A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The correct explanation for the twin paradox



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 16th 17, 10:13 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default The correct explanation for the twin paradox

On Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 9:24:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

kenseto wrote:

On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:00:56 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 5:55:17 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 9:20:21 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 2:27:42 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 9:25:56 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 12:18:20 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

During B’s entire journey B’s clock accumulates clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma than A. At no time B observe A’s clock accumulate clock seconds at a slower rate than B’s clock. Why? Because B’s clock second contains a larger amount of time (absolute time) than A’s clock second. IOW, a clock second is NOT A UNIVERSAL INTERVAL OF ABSOLUTE TIME in different frames. It contains a different amount of absolute time in different frames.

This explanation is confirmed by the GPS. A GPS second is redefined to have 4.4647 more periods of Cs 133 radiation than the ground clock second. This is designed to make the passage of a redefined GPS second corresponds to the passage of a stand ground clock second and thus making the GPS permanently in synch with the ground clock in terms of absolute time.


if time would to stop for 5 minutes universally, would anyone be aware
of it?

There is no way to stop the passage of absolute time. You can stop the passage of clock time by damaging the clock but the passage of absolute time continues.



if time can start, it can stop..

Yes.....clock time can start and stop. But not absolute time.

it can even slow down, or speed up.

Similarly clock time can slow down or speed up but not absolute time.



...and time can turnaround and go back.

No.....absolute time moves in one direction....it can only move forward into the future.


(and i ain't talkin bout clocks)


there is no future for time to 'move into'.

Is tomorrow not the future????



does the future exist without time?

The future and absolute time always exist. Tomorrow (he future) and 24 hours (absolute time) from now exists simultaneously.


The future and time exist simultaneously, but there is no...tomorrow.

Tomorrow and time exist simultaneously at tomorrow.

but not after tomorrow.

if two weeks from now is the future, and you got a glimpse of it, what
will you see?


I'll explain what you will see because it's not information that exist anywhere else...

If you got a glimpse of the future...stuck your head in and took a look...what you will see is...NOTHING.

It's Blank! Pure white. No earth, no stars, no universe...nothing. Nothing happen yet.

It has to develope with time...like developing a photograph in the darkroom...eventually everything begins to come about.


I mean, you people don't acutally believe that there are people walking around in the future, do you????


  #2  
Old July 16th 17, 10:19 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default The correct explanation for the twin paradox

On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 2:13:09 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 9:24:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

kenseto wrote:

On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:00:56 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 5:55:17 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 9:20:21 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 2:27:42 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 9:25:56 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 12:18:20 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
kenseto wrote:

During B’s entire journey B’s clock accumulates clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma than A. At no time B observe A’s clock accumulate clock seconds at a slower rate than B’s clock. Why? Because B’s clock second contains a larger amount of time (absolute time) than A’s clock second. IOW, a clock second is NOT A UNIVERSAL INTERVAL OF ABSOLUTE TIME in different frames. It contains a different amount of absolute time in different frames.

This explanation is confirmed by the GPS. A GPS second is redefined to have 4.4647 more periods of Cs 133 radiation than the ground clock second. This is designed to make the passage of a redefined GPS second corresponds to the passage of a stand ground clock second and thus making the GPS permanently in synch with the ground clock in terms of absolute time.


if time would to stop for 5 minutes universally, would anyone be aware
of it?

There is no way to stop the passage of absolute time. You can stop the passage of clock time by damaging the clock but the passage of absolute time continues.



if time can start, it can stop..

Yes.....clock time can start and stop. But not absolute time.

it can even slow down, or speed up.

Similarly clock time can slow down or speed up but not absolute time.



...and time can turnaround and go back.

No.....absolute time moves in one direction....it can only move forward into the future.


(and i ain't talkin bout clocks)


there is no future for time to 'move into'.

Is tomorrow not the future????



does the future exist without time?

The future and absolute time always exist. Tomorrow (he future) and 24 hours (absolute time) from now exists simultaneously.


The future and time exist simultaneously, but there is no...tomorrow.

Tomorrow and time exist simultaneously at tomorrow.

but not after tomorrow.

if two weeks from now is the future, and you got a glimpse of it, what
will you see?

I'll explain what you will see because it's not information that exist anywhere else...

If you got a glimpse of the future...stuck your head in and took a look..what you will see is...NOTHING.

It's Blank! Pure white. No earth, no stars, no universe...nothing. Nothing happen yet.

It has to develope with time...like developing a photograph in the darkroom...eventually everything begins to come about.


I mean, you people don't acutally believe that there are people walking around in the future, do you????



Twin peaks are always nice!

Double-A

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The correct explanation for the twin paradox Herbert Glazier Misc 0 July 14th 17 07:02 PM
The correct explanation for the twin paradox Arc Michael Misc 0 July 14th 17 05:59 AM
THE SILLIEST EXPLANATION OF THE TWIN PARADOX Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 December 15th 13 10:20 AM
New Improved Twin Paradox Explanation Jonathan Doolin Astronomy Misc 96 January 15th 09 06:12 PM
Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation. Der alte Hexenmeister Astronomy Misc 40 January 12th 06 03:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.