|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
Let me say first nature does not create in pairs for no reason. That
means now that we know about antimatter going back to Dirac(my ideal) Dirac also predicted electrons must have spin. "Thus my spin is in theory gets Dirac"s nod." WELL I live in the positron antiuniverse,and that tells you antiuniverses do exist and where all the antiparticles of the big bang ended up.Yes Bert is right handed and I am left handed Worse part is I am positive and he is negative. We have a time laps that seperates us. How much time is the kicker. At the very beginning we were so very close but that was 22 billion years ago and we have to take in space inflating. Now being Bert's twin I have to think out of the box,and predict man will create electrons,and all sub-micropartices to spin in the direction he wants. So if two universes merged they would not destroy each other. Bert and I could shake hands. Well I am giving Bert 6 lotto # and he has to play them over and over. When time they come out will tell us our time laps,and that to us is more important than money. O ya TreB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
On Nov 16, 7:21*pm, Saul Levy wrote:
Talking to yourself, BEERTbrainIDIOT? YEP! NOT GOOD! Saul Levy On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:25:38 -0800 (PST), bert wrote: Let me say first nature does not create in pairs for no reason. That means now that we know about antimatter going back to Dirac(my ideal) * Dirac also predicted electrons must have spin. "Thus my spin is in theory gets Dirac"s nod." WELL I live in the positron antiuniverse,and that tells you antiuniverses do exist and where all the antiparticles of the big bang ended up.Yes Bert is right handed and I am left handed Worse part is I am positive and he is negative. We have a time laps that seperates us. How much time is the kicker. At the very beginning we were so very close but that was 22 billion years ago and we have to take in space inflating. *Now being Bert's twin I have to think out of the box,and predict man will create electrons,and all sub-micropartices to spin in the direction he wants. *So if two universes merged they would not destroy each other. Bert and I could shake hands. * Well I am giving Bert 6 lotto # and he has to play them over and over. When time they come out will tell us our time laps,and that to us is more important than money. *O ya * TreB- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Reality is when Bert and I are thinking together we are two of the worlds greatest thinkers. Two heads are better than one. Bert and I are mother nature greatest balancing act. "You can't have one without the other" BerTreb |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
On Nov 17, 7:58*am, bert wrote:
On Nov 16, 7:21*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Talking to yourself, BEERTbrainIDIOT? YEP! NOT GOOD! Saul Levy On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:25:38 -0800 (PST), bert wrote: Let me say first nature does not create in pairs for no reason. That means now that we know about antimatter going back to Dirac(my ideal) * Dirac also predicted electrons must have spin. "Thus my spin is in theory gets Dirac"s nod." WELL I live in the positron antiuniverse,and that tells you antiuniverses do exist and where all the antiparticles of the big bang ended up.Yes Bert is right handed and I am left handed Worse part is I am positive and he is negative. We have a time laps that seperates us. How much time is the kicker. At the very beginning we were so very close but that was 22 billion years ago and we have to take in space inflating. *Now being Bert's twin I have to think out of the box,and predict man will create electrons,and all sub-micropartices to spin in the direction he wants. *So if two universes merged they would not destroy each other. Bert and I could shake hands. * Well I am giving Bert 6 lotto # and he has to play them over and over. When time they come out will tell us our time laps,and that to us is more important than money. *O ya * TreB- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Reality is when Bert and I are thinking together we are two of the worlds greatest thinkers. Two heads are better than one. Bert and I are mother nature greatest balancing act. "You *can't have one without the other" * * BerTreb- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bert and I are two sides to the same coin. We are back to back,and can see "coming and going." We see in both directions. I'm heads up and Bert is tails down. We disagree on that,but get along rather well. Bert gave me Hmmm numbers for the lotto. That's a kicker since I'm older. Bertreb |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
On Nov 19, 8:09*am, bert wrote:
