|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#662
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth's Credentials
Malcolm Reynolds wrote:
Good haiku, Brad! suck and blow...salty passive ... hulk ... dark and thick ... hard... it was a freebie Dear Mr. out-of-context borg and Third Reich collaborator). Up yours, and may Usama bin Laden find your family a good example target of what a true infidel represents. May something of incest eat you and your family from the inside out. - Brad Guth |
#663
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth's Credentials
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
oups.com... Dear Mr. out-of-context borg and Third Reich collaborator). Up yours, Up my what, Brad? Buttcheeks again? Why are you so infatuated with people's nether regions? and may Usama bin Laden find your family a good example target of what a true infidel represents. Why should I care what that smelly, hairy ape (or any of your other relatives) thinks of my family? May something of incest eat you and your family from the inside out. It's odd that you should say that, because that's exactly what the nanobacteria (which we engineered specifically to target your individual DNA) is going to do to your brain. Munch. Munch. Munch. |
#664
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth's Credentials
Malcolm Reynolds wrote: Up my what, Brad? Buttcheeks again? Why are you so infatuated with people's nether regions? and may Usama bin Laden find your family a good example target of what a true infidel represents. Why should I care what that smelly, hairy ape (or any of your other relatives) thinks of my family? May something of incest eat you and your family from the inside out. It's odd that you should say that, because that's exactly what the nanobacteria (which we engineered specifically to target your individual DNA) is going to do to your brain. Munch. Munch. Munch. Since you folks and even our 100% snookered and summarily dumbfounded "tomcat" are obviously not going to stop posting into this topic, in which case I'll have to share and share alike by way of keeping my battery of lose cannons, that are situated on my nifty poopdeck of truth, as firing at will. There's a damn good reason why the LSE-CM/ISS offers the one and only way to fly, whereas besides the obvious need for physical protection, it has to do with our frail DNA surviving any sort of home away from home environment in spite of what our moon represents. There's not much point in our having such a science and space-station depot in the sky if your DNA can't take a licking and keep on ticking, as you can't count on banked bone marrow or stem-cells saving each and every bad day. The surface of our moon is perhaps never going to be artificially terraformed sufficiently into becoming suitable for us as naked humans unless we biologically mutate into becoming a hybrid cloned species of rad-hard DNA, whereas no amount of religious superiority, arrogance, greed and bigotry is ever going to cut through or otherwise avoid the reality of the truth. Even by earthshine is sufficiently lethal within hours if not near instantly going TBI red-line if there's much of anything cosmic or solar nasty going on. Even the bimonthly trail or back/head pressure from Earth of what the solar wind has enstore, thats extensively diverted around Earth because of our magnetosphere, isn't exactly moderating the situation on behalf of the moon. In other words, that moon environment would actually be better off as a small planet if it were not for Earth. I'm thinking it's technically possible to construct and reasonably sustain a better lunar atmosphere that'll still remain as unacceptable for us naked humans, but would otherwise greatly enhance our limited DNA capability as to working within that new and improved environment for days on end by wearing moonsuits and keeping ourselves as much as possible within earthshine, or otherwise sufficiently underground. And why may I ask, as to other than our going by the infomercial-science via NASA/Apollo, do you folks insist upon thinking the moon itself isn't a whole lot worse off than whatever the Van Allen zone of death has to offer? In place of using a given volume of water which is actually damn risky business if doing such upon the moon, whereas utilizing solids of slightly greater than 1 g/cm3 is becoming the norm, though even the use of leaded polyethalene or various other UHMWPE substances isn't worth squat up against the really hard-X-rays, as such even leaded polyethalene represents a relatively low density shield that is nearly transparent to gamma, though otherwise remains as unavoidably 100% reactive. At least that's what the laws of physics and of hard-science that's easily replicated proves is the case. Your basic "polyethalene" substance is similar to the benefits of being surrounded by an equal volume of water, except without all the containment and thermal dynamic complications of what that water represents as being a non-structural substance, potentially corrosive and essentially explosive within such a near vacuum and otherwise hot environment, not to mention those eventual leakage factors from micro impacts that are 