(t) for Observable_Today, Universe for early universe ages | [email protected] | Research | 2 | December 13th 16 09:10 PM |
Number of Stars in Universe as f(age of universe)? | [email protected] | Research | 2 | November 27th 16 06:33 AM |
The Observed Universe, Our Universe, Our Big Bang. | Nicolaas Vroom | Research | 22 | July 22nd 14 06:29 PM |
Finite Universe - Infinite Universe. | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | June 16th 09 01:09 PM |
Infinite Universe versus volatile Universe | G. L. Bradford | Policy | 3 | June 21st 06 12:49 PM |