On Nov 17, 7:58*am, bert wrote: On Nov 16, 7:21*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Talking to yourself, BEERTbrainIDIOT? YEP! NOT GOOD! Saul Levy On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:25:38 -0800 (PST), bert wrote: Let me say first nature does not create in pairs for no reason. That means now that we know about antimatter going back to Dirac(my ideal) * Dirac also predicted electrons must have spin. "Thus my spin is in theory gets Dirac"s nod." WELL I live in the positron antiuniverse,and that tells you antiuniverses do exist and where all the antiparticles of the big bang ended up.Yes Bert is right handed and I am left handed Worse part is I am positive and he is negative. We have a time laps that seperates us. How much time is the kicker. At the very beginning we were so very close but that was 22 billion years ago and we have to take in space inflating. *Now being Bert's twin I have to think out of the box,and predict man will create electrons,and all sub-micropartices to spin in the direction he wants. *So if two universes merged they would not destroy each other. Bert and I could shake hands. * Well I am giving Bert 6 lotto # and he has to play them over and over. When time they come out will tell us our time laps,and that to us is more important than money. *O ya * TreB- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Reality is when Bert and I are thinking together we are two of the worlds greatest thinkers. Two heads are better than one. Bert and I are mother nature greatest balancing act. "You *can't have one without the other" * * BerTreb- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bert and I are two sides to the same coin. We are back to back,and can see "coming and going." *We see in both directions. I'm heads up and Bert is tails down. We disagree on that,but get along rather well. Bert gave me Hmmm *numbers for the lotto. That's a kicker since I'm older. * Bertreb- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here is a thought We can produce anti-matter and when it hits ordinary matter it is writen its 100% energy in the form of an explosion. Hmmm I say no. Out of that energy comes trillions of neutrinos and they just about go right through matter like its the aether. TreBert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
"bert" wrote in message ... Bert and I are two sides to the same coin. We are back to back,and can see "coming and going." We see in both directions. I'm heads up and Bert is tails down. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So.......YOU are the top and Bert is the bottom? YOU are the butch and Bert is the bitch? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
On Nov 20, 6:57*am, "B-Hate-Me" wrote:
"bert" wrote in message ... Bert and I are two sides to the same coin. We are back to back,and can see "coming and going." *We see in both directions. I'm heads up and Bert is tails down. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So.......YOU are the top and Bert is the bottom? * * * * * * YOU are the butch and Bert is the bitch? Ha Ha Ha You make Bert and I like HVAC & Hagar. That is far out thinking. We are straight,and to prove it will vote for Palin in 2012. TreBert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
On Nov 19, 1:19*pm, Saul Levy wrote:
Since WHEN can we produce ANTI-MATTER, BEERTbrainIDIOT? BULL****! YOU ARE VERY SENILE! Saul Levy On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:30:54 -0800 (PST), bert wrote: Here is a thought We can produce anti-matter and when it hits ordinary matter it is writen its 100% energy in the form of an explosion. Hmmm I say no. *Out of that energy comes trillions of neutrinos and they just about go right through matter like its the aether. TreBert- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Levy if only you had a brain you could learn a lot from my posts. Antimater has opposite electric charge and opposite nuclea force charges.(please think on that) First anti-matter particle discovered was the positron. In around 1950s at U of C at Berkeley its accelerator(Bevatron produced the first antiproton.(negative charge) Cern and Fermi accelerators have created antihydrogenWOW Here is a kicker "Antimater is the most costly stuff. I will do again a What if on antimatter since I think about it often TreBert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
On Nov 16, 3:25*pm, bert wrote:
Let me say first nature does not create in pairs for no reason. That means now that we know about antimatter going back to Dirac(my ideal) * Dirac also predicted electrons must have spin. "Thus my spin is in theory gets Dirac"s nod." WELL I live in the positron antiuniverse,and that tells you antiuniverses do exist and where all the antiparticles of the big bang ended up.Yes Bert is right handed and I am left handed Worse part is I am positive and he is negative. We have a time laps that seperates us. How much time is the kicker. At the very beginning we were so very close but that was 22 billion years ago and we have to take in space inflating. *Now being Bert's twin I have to think out of the box,and predict man will create electrons,and all sub-micropartices to spin in the direction he wants. *So if two universes merged they would not destroy each other. Bert and I could shake hands. * Well I am giving Bert 6 lotto # and he has to play them over and over. When time they come out will tell us our time laps,and that to us is more important than money. *O ya * TreB Merging universes should not be much different than merging galaxies, like what happened to form the Milky Way that's made of two or more galaxies plus lots of molecular/nebula stuff picked up along the way. However, if each galaxy is contained within its own event horizon is where there could be some considerable interaction, like electrostatic charged party balloons sticking to one another or otherwise attacking one another because of polarity differences. There's still no good reason to think of another universe as antimatter, although anything is possible. ~ BG |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