100% unavoidable. Supposed individuals that are actually a acting/reacting as a Usenet collective that's very borg like in most every way, that are steadfast/mindset in their naysay and otherwise opposition to each and everything I'm having to say, are now into calling their Einstein god and every other physics abiding soul a lunatic, and to think that most of you don't even realize where the name "lunatic" originally came from. How absolutely pathetic, and no wonder we had to perpetrate that cold-war and sad that we're currently at war with the likes of Muslims while building that 104 acre private city within a city of Iraq (isn't Muslim oil precious, even if it's a little bloody?). If you believe we've walked on the moon, in that case our naked moon must have been protected by a very large and magical NASA/Apollo fart, because without that protective surround of flatulence there's nothing much other preventing the solar and cosmic influx from reacting as it should have with the little amount of the local sodium and of a few other heavy elements worth of atmosphere, thereby easily impacting into the moon surface itself, as to be interacting and thereby creating those extra secondary/recoil worth of nasty hard-X-rays. The moon itself is as it should be very much the anti-cathode of what happens naturally and unavoidably to such a naked orb as our moon. From the physically dark and nasty deck of our moon, it simply is not as such actually looking as though depicted by any of those phony and otherwise bogus NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moments, as that of a guano island likeness of artificially modified terrain, of hosting such few and eroded rocks as depicted within the foreground and otherwise having those clean and soft rolling hills in the background, much less likely of hosting an average 0.55 albedo that's also offering such a thin clumping layer of what looks exactly like a 50/50 blend of portland cement and cornmeal, along with those entirely empty cracks within those close-up photographed big rocks that were making it look as though their artificial dusting process hadn't quite accomplished the intended task. Our otherwise salty moon is unfortunately not actually that of a relatively clean guano rock that's covered in such a thin passive clumping layer of moon-dust that isn't the least bit electrostatic, much less as having been so nicely xenon/artificial lamp spectrum illuminated instead of by the raw solar spectrum. Whereas instead, it should have been of a nearly coal like basalt hulk that's covered in a physically dark and thick composite layer of solar and cosmic debris, of carbon/soot plus all sorts of nifty minerals and rare elements including countless spores that are most likely terminal because of their having been exposed to getting double-IR roasted and summarily TBI to death for at least many thousands of years since having lost it's thick coating of salty ice, as ever since unavoidably having been passing through the very same gauntlet of space as essentially naked and thereby unavoidably receiving the fullest of influx and via gravity holding onto the very same sorts of solar and cosmic energy and of collecting radioactive substances as that of what our magnetosphere accomplishes on behalf of representing our absolutely lethal Van Allen belts, thereby making our moon worse off than any Van Allen zone environment which itself can easily represent the average of 23 rads per hour while shielded behind 2 g/cm2 (that's similar to 5/16" worth of 5086 of aluminum), and that dosage can easily become 10 fold worse off if it's having been one of those unusually bad solar/cosmic years, with an individual event that can last for hours on end being worth a greater dosage factor than our saturated instruments can manage to record (we're talking several thousand rads/hr). Of course our frail human DNA has certain limits as to how much of our DNA can be damaged by such radiation at any one time without your body going into auto-rejection mode, as it isn't based upon any such stinking average annual dosage, but upon the right here and now of whatever is being made available at the time and place of any given space travel or of those supposed EVA associations with that of our fully reactive and unavoidably radioactive moon, and if that's within moonsuits offering less than half the shielding benefit is obviously going to allow a greater dosage than any attenuation afforded by the 2 g/cm2 worth of aluminum. Of course, spacecrafts and moonsuits themselves are going to unavoidably represent additional reactive elements for the local, solar and cosmic gamma radiation to interact with, that'll unavoidably create those secondary/recoil contributions of the much nastier DNA killings via X-rays. Having a cash of your own banked bone marrow doesn't represent a 100% insurance plan if for example your eyes were damaged, and even at best the access to that banked bone marrow and stem-cells could be as much as 5 days away unless you've got an express form of returning yourself to Earth. I guess that's why I've elected on behalf of my LSE-CM/ISS to having the 50t/m2 or 5 kg/cm2 as the shield for the mostly basalt composite hull of the 256e6 tonne CM/ISS, as representing my primary insurance plan, especially since being continually situated in front of that nasty moon and only 60,000 km away from what has been officially recorded as representing the hottest local source of gamma and X-rays. Unfortunately we still have nothing of any science platform situated within LL-1, therefore hard-science numbers are difficult to impossible to extract or even speculate since that nearby nullification zone has been kept scientifically as taboo/nondisclosure as the moon itself. Basically, we know a whole lot more about all of those Iraqi WMD and of where Usama bin Laden is camping out than we do about LL-1. - Brad Guth |
