#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
The number of CHINK spam ads is in inverse proportion to the number of
astronomical posts. Once astro posts reach about 20 per day, the spam ads disappear. You'll see this on most forums. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
In Epsilon Eridani
wrote: The number of CHINK spam ads is in inverse proportion to the number of astronomical posts. Once astro posts reach about 20 per day, the spam ads disappear. You'll see this on most forums. Not likely. For that to happen, the spammers would have to actually read all the groups to which they post. More unlikely, they'd have to care. -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
On Dec 11, 1:12*am, Davoud wrote:
I would just as soon read spam as racist hate speech. "CHINK:" rhymes with "PLINK." And books with cooks and cookes. :-) Derogatory terms have always been used to dehumanise those one despises. The standard training for those going to war (or even in sport) is to find a name which sums up your enemy in the worst possible light. Often as a simple play on words or a corruption of the name of your "enemy". Roman Paedophilic Church... for example. If one pretended to be a true Christian fighting centuries of injustice for the innocent child. Not to mention the countless AIDS and sexually transmitted disease infected rape victims of the churches' local debt collector, paedophile network. Plink or plonk. It makes you think. The RP Church stinks. Papa or Pope Given a man an inch, of rope |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
Davoud wrote in :
Epsilon Eridani wrote: The number of CHINK spam ads... I would just as soon read spam as racist hate speech. "CHINK:" rhymes with "PLINK." Davoud Because you are a moron who shops Chinkware at Walmart, happily. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
Epsilon Eridani wrote:
The number of CHINK spam ads is in inverse proportion to the number of astronomical posts. Once astro posts reach about 20 per day, the spam ads disappear. You'll see this on most forums. Don't suppose you'd care to post any astro articles, ****head? Now about that new Orion $50 FunScope 76mm Reflector Telescope, maybe compared to the $50 Celestron FirstScope. Any comments on them? -- Tom "Go Pack" McDonald |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
X: no-archive
Epsilon Eridani wrote in : The number of CHINK spam ads is in inverse proportion to the number of astronomical posts. Once astro posts reach about 20 per day, the spam ads disappear. You'll see this on most forums. Your racist quip aside, the problem has to be laid at Google's feet. Google purchased dejanews.com some years ago with the promise that they intended to preserve the usenet legacy as an archival knowledge source. Apparently, Google no longer feels it is cost effective to use spam filters. As a result for their web based usenet portal. As a result, web based browsing of usenet is effectively dead. The only way it is useable is to adopt a newsreader that supports slrn filtering. My speculation is that Google now wants usenet to die as a business strategy because they want the bandwidth to resell services to high-end mobile phone owners with a greater willingness to pay. This does not bode well for Google's recent gaining of control over the rights to digitally distribute books. Will Google online books get up one morning and make the decision that Chaucer is "not cost effective" to keep on their book server? - Canopus56 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
canopus56 wrote:
My speculation is that Google now wants usenet to die as a business strategy because they want the bandwidth to resell services to high-end mobile phone owners with a greater willingness to pay. This does not bode well for Google's recent gaining of control over the rights to digitally distribute books. Will Google online books get up one morning and make the decision that Chaucer is "not cost effective" to keep on their book server? In a society in which health "insurance" companies deny treatment to sick people because they judge the person's dollar value to be too low (infants, children, low-income people, mothers who don't work outside the home, non-whites, retired persons) it doesn't strain the imagination to envision Google declaring that Chaucer has no value. Davoud -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
Tom McDonald wrote in
: Epsilon Eridani wrote: The number of CHINK spam ads is in inverse proportion to the number of astronomical posts. Once astro posts reach about 20 per day, the spam ads disappear. You'll see this on most forums. Don't suppose you'd care to post any astro articles, ****head? Now about that new Orion $50 FunScope 76mm Reflector Telescope, maybe compared to the $50 Celestron FirstScope. Any comments on them? Sounds like typical, made-in-China garbage. Parents who'd buy their kid a $50 telescope probably spend the rest of their money on crack, cigarettes and beer. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
canopus56 wrote in
52: X: no-archive Epsilon Eridani wrote in : The number of CHINK spam ads is in inverse proportion to the number of astronomical posts. Once astro posts reach about 20 per day, the spam ads disappear. You'll see this on most forums. Your racist quip aside, the problem has to be laid at Google's feet. Uh huh. Kind of like blaming the gun for shooting someone and not the shooter. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Newsgroup math
Epsilon Eridani wrote:
Now about that new Orion $50 FunScope 76mm Reflector Telescope, maybe compared to the $50 Celestron FirstScope. Any comments on them? Sounds like typical, made-in-China garbage. Parents who'd buy their kid a $50 telescope probably spend the rest of their money on crack, cigarettes and beer. I got one, but not for viewing, but for all the outreaches I do at schools. Between that, and the Galileoscope, they make excellent indoor presentation tools !!! Great for young kid's to paw all over. Never looked through mine, but hundreds of kid's have played with it indoors. Worth it for that alone ! And BTW, the Chinese made Meade UWA eyepieces are very nice............ -- AM http://sctuser.home.comcast.net http://www.novac.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newsgroup math | Davoud[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 11th 09 01:12 AM |
Why does SRT and LET have identical Math??? | kenseto | Astronomy Misc | 58 | January 12th 07 04:19 PM |
Math for Astrophysics | Steve Willner | Research | 0 | November 8th 06 12:17 AM |
gravity math | no way | Misc | 12 | July 18th 04 10:20 PM |
mystic math | Ian Beardsley | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | May 17th 04 04:52 AM |