|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
global warming trend continues
On Jan 16, 7:49*pm, oriel36 wrote:
On Jan 17, 12:10*am, Mike Collins wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0115190218.htm 2012 Sustained Long-Term Climate Warming Trend, NASA Finds Jan. 15, 2013 — NASA scientists say 2012 was the ninth warmest of any year since 1880, continuing a long-term trend of rising global temperatures. With the exception of 1998, the nine warmest years in the 132-year record all have occurred since 2000, with 2010 and 2005 ranking as the hottest years on record. This is really a cult phenomena due to the dominance of mathematical modelers as it preys on genuine human concern for the planet while having no respect or appreciation whatsoever for basic planetary facts.People with a healthy and vibrant appreciation of the connection between planetary cycles and terrestrial effects from the daily effects to annual effects to longer term cycle would develop a more practical approach to pollution without these ridiculous assertions that are getting more and more desperate in tone.It sounds like a bunch of people who predict that 3 AM is the darkest hour on record without keeping an eye on the fact that it will become bright once again in a few hours and considering that the same cult refuses to accept that a 24 hour AM/PM cycle keeps in step with one rotation,this is less an analogy than a really,really dismal fact. I do not know what the big deal is - a planet with zero inclination, where the daily rotational axis aligns with the ecliptic axis, will experience equatorial conditions rather than the older 'no tilt/no seasons' perspective while a planet with a 90 degree inclination reflects a polar climate.The newness of this planetary climate spectrum is all the more reason to stop and consider what the main components are by using planetary comparisons or by direct observations that explain why we have the seasons. Grow up for goodness sake,what the world is seeing is an empirical game like those simulated games kids play. Indeed, the more tilt the more global warmth, including increased geothermal upwelling via tidal flexing. However, by any means of measure us humans are not providing any cooling benefits. The ongoing loss of helium isn't exactly cooling us off, although the refrigeration affect should be worth some degree of heat exchange. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
global warming trend continues
It is not that there are many billions of dollars spent each year on
what are effectively competing climate models as modeling itself is the core problem,it is that even when faced with intelligent arguments that introduce a planetary climate spectrum there is precious little recognition of this observational certainty.The slightest adjustment from 'no seasons' to a more productive perspective of 'equatorial conditions' opens up a vista where the degree of inclination is assigned its proper role in determining how great or how little the latitudinal swings in temperature and daylight/darkness are for any given planet. The prevalence of media as a means to label every meteorological event as an indicator of 'climate change' is dismaying,our planet's climate is fixed by the interaction between daily and orbital motions and their respective traits,distance from the Sun while all other inputs are secondary such as oceans, landmass, atmospheric composition and multiple other factors.In short,climate fits within astronomy and those who work at the intersection between planetary dynamics and terrestrial effects rather than simulated modeling inherited from a vicious strain of empiricism. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
global warming trend continues
On Jan 19, 10:50*pm, oriel36 wrote:
It is not that there are many billions of dollars spent each year on what are effectively competing climate models as modeling itself is the core problem,it is that even when faced with intelligent arguments that introduce a planetary climate spectrum there is precious little recognition of this observational certainty.The slightest adjustment from 'no seasons' to a more productive perspective of 'equatorial conditions' opens up a vista where the degree of inclination is assigned its proper role in determining how great or how little the latitudinal swings in temperature and daylight/darkness are for any given planet. The prevalence of media as a means to label every meteorological event as an indicator of 'climate change' is dismaying,our planet's climate is fixed by the interaction between daily and orbital motions and their respective traits,distance from the Sun while all other inputs are secondary such as oceans, landmass, atmospheric composition and multiple other factors.In short,climate fits within astronomy and those who work at the intersection between planetary dynamics and terrestrial effects rather than simulated modeling inherited from a vicious strain of empiricism. So, how badly are these peers lying to us, or how much truth are they holding back? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Global warming BS | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 108 | January 20th 08 01:38 AM |
dinosaur extinction/global cooling &human extinction/global warming | 281979 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 17th 06 01:05 PM |
Solar warming v. Global warming | Roger Steer | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | October 20th 05 01:23 AM |
Global warming v. Solar warming | Roger Steer | UK Astronomy | 1 | October 18th 05 10:58 AM |