#665
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth's Credentials
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
ups.com... Since you folks and even our 100% snookered and summarily dumbfounded Actually, it's YOU, Brad, who is 100% snookered and dumb. And nobody reads your 1000+ lines of bull**** psycho-drivel, so why do you bother? Munch... Munch... Munch! |
#666
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth's Credentials
He right Brad, I don't read them either, I mean, I may skim thru a line or two or three but that's about it. I get thru a few lines and it's all the same, so I stop. I'm being sincere here, lets see you do the same. Malcolm Reynolds wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ups.com... Since you folks and even our 100% snookered and summarily dumbfounded Actually, it's YOU, Brad, who is 100% snookered and dumb. And nobody reads your 1000+ lines of bull**** psycho-drivel, so why do you bother? Munch... Munch... Munch! |
#667
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth's Credentials
Brad Guth wrote: Malcolm Reynolds wrote: Up my what, Brad? Buttcheeks again? Why are you so infatuated with people's nether regions? and may Usama bin Laden find your family a good example target of what a true infidel represents. Why should I care what that smelly, hairy ape (or any of your other relatives) thinks of my family? May something of incest eat you and your family from the inside out. It's odd that you should say that, because that's exactly what the nanobacteria (which we engineered specifically to target your individual DNA) is going to do to your brain. Munch. Munch. Munch. Since you folks and even our 100% snookered and summarily dumbfounded "tomcat" are obviously not going to stop posting into this topic, in which case I'll have to share and share alike by way of keeping my battery of lose cannons, that are situated on my nifty poopdeck of truth, as firing at will. There's a damn good reason why the LSE-CM/ISS offers the one and only way to fly, whereas besides the obvious need for physical protection, it has to do with our frail DNA surviving any sort of home away from home environment in spite of what our moon represents. There's not much point in our having such a science and space-station depot in the sky if your DNA can't take a licking and keep on ticking, as you can't count on banked bone marrow or stem-cells saving each and every bad day. The surface of our moon is perhaps never going to be artificially terraformed sufficiently into becoming suitable for us as naked humans unless we biologically mutate into becoming a hybrid cloned species of rad-hard DNA, whereas no amount of religious superiority, arrogance, greed and bigotry is ever going to cut through or otherwise avoid the reality of the truth. Even by earthshine is sufficiently lethal within hours if not near instantly going TBI red-line if there's much of anything cosmic or solar nasty going on. Even the bimonthly trail or back/head pressure from Earth of what the solar wind has enstore, thats extensively diverted around Earth because of our magnetosphere, isn't exactly moderating the situation on behalf of the moon. In other words, that moon environment would actually be better off as a small planet if it were not for Earth. I'm thinking it's technically possible to construct and reasonably sustain a better lunar atmosphere that'll still remain as unacceptable for us naked humans, but would otherwise greatly enhance our limited DNA capability as to working within that new and improved environment for days on end by wearing moonsuits and keeping ourselves as much as possible within earthshine, or otherwise sufficiently underground. And why may I ask, as to other than our going by the infomercial-science via NASA/Apollo, do you folks insist upon thinking the moon itself isn't a whole lot worse off than whatever the Van Allen zone of death has to offer? In place of using a given volume of water which is actually damn risky business if doing such upon the moon, whereas utilizing solids of slightly greater than 1 g/cm3 is becoming the norm, though even the use of leaded polyethalene or various other UHMWPE substances isn't worth squat up against the really hard-X-rays, as such even leaded polyethalene represents a relatively low density shield that is nearly transparent to gamma, though otherwise remains as unavoidably 100% reactive. At least that's what the laws of physics and of hard-science that's easily replicated proves is the case. Your basic "polyethalene" substance