|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
Fred J McCall wrote:
Cite? I'm calling bull****. You *are* bull****. So GLOBAL warming is local to where you live? Global warming has local effects, and they widely vary. But global warming deniers don't understand that, so don't bother. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
Rob wrote:
Fred J McCall wrote: Cite? I'm calling bull****. You *are* bull****. So no cite, then. As expected. Claim fails. So GLOBAL warming is local to where you live? Global warming has local effects, and they widely vary. But global warming deniers don't understand that, so don't bother. In other words, the usual GCC bull**** that EVERYTHING is evidence of GCC unless they say it isn't. -- "False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil." -- Socrates |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
Le 01/09/2017 Ã* 03:11, Fred J. McCall a écritÂ*:
jacob navia wrote: I said: Are they condemmed to die of thirst and hunger or what? You said: Your ignorance doesn't kill anyone, fortunately. I know, my ignorance is immense. But please see this news on CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/31/us...ons/index.html Woman stranded in roof with no water or food. So nothing about there not being food and water distribution, then. Of course nothing. That woman is nothing. She is black and poor. Why save her? Too expensive. Just let her die. That was what republican G.W. Bush thought and 2 000 people, mostly poor, died in New Orleans. There were 2 000 casualties for half a million people, we have now 11 million people, just extrapolating it could be a catastrophe. But since most of the future victims are latinos or black, no republican government will care about that. As the general said, it is months later, when nobody speaks about it any more, that their bodies will be discovered. But they are dying NOW, and everybody remains silent, as if nothing important happens. There is no global warming, just a hoax. And no, of course hurricanes aren't stronger now even if the laws of physics tell us otherwise. ANd the victims? Just let them die. No emergency measures, no massive help for all those millions of people, just let them figure out how to live for days and days without food or water. Trump's America is great again. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
Fred J McCall wrote:
Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: Cite? I'm calling bull****. You *are* bull****. So no cite, then. As expected. Claim fails. No, I simply won't spend time on collecting that info in a discussion with a denier because I know it is a waste of time. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
jacob navia wrote:
Le 01/09/2017 à 03:11, Fred J. McCall a écrit*: jacob navia wrote: I said: Are they condemmed to die of thirst and hunger or what? You said: Your ignorance doesn't kill anyone, fortunately. I know, my ignorance is immense. But please see this news on CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/31/us...ons/index.html Woman stranded in roof with no water or food. So nothing about there not being food and water distribution, then. Of course nothing. That woman is nothing. She is black and poor. Why save her? Too expensive. Just let her die. And yet apparently she was saved. It's a big disaster with lots of people at risk. Complaining that you didn't get 24 hour service is just rather silly. That was what republican G.W. Bush thought and 2 000 people, mostly poor, died in New Orleans. You're a lying ****wit. There were 2 000 casualties for half a million people, we have now 11 million people, just extrapolating it could be a catastrophe. But since most of the future victims are latinos or black, no republican government will care about that. I repeat. You're a lying ****wit. snip ****wit raving -- "You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear." -- Mark Twain |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
Rob wrote:
Fred J McCall wrote: Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: Cite? I'm calling bull****. You *are* bull****. So no cite, then. As expected. Claim fails. No, I simply won't spend time on collecting that info in a discussion with a denier because I know it is a waste of time. I repeat. So no cite, then. As expected. Claim fails. -- "False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil." -- Socrates |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
On Aug/31/2017 at 9:13 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote :
Alain Fournier wrote: On Aug/31/2017 at 1:24 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote : Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: OK, you're adamantly ignorant. Your choice. Again, given global warming, why do we not have constantly increasing storm power and frequency (because we don't, you know)? Because global warming only means the AVERAGE temperature is going up. The ACTUAL temperature, both locally and globally, varies around that average and is not higher everywhere and always. Everyone except Donald and you understands that. In other words, like all GCC True Believers, the evidence only matters when you say it does. If the AVERAGE temperature is going up, the AVERAGE storm should be more severe and the AVERAGE number should be going up. Why are neither of those two things true? But they ARE true! Hogwash! You are entitled to your own opinion but you are NOT entitled to your own data. https://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/top10.asp Did you actually look at the site you cited? Seasons with the most named storms, 1851 - Present 11 of 15 years given, or 73%, are in the past 25 years. By random this should be about 15%. Seasons with the most hurricanes, 1851 - Present 5 out of 10 given, or 50%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. Seasons with the most major hurricanes, 1851 - Present 3 out of 8 given, or 38%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. Seasons with the highest Accumulated Cyclone Energy, 1851 - Present 4 out of 10 given, or 40%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. That's all the info given on that site. All of it showing that we now having more severe weather than in the past. But it is not, as it should be if GCC is true and only water temperature matters, monotonically increasing. What are you talking about? I don't think I have ever seen anyone anywhere claim that global warming is monotonic, nor anyone saying only water temperature matters. There really no reason whatsoever to think that hurricanes should increase monotonically. Alain Fournier |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
