|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
USA to return to Moon
In article ,
"Dr. O" dr.o@xxxxx wrote: "Steve Dufour" wrote in message om... NASA plans return to moon By Frank Sietzen Jr. and Keith L. Cowing UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL NASA plans to scrap its space shuttle fleet to pay for the agency's new plan to return to the moon and develop human space exploration systems, senior administration officials said. Unfortunately, this sounds like another 'footprints' mission. There isn't a real long-term vision of exploration or commercial exploitation. The thing I fear most is that once people land on Mars, interest in the space program will falter, resulting in another long gap between it and the next human space venture. What worries me even more is what the impact of this will be on any COMMERCIAL manned space exploration (i.e. tourism, mining, colonization) efforts. Does anyone have a clue? Could it be that the X-Prize follow up will simply be deemed irrelevant because it's dwarfed by the manned Mars effort? I'm not sure I follow your logic. Why should the X-Prize "be deemed irrelevant" simply because the American government might want to send astronauts to Mars? I'd have thought that if such a program succeeded it would open up new opportunities. In any case, America has spent billions on the ISS yet the X Prize has not suffered AFAIK, even though what the US has done (and spent) on the ISS probably dwarfs the X Prize contestants' own efforts on their X Prize efforts. Will it dampen or even kill the market for commercial rockets (non-military vehicles)? If we're still talking about commercial "manned space exploration"... What market? Thus far only the Russians have sent paying customers into orbit, and they did it using their own hardware and the customers were sent to a government-paid-for facility. You can't "dampen" (much less "kill") what does not yet exist. Or which at best still only exists on paper. In any case, why would going to Mars dampen the enthusiasm of potential customers for going on trips into Earth orbit? I'd have thought it would be more likely to broaden any future market by providing potential new destinations for the customers to (one day) go to. How about venture capital not being awarded to some guy who wants to build a commercial manned orbital vehicle? Again why? Does the venture capital market for (say) tourist resorts plummet every time governments spend billions on dams, highways, or other projects? Will there be less need for "commercial manned orbital vehicles"? Will Bush be funding his Mars program using venture capital (as opposed to taxes)? Let's not panic just yet. Nothing has been announced officially. It could just be somebody flying another kite. -- Stephen Souter http://www.edfac.usyd.edu.au/staff/souters/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The New NASA Mission Has Been Grossly Mischaracterized. | Dan Hanson | Policy | 25 | January 26th 04 08:42 PM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 05:29 PM |
The November 8th Total Eclipse of the Moon | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | October 28th 03 08:31 PM |