is similar to the benefits of being surrounded by an equal volume of water, except without all the containment and thermal dynamic complications of what that water represents as being a non-structural substance, potentially corrosive and essentially explosive within such a near vacuum and otherwise hot environment, not to mention those eventual leakage factors from micro impacts that are 100% unavoidable. Supposed individuals that are actually a acting/reacting as a Usenet collective that's very borg like in most every way, that are steadfast/mindset in their naysay and otherwise opposition to each and everything I'm having to say, are now into calling their Einstein god and every other physics abiding soul a lunatic, and to think that most of you don't even realize where the name "lunatic" originally came from. How absolutely pathetic, and no wonder we had to perpetrate that cold-war and sad that we're currently at war with the likes of Muslims while building that 104 acre private city within a city of Iraq (isn't Muslim oil precious, even if it's a little bloody?). If you believe we've walked on the moon, in that case our naked moon must have been protected by a very large and magical NASA/Apollo fart, because without that protective surround of flatulence there's nothing much other preventing the solar and cosmic influx from reacting as it should have with the little amount of the local sodium and of a few other heavy elements worth of atmosphere, thereby easily impacting into the moon surface itself, as to be interacting and thereby creating those extra secondary/recoil worth of nasty hard-X-rays. The moon itself is as it should be very much the anti-cathode of what happens naturally and unavoidably to such a naked orb as our moon. From the physically dark and nasty deck of our moon, it simply is not as such actually looking as though depicted by any of those phony and otherwise bogus NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moments, as that of a guano island likeness of artificially modified terrain, of hosting such few and eroded rocks as depicted within the foreground and otherwise having those clean and soft rolling hills in the background, much less likely of hosting an average 0.55 albedo that's also offering such a thin clumping layer of what looks exactly like a 50/50 blend of portland cement and cornmeal, along with those entirely empty cracks within those close-up photographed big rocks that were making it look as though their artificial dusting process hadn't quite accomplished the intended task. Our otherwise salty moon is unfortunately not actually that of a relatively clean guano rock that's covered in such a thin passive clumping layer of moon-dust that isn't the least bit electrostatic, much less as having been so nicely xenon/artificial lamp spectrum illuminated instead of by the raw solar spectrum. Whereas instead, it should have been of a nearly coal like basalt hulk that's covered in a physically dark and thick composite layer of solar and cosmic debris, of carbon/soot plus all sorts of nifty minerals and rare elements including countless spores that are most likely terminal because of their having been exposed to getting double-IR roasted and summarily TBI to death for at least many thousands of years since having lost it's thick coating of salty ice, as ever since unavoidably having been passing through the very same gauntlet of space as essentially naked and thereby unavoidably receiving the fullest of influx and via gravity holding onto the very same sorts of solar and cosmic energy and of collecting radioactive substances as that of what our magnetosphere accomplishes on behalf of representing our absolutely lethal Van Allen belts, thereby making our moon worse off than any Van Allen zone environment which itself can easily represent the average of 23 rads per hour while shielded behind 2 g/cm2 (that's similar to 5/16" worth of 5086 of aluminum), and that dosage can easily become 10 fold worse off if it's having been one of those unusually bad solar/cosmic years, with an individual event that can last for hours on end being worth a greater dosage factor than our saturated instruments can manage to record (we're talking several thousand rads/hr). Of course our frail human DNA has certain limits as to how much of our DNA can be damaged by such radiation at any one time without your body going into auto-rejection mode, as it isn't based upon any such stinking average annual dosage, but upon the right here and now of whatever is being made available at the time and place of any given space travel or of those supposed EVA associations with that of our fully reactive and unavoidably radioactive moon, and if that's within moonsuits offering less than half the shielding benefit is obviously going to allow a greater dosage than any attenuation afforded by the 2 g/cm2 worth of aluminum. Of course, spacecrafts and moonsuits themselves are going to unavoidably represent additional reactive elements for the local, solar and cosmic gamma radiation to interact with, that'll unavoidably create those secondary/recoil contributions of the much nastier DNA killings via X-rays. Having a cash of your own banked bone marrow