On Nov 20, 8:51*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 16, 3:25*pm, bert wrote: Let me say first nature does not create in pairs for no reason. That means now that we know about antimatter going back to Dirac(my ideal) * Dirac also predicted electrons must have spin. "Thus my spin is in theory gets Dirac"s nod." WELL I live in the positron antiuniverse,and that tells you antiuniverses do exist and where all the antiparticles of the big bang ended up.Yes Bert is right handed and I am left handed Worse part is I am positive and he is negative. We have a time laps that seperates us. How much time is the kicker. At the very beginning we were so very close but that was 22 billion years ago and we have to take in space inflating. *Now being Bert's twin I have to think out of the box,and predict man will create electrons,and all sub-micropartices to spin in the direction he wants. *So if two universes merged they would not destroy each other. Bert and I could shake hands. * Well I am giving Bert 6 lotto # and he has to play them over and over. When time they come out will tell us our time laps,and that to us is more important than money. *O ya * TreB Merging universes should not be much different than merging galaxies, like what happened to form the Milky Way that's made of two or more galaxies plus lots of molecular/nebula stuff picked up along the way. However, if each galaxy is contained within its own event horizon is where there could be some considerable interaction, like electrostatic charged party balloons sticking to one another or otherwise attacking one another because of polarity differences. *There's still no good reason to think of another universe as antimatter, although anything is possible. *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My two universes created out of BB goes back to 1946. Universes are produced no different than particle pairs. Its all part of natures balancing acts. Without these balancing acts there can not be any universes in the cosmos. That is the reason I have my convex space curve. It balances out Einstein's concave space curve. That is Nobel thinking TreBert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
This is Treb Posting on "Anti-Matter"
On Nov 20, 6:06*am, bert wrote:
On Nov 20, 8:51*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 16, 3:25*pm, bert wrote: Let me say first nature does not create in pairs for no reason. That means now that we know about antimatter going back to Dirac(my ideal) * Dirac also predicted electrons must have spin. "Thus my spin is in theory gets Dirac"s nod." WELL I live in the positron antiuniverse,and that tells you antiuniverses do exist and where all the antiparticles of the big bang ended up.Yes Bert is right handed and I am left handed Worse part is I am positive and he is negative. We have a time laps that seperates us. How much time is the kicker. At the very beginning we were so very close but that was 22 billion years ago and we have to take in space inflating. *Now being Bert's twin I have to think out of the box,and predict man will create electrons,and all sub-micropartices to spin in the direction he wants. *So if two universes merged they would not destroy each other. Bert and I could shake hands. * Well I am giving Bert 6 lotto # and he has to play them over and over. When time they come out will tell us our time laps,and that to us is more important than money. *O ya * TreB Merging universes should not be much different than merging galaxies, like what happened to form the Milky Way that's made of two or more galaxies plus lots of molecular/nebula stuff picked up along the way. However, if each galaxy is contained within its own event horizon is where there could be some considerable interaction, like electrostatic charged party balloons sticking to one another or otherwise attacking one another because of polarity differences. *There's still no good reason to think of another universe as antimatter, although anything is possible. *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My two universes created out of BB goes back to 1946. Universes are produced no different than particle pairs. Its all part of natures balancing acts. Without these balancing acts there can not be any universes in the cosmos. *That is the reason I have my convex space curve. It balances out Einstein's concave space curve. *That is Nobel thinking * TreBert Yes it is Nobel worthy, and likely rabbi Saul Levy or some other born- again faith will either take all the credit or at least see that you never get any credit, because it's what they do best. I agree, there has to be at least two universes. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anti Gavity Anti Matter Anti universe Treb & Bert = | bert | Misc | 5 | July 25th 10 01:40 PM |
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillati | [email protected][_2_] | Misc | 8 | November 9th 07 05:57 AM |
" Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of relativity" finally | xszxsz | Science | 0 | October 28th 04 08:54 AM |