Alain Fournier wrote:
On Aug/31/2017 at 9:13 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote : Alain Fournier wrote: On Aug/31/2017 at 1:24 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote : Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: OK, you're adamantly ignorant. Your choice. Again, given global warming, why do we not have constantly increasing storm power and frequency (because we don't, you know)? Because global warming only means the AVERAGE temperature is going up. The ACTUAL temperature, both locally and globally, varies around that average and is not higher everywhere and always. Everyone except Donald and you understands that. In other words, like all GCC True Believers, the evidence only matters when you say it does. If the AVERAGE temperature is going up, the AVERAGE storm should be more severe and the AVERAGE number should be going up. Why are neither of those two things true? But they ARE true! Hogwash! You are entitled to your own opinion but you are NOT entitled to your own data. https://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/top10.asp Did you actually look at the site you cited? Seasons with the most named storms, 1851 - Present 11 of 15 years given, or 73%, are in the past 25 years. By random this should be about 15%. Seasons with the most hurricanes, 1851 - Present 5 out of 10 given, or 50%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. Seasons with the most major hurricanes, 1851 - Present 3 out of 8 given, or 38%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. Seasons with the highest Accumulated Cyclone Energy, 1851 - Present 4 out of 10 given, or 40%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. That's all the info given on that site. All of it showing that we now having more severe weather than in the past. But it is not, as it should be if GCC is true and only water temperature matters, monotonically increasing. What are you talking about? I don't think I have ever seen anyone anywhere claim that global warming is monotonic, nor anyone saying only water temperature matters. There really no reason whatsoever to think that hurricanes should increase monotonically. Then you should pay closer attention because the contention that frequency and severity of storms correlates only to water temperature is what I've been arguing against right along. Perhaps you should understand the positions being taken before you mix in? -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
Le Sep/1/2017 à 11:19 PM, Fred J. McCall a écrit :
Alain Fournier wrote: On Aug/31/2017 at 9:13 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote : Alain Fournier wrote: On Aug/31/2017 at 1:24 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote : Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: OK, you're adamantly ignorant. Your choice. Again, given global warming, why do we not have constantly increasing storm power and frequency (because we don't, you know)? Because global warming only means the AVERAGE temperature is going up. The ACTUAL temperature, both locally and globally, varies around that average and is not higher everywhere and always. Everyone except Donald and you understands that. In other words, like all GCC True Believers, the evidence only matters when you say it does. If the AVERAGE temperature is going up, the AVERAGE storm should be more severe and the AVERAGE number should be going up. Why are neither of those two things true? But they ARE true! Hogwash! You are entitled to your own opinion but you are NOT entitled to your own data. https://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/top10.asp Did you actually look at the site you cited? Seasons with the most named storms, 1851 - Present 11 of 15 years given, or 73%, are in the past 25 years. By random this should be about 15%. Seasons with the most hurricanes, 1851 - Present 5 out of 10 given, or 50%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. Seasons with the most major hurricanes, 1851 - Present 3 out of 8 given, or 38%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. Seasons with the highest Accumulated Cyclone Energy, 1851 - Present 4 out of 10 given, or 40%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. That's all the info given on that site. All of it showing that we now having more severe weather than in the past. But it is not, as it should be if GCC is true and only water temperature matters, monotonically increasing. What are you talking about? I don't think I have ever seen anyone anywhere claim that global warming is monotonic, nor anyone saying only water temperature matters. There really no reason whatsoever to think that hurricanes should increase monotonically. Then you should pay closer attention because the contention that frequency and severity of storms correlates only to water temperature is what I've been arguing against right along. Perhaps you should understand the positions being taken before you mix in? Care to show who and when someone said that frequency and severity of storms correlates *only* to water temperature? JF Mezei said on Aug 30 at 1:25 AM, that "So warmer oceans will result in more frequent extreme weather events." He didn't say that there are no other causes for extreme weather or that the increase of frequency in extreme weather events will be monotonic. You pulled that out, because you needed a straw man. Alain Fournier |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Houston Houston, do you hear me?