doesn't represent a 100% insurance plan if for example your eyes were damaged, and even at best the access to that banked bone marrow and stem-cells could be as much as 5 days away unless you've got an express form of returning yourself to Earth. I guess that's why I've elected on behalf of my LSE-CM/ISS to having the 50t/m2 or 5 kg/cm2 as the shield for the mostly basalt composite hull of the 256e6 tonne CM/ISS, as representing my primary insurance plan, especially since being continually situated in front of that nasty moon and only 60,000 km away from what has been officially recorded as representing the hottest local source of gamma and X-rays. Unfortunately we still have nothing of any science platform situated within LL-1, therefore hard-science numbers are difficult to impossible to extract or even speculate since that nearby nullification zone has been kept scientifically as taboo/nondisclosure as the moon itself. Basically, we know a whole lot more about all of those Iraqi WMD and of where Usama bin Laden is camping out than we do about LL-1. - Brad Guth Brad, as I once mentioned, the Astronauts on the Moon are not going to dance around the uranium mine in the nude. You don't do that on Alien Planets, Planetoids, and Moons. Those Astronauts will be protected by their spacesuits, by their vehicles, by their habitats, and deep underground tunnels, rooms, and quarters. They might even bring some radiation protecting Beta Lights with them too. What are Beta Lights? tomcat |
#668
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth's Credentials
tomcat wrote:
Brad, as I once mentioned, the Astronauts on the Moon are not going to dance around the uranium mine in the nude. You don't do that on Alien Planets, Planetoids, and Moons. Those Astronauts will be protected by their spacesuits, by their vehicles, by their habitats, and deep underground tunnels, rooms, and quarters. They might even bring some radiation protecting Beta Lights with them too. Those moonsuits in places represented as little as 0.5 g/cm2 worth of shielding mass, and that's much less than a tenth of an inch of aluminum, and otherwise at best being worth 1 g/cm2 or 0.156" of aluminum. That's not going to buy your DNA frail butt more than 1.5% reduction in hard-X-rays and perhaps not a 0.15% reduction in gamma. I suppose wearing a lead cup might bring their testicles into the realm of having as much a 5 g/cm2 worth of shield that's worth a good 12% reduction from hard-X-rays and perhaps worth another good 1% reduction in gamma. As I've informed you that I hadn't previously said anything that was close to 13 rads/hr, at least not as pertaining space travels external to the magnetosphere, whereas if our physically dark and nasty moon is not evolved and you've headed yourself away from our sun, it should become much less than that amount of dosage unless your butt is getting nailed by a bad solar/cosmic event, in which case it really doesn't matter how low the average dosage level is because, from a singular bad event you are either dead or soon going to become dead unless you've got one hell of a massive spacecraft protecting your frail DNA. Having an extremely well shielded cash of your sub-frozen bone marrow and a few of those spare stem-cells available might save the day, whereas otherwise don't plan upon coming home unless you're in a body-bag. I had actually said many times that the Van Allen belt environment that can offer an average of 23 rads/hr while shielded by 2g/cm2 (that's roughly 5/16" worth of 5086 aluminum) is derived from a sufficiently hard-science matter of fact, and as such is less TBI worthy than being situated on the gamma and hard-X-ray moon of ours while using that same 2 g/cm2 worth of shielding, and that's only recently become a matter of scientific fact because our moon having been recorded as being much worse off than what the well known bad parts of our Van Allen expanse has to offer. Therefore, I wouldn't expect a moonsuit dosage of anything less than 50 rads/hr if it's a relatively passive solar day, and otherwise we're talking several hundreds of rads/hr if it's a somewhat more active solar day, with a truly bad solar day offering several thousands of rads/hr that have frequently gone entirely off scale upon having saturated the various detection instruments we've got situated external to our magnetosphere's Van Allen expanse. However, if our sun goes into a nearly passive mode is also when the most lethal dosage of cosmic influx gets through. So, if you are out and about as moonsuit walking on that physically dark and nasty moon of ours, you are sort of in a no-win situation, especially getting double-IR and unavoidably gamma plus extra X-ray TBI dosage worthy by day. While on the moon, unless you're situated within a very small diameter but otherwise deep crater, you're unavoidably surrounded by at least a km radius of absolutely nasty badlands, therefore count on 3.14e6 m2 worth of whatever's locally radioactive and otherwise being unavoidably reactive to the cosmic and solar influx as being of contributing factors to the demise of your frail DNA. Since there's supposedly such a slight amount of surface atmosphere to work with, that's regardless