|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ
Yep.
If you have any pictures of it not landing - please post. Otherwise s*d off. "Jaxtraw" wrote in message . .. "Mark Underwood" wrote in message ... Oh Just go away .. this is an astronomy site anyway ...lol Also, it may be a good idea not to repost the entire thing when replying to it. Ian |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ
(5)No Stars ?.....2 stars are in this image.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...-40-5916HR.jpg -- Michael Orange Park,FL http://www.bellsouthpwp.net/k/h/khogue22/index.htm |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ
"Michael" wrote in message ... | (5)No Stars ?.....2 stars are in this image. | | http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...-40-5916HR.jpg Sorry, almost certainly not. A white speck is not automatically a star. At the exposures consistent with Apollo 11 photography, no stars are bright enough to expose Ektachrome film. You would need an exposure of at least several seconds -- probably 30 -- before stars began to show up. -- | The universe is not required to conform | Jay Windley to the expectations of the ignorant. | webmaster @ clavius.org |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ
In ,
Jay Windley typed: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...-40-5916HR.jpg Sorry, almost certainly not. A white speck is not automatically a star. At the exposures consistent with Apollo 11 photography, no I haven't researched this myself...but are there many cosmic ray tracks in the original emulsions? Jo |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ
"Jo" wrote in message ... | | I haven't researched this myself...but are there many cosmic ray tracks in | the original emulsions? Not that I've seen. I've studied the photos very carefully and haven't seen any artifacts I could conclusively attribute to cosmic rays. But the film they used in 1969 is quite a bit less sensitive compared to the film we use today. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ
Now we can rest for another 6 - 8 weeks while this spammer goes back to
his/her Noddy book. On 22 Jul 2004 11:54:00 -0000, darla wrote: THE APOLLO HOAX FAQ version 4.3 - July 2004 Written by Nathan Jones Who? No such known person. A person is one whom can be identified and contacted. Subject: (1) Forward and Intent |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Astronomy Misc | 11 | April 22nd 04 06:23 AM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | November 7th 03 08:53 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ v4 | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 4th 03 11:52 PM |
If Liberty bells hatch hadnt blown? | Hallerb | History | 28 | August 30th 03 02:57 AM |