A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » News
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Black holes aren't (Forwarded)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 22nd 07, 01:02 AM posted to sci.space.news
Andrew Yee[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,209
Default Black holes aren't (Forwarded)

Media Relations
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio

For more information contact:

Susan Griffith, 216-368-1004

June 20, 2007

Black holes aren't

Case researchers may have solved information loss paradox to find black
holes do not form

"Nothing there," is what Case Western Reserve University physicists
concluded about black holes after spending a year working on complex
formulas to calculate the formation of new black holes. In nearly 13 printed
pages with a host of calculations, the research may solve the information
loss paradox that has perplexed physicists for the past 40 years.

Case physicists Tanmay Vachaspati, Dejan Stojkovic and Lawrence M. Krauss
report in the article, "Observation of Incipient Black Holes and the
Information Loss Problem," that has been accepted for publication by
Physical Review D.

"It's complicated and very complex," noted the researchers, regarding both
the general problem and their particular approach to try to solve it.

The question that the physicists set out to solve is: what happens once
something collapses into a black hole? If all information about the
collapsing matter is lost, it defies the laws of quantum physics. Yet, in
current thinking, once the matter goes over the event horizon and forms a
black hole, all information about it is lost.

"If you define the black hole as some place where you can lose objects, then
there is no such thing because the black hole evaporates before anything is
seen to fall in," said Vachaspati.

The masses on the edge of the incipient black hole continue to appear into
infinity that they are collapsing but never fall over inside what is known
as the event horizon, the region from which there is no return, according to
the researchers.

By starting out with something that was nonsingular and then collapsing that
matter, they were determined to see if an event horizon formed, signaling
the creation of a black hole.

The mass shrinks in size, but it never gets to collapse inside an event
horizon due to evidence of pre-Hawking radiation, a non-thermal radiation
that allows information of the nature of what is collapsing to be recovered
far from the collapsing mass.

"Non-thermal radiation can carry information in it unlike thermal radiation.
This means that an outside observer watching some object collapse receives
non-thermal radiation back and may be able to reconstruct all the
information in the initial object and so the information never gets lost,"
they said.

According to the researchers, if black holes exist, information formed in
the initial state would disappear in the black hole through a burst of
thermal radiation that carries no information about the initial state.

Using the functional Schrodinger formalism, the researchers suggest that
information about the energy from radiation is long evaporated before an
event horizon forms.

"An outside observer will never lose an object down a black hole," said
Stojkovic. "If you are sitting outside and throwing something into the black
hole, it will never pass over but will stay outside the event horizon even
if one considers the effects of quantum mechanics. In fact, since in quantum
mechanics the observer plays an important role in measurement, the question
of formation of an event horizon is much more subtle to consider."

The physicists are quick to assure astronomers and astrophysicists that what
is observed in gravity pulling masses together still holds true, but what is
controversial about the new finding is that "from an external viewer's point
it takes an infinite amount of time to form an event horizon and that the
clock for the objects falling into the black hole appears to slow down to
zero," said Krauss, director of Case's Center for Education and Research in
Cosmology.

He continued "this is one of the factors that led us to rethink this
problem, and we hope our proposal at the very least will stimulate a broader
reconsideration of these issues."

If black holes exist in the universe, the astrophysicists speculate they
were formed only at the beginning of time.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Are Galaxies without Black Holes Uncommon? (Forwarded) Andrew Yee[_1_] News 0 June 7th 07 07:58 PM
The Loneliest Black Holes in the Universe (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 June 6th 07 10:27 PM
The Loneliest Black Holes in the Universe (Forwarded) Andrew Yee[_1_] News 0 June 6th 07 09:38 PM
Black Holes Aren't So Black (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 2 October 5th 05 10:57 PM
Black Holes Aren't So Black (Forwarded) Andrew Yee News 0 October 3rd 05 03:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.