still unfortunately capable of being nicely reactive (especially reactive if there's heavy elements such a Rn222 are available), and thereby affording hardly any measurable attenuation of whatever is coming off each and every square meter of that naked moon, whereas such each m2 doesn't actually have to represent all that much individual gamma and hard-X-ray dosage. A few local millirads/m2/hr times 3.14e6 and your DNA is going to be seriously fried from all directions, as well as from the inside out as that local and whatever influx gamma interacts with the bone and bone marrow of your own body. And, since it's of an environment that's no longer representing itself as a given point source of radiation, but that of a surrounding terrain of radioactive and otherwise unavoidably reactive badlands, as such there's nothing much you can do to save your soul, other than getting the hell out of there as soon as possible or going deep underground, because it's simply not practical much less affordable or even technically as of yet doable to deliver a necessary amount of suitable shield material to that moon of ours, that is without such an effort creating yet another delivery impact crater. Of course, if we had the efficient 'tomcat' VTOL spaceplane with it's nifty million pound payload capability, as such we could obviously go to/from that nasty sucker of a moon as often as we'd like and as quickly as perhaps managing such within 7 day round trips, spending as little as an hour on the earthshine illuminated deck where the local reactive environment is getting least impacted by the solar influx. Of course, just having to nearby orbit that nasty moon of ours in simply not going to represent a safe margin of crew and passender safety, fudge factor or that of any measurable attenuation factor from being fully exposed to that nasty lunar surface that's more than a wee bit radioactive as well as remaining unavoidably reactive for as far as that spaceplane can see, whereas we are talking about a 600 km or better radius, of at least getting nailed by 1.13e12 m2 of exposure, that which the extremely large but otherwise relatively low density spaceplane has to contend with. Thus how much shield mass and/or volume of whatever's similar to water is that of our 'tomcat' spaceplane planning upon accommodating for benefiting that of the crew and passenders, or is having a one-way ticket to ride and certain death their one and only viable option? Venus on the other hand offers whatever DNA considerably less of the nasty solar and cosmic influx as getting through to that geothermally toasty surface environment, therefore at least the likes of such lethal cosmic and solar radiation that's seriously bad for one's DNA is simply less than right here on mother Earth. - Brad Guth |
#669
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth's Credentials
Brad Guth wrote: tomcat wrote: Brad, as I once mentioned, the Astronauts on the Moon are not going to dance around the uranium mine in the nude. You don't do that on Alien Planets, Planetoids, and Moons. Those Astronauts will be protected by their spacesuits, by their vehicles, by their habitats, and deep underground tunnels, rooms, and quarters. They might even bring some radiation protecting Beta Lights with them too. Those moonsuits in places represented as little as 0.5 g/cm2 worth of shielding mass, and that's much less than a tenth of an inch of aluminum, and otherwise at best being worth 1 g/cm2 or 0.156" of aluminum. That's not going to buy your DNA frail butt more than 1.5% reduction in hard-X-rays and perhaps not a 0.15% reduction in gamma. I suppose wearing a lead cup might bring their testicles into the realm of having as much a 5 g/cm2 worth of shield that's worth a good 12% reduction from hard-X-rays and perhaps worth another good 1% reduction in gamma. As I've informed you that I hadn't previously said anything that was close to 13 rads/hr, at least not as pertaining space travels external to the magnetosphere, whereas if our physically dark and nasty moon is not evolved and you've headed yourself away from our sun, it should become much less than that amount of dosage unless your butt is getting nailed by a bad solar/cosmic event, in which case it really doesn't matter how low the average dosage level is because, from a singular bad event you are either dead or soon going to become dead unless you've got one hell of a massive spacecraft protecting your frail DNA. Having an extremely well shielded cash of your sub-frozen bone marrow and a few of those spare stem-cells available might save the day, whereas otherwise don't plan upon coming home unless you're in a body-bag. I had actually said many times that the Van Allen belt environment that can offer an average of 23 rads/hr while shielded by 2g/cm2 (that's roughly 5/16" worth of 5086 aluminum) is derived from a sufficiently hard-science matter of fact, and as such is less TBI worthy than being situated on the gamma and hard-X-ray moon of ours while using that same 2 g/cm2 worth of shielding, and that's only recently become a matter of scientific fact because our moon having been recorded as being much worse off than what the well known bad parts of our Van Allen