Carbon dioxide levels surpass 400ppm

On Sat, 9 May 2015 07:27:55 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

The credibility of the knowledge is what matters, not the credibility
of any individual.

And you lack credibility.

It doesn't matter if you believe that. The evidence for my position
remains real. If you dismiss the evidence because you don't like my
views, you are simply being a fool.

On Sat, 09 May 2015 08:41:01 -0600, Chris L Peterson
wrote this crap:

On Sat, 9 May 2015 07:27:55 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

The credibility of the knowledge is what matters, not the credibility
of any individual.

And you lack credibility.

It doesn't matter if you believe that. The evidence for my position
remains real. If you dismiss the evidence because you don't like my
views, you are simply being a fool.

What evidence?


Vote for Carson
Repeal the nightmares

On Friday, May 8, 2015 at 1:23:29 PM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:
(like claiming that if Einstein believed in unicorns, they
are likely to be real).

It's true that there is no record of Einstein believing in unicorns.

However, it is said that the *ultimate* authority - at least if you live in
North Korea - believed that there were unicorns around the sacred Mount Paektu!

Oh, wait, a Google tells me that this was a mistake due to a mistranslation of
the word "Kiringul".

John Savard

On Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 8:46:25 AM UTC-7, Lord Vath wrote:

What evidence?

Start here, for example...

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

On Friday, 8 May 2015 20:00:19 UTC+2, palsing wrote:
Chris, I wish I was capable of writing like this, you have outdone yourself with this Epistle. I will probably plagiarize some of your statements now and then, apologies in advance, but they are just too good not to share.

\Paul A

Thank you for your kind words, Paul. Praise on s.a.a is a rare thing indeed..

My post was composed "live" so badly needs editing. Sadly the fine art of précis has always evaded me by several AU.

Writing in proper paragraphs in Google Groups makes no sense at all. When I break the text down into reasonable paragraphs it always displays as long, silly stripes of text which have more in common with sheet music! ;-]

On Sat, 09 May 2015 11:46:27 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote:

It doesn't matter if you believe that. The evidence for my position
remains real. If you dismiss the evidence because you don't like my
views, you are simply being a fool.

What evidence?

The burden is on you to educate yourself. Demanding evidence for
anything that is broadly accepted is unreasonable (outside a genuine
interest in being educated... and that pretty clearly does not
describe you). It makes you look as silly as demanding evidence for
evolution or for laws of gravitation.

On Sat, 9 May 2015 09:59:52 -0700 (PDT), palsing
wrote this crap:

On Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 8:46:25 AM UTC-7, Lord Vath wrote:

What evidence?

Start here, for example...

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

It's old news that the Earth is warming. 12,000 years old. But
there's no evidence that humans are causing it.


Vote for Carson
Repeal the nightmares

On Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 1:27:13 PM UTC-6, Lord Vath wrote:

It's old news that the Earth is warming. 12,000 years old. But
there's no evidence that humans are causing it.

There's very strong evidence for that, but it is merely circumstantial. Carbon
dioxide could cause a greenhouse event... and human industry has been burning a
lot of fossil fuels, causing a net input of carbon dioxide.

John Savard

On 5/7/15 12:09 AM, RichA wrote:
They just dug up an ice core that reportedly shows 18 major climate changes in the last 80 million years.
Don't lie. It makes you a poltroon.

On Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 5:14:04 PM UTC-7, lal_truckee wrote:
On 5/7/15 12:09 AM, RichA wrote:
They just dug up an ice core that reportedly shows 18 major climate changes in the last 80 million years.

Don't lie. It makes you a poltroon.

You have a reference link for this?