Alain Fournier wrote:
Le Sep/1/2017 à 11:19 PM, Fred J. McCall a écrit : Alain Fournier wrote: On Aug/31/2017 at 9:13 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote : Alain Fournier wrote: On Aug/31/2017 at 1:24 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote : Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: Rob wrote: Fred J McCall wrote: OK, you're adamantly ignorant. Your choice. Again, given global warming, why do we not have constantly increasing storm power and frequency (because we don't, you know)? Because global warming only means the AVERAGE temperature is going up. The ACTUAL temperature, both locally and globally, varies around that average and is not higher everywhere and always. Everyone except Donald and you understands that. In other words, like all GCC True Believers, the evidence only matters when you say it does. If the AVERAGE temperature is going up, the AVERAGE storm should be more severe and the AVERAGE number should be going up. Why are neither of those two things true? But they ARE true! Hogwash! You are entitled to your own opinion but you are NOT entitled to your own data. https://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/top10.asp Did you actually look at the site you cited? Seasons with the most named storms, 1851 - Present 11 of 15 years given, or 73%, are in the past 25 years. By random this should be about 15%. Seasons with the most hurricanes, 1851 - Present 5 out of 10 given, or 50%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. Seasons with the most major hurricanes, 1851 - Present 3 out of 8 given, or 38%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. Seasons with the highest Accumulated Cyclone Energy, 1851 - Present 4 out of 10 given, or 40%, are in the past 25 years. By random, this should be about 15%. That's all the info given on that site. All of it showing that we now having more severe weather than in the past. But it is not, as it should be if GCC is true and only water temperature matters, monotonically increasing. What are you talking about? I don't think I have ever seen anyone anywhere claim that global warming is monotonic, nor anyone saying only water temperature matters. There really no reason whatsoever to think that hurricanes should increase monotonically. Then you should pay closer attention because the contention that frequency and severity of storms correlates only to water temperature is what I've been arguing against right along. Perhaps you should understand the positions being taken before you mix in? Care to show who and when someone said that frequency and severity of storms correlates *only* to water temperature? JF Mezei said on Aug 30 at 1:25 AM, that "So warmer oceans will result in more frequent extreme weather events." He didn't say that there are no other causes for extreme weather or that the increase of frequency in extreme weather events will be monotonic. You pulled that out, because you needed a straw man. No, I don't care to show you. I'm disinclined to go wading back through the thread just because you failed to pay attention. Go read Rob's ****e, you lying ****wit, and stop molesting your straw man. -- "You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear." -- Mark Twain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIAA Houston | Al | Space Station | 0 | October 31st 07 07:27 PM |
Houston, You Have a Problem | Danny Deger | Space Shuttle | 101 | July 25th 07 12:07 AM |
Houston, You Have a Problem | Danny Deger | Space Shuttle | 9 | July 21st 07 02:42 AM |
Houston, You Have a Problem | Danny Deger | Space Station | 9 | July 21st 07 02:42 AM |
"Houston, we've got a problem" | jjustwwondering | Policy | 0 | March 7th 04 08:38 AM |