expanse has to offer. Therefore, I wouldn't expect a moonsuit dosage of anything less than 50 rads/hr if it's a relatively passive solar day, and otherwise we're talking several hundreds of rads/hr if it's a somewhat more active solar day, with a truly bad solar day offering several thousands of rads/hr that have frequently gone entirely off scale upon having saturated the various detection instruments we've got situated external to our magnetosphere's Van Allen expanse. However, if our sun goes into a nearly passive mode is also when the most lethal dosage of cosmic influx gets through. So, if you are out and about as moonsuit walking on that physically dark and nasty moon of ours, you are sort of in a no-win situation, especially getting double-IR and unavoidably gamma plus extra X-ray TBI dosage worthy by day. While on the moon, unless you're situated within a very small diameter but otherwise deep crater, you're unavoidably surrounded by at least a km radius of absolutely nasty badlands, therefore count on 3.14e6 m2 worth of whatever's locally radioactive and otherwise being unavoidably reactive to the cosmic and solar influx as being of contributing factors to the demise of your frail DNA. Since there's supposedly such a slight amount of surface atmosphere to work with, that's regardless still unfortunately capable of being nicely reactive (especially reactive if there's heavy elements such a Rn222 are available), and thereby affording hardly any measurable attenuation of whatever is coming off each and every square meter of that naked moon, whereas such each m2 doesn't actually have to represent all that much individual gamma and hard-X-ray dosage. A few local millirads/m2/hr times 3.14e6 and your DNA is going to be seriously fried from all directions, as well as from the inside out as that local and whatever influx gamma interacts with the bone and bone marrow of your own body. And, since it's of an environment that's no longer representing itself as a given point source of radiation, but that of a surrounding terrain of radioactive and otherwise unavoidably reactive badlands, as such there's nothing much you can do to save your soul, other than getting the hell out of there as soon as possible or going deep underground, because it's simply not practical much less affordable or even technically as of yet doable to deliver a necessary amount of suitable shield material to that moon of ours, that is without such an effort creating yet another delivery impact crater. Of course, if we had the efficient 'tomcat' VTOL spaceplane with it's nifty million pound payload capability, as such we could obviously go to/from that nasty sucker of a moon as often as we'd like and as quickly as perhaps managing such within 7 day round trips, spending as little as an hour on the earthshine illuminated deck where the local reactive environment is getting least impacted by the solar influx. Of course, just having to nearby orbit that nasty moon of ours in simply not going to represent a safe margin of crew and passender safety, fudge factor or that of any measurable attenuation factor from being fully exposed to that nasty lunar surface that's more than a wee bit radioactive as well as remaining unavoidably reactive for as far as that spaceplane can see, whereas we are talking about a 600 km or better radius, of at least getting nailed by 1.13e12 m2 of exposure, that which the extremely large but otherwise relatively low density spaceplane has to contend with. Thus how much shield mass and/or volume of whatever's similar to water is that of our 'tomcat' spaceplane planning upon accommodating for benefiting that of the crew and passenders, or is having a one-way ticket to ride and certain death their one and only viable option? Venus on the other hand offers whatever DNA considerably less of the nasty solar and cosmic influx as getting through to that geothermally toasty surface environment, therefore at least the likes of such lethal cosmic and solar radiation that's seriously bad for one's DNA is simply less than right here on mother Earth. - Brad Guth I really think NASA got hold of some top notch, and probably classified, radiation blocking material(s) which they used but told no one about. The Apollo Program had America's highest priority. That would get the 'stuff' from the Army or wherever. We now know about polyethelene. The Army has a derivative that is even better. How long they have had it is unknown -- possibily decades. And, I am still curious about those 13 rad/hr panels and radiation blocking Beta Lights. tomcat |
#670
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth's Credentials
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Robert Juliano | Policy | 715 | July 15th 06 02:28 AM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Robert Juliano | Policy | 0 | February 19th 06 10:01 PM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Robert Juliano | History | 0 | February 19th 06 10:01 PM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | AM | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | February 19th 06 02:26 AM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Robert Juliano | History | 8 | February 9th 06 12:49 AM |