|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mercury has never been orbited by a spacecraft before. That willchange this month
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN MAGAZINE: Journey to the Innermost Planet
Mercury has never been orbited by a spacecraft before. That will change this month http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...AT_BS_20110225 On March 18 MESSENGER finally enters into orbit around Mercury and begins a one-year orbital mission. Just getting there has been hard, given the planet’s high orbital speed and proximity to the sun. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Mercury has never been orbited by a spacecraft before. That willchange this month
On Feb 25, 6:03*pm, Sam Wormley quoted, in part:
Just getting there has been hard, given the planet s high orbital speed and proximity to the sun. Even Scientific American gets the science wrong sometimes. The planet's proximity to the Sun certainly made it hard to get there. Had a spaceship been sent there by a straightforward Hohmann orbit, a large delta-V would have been required. Instead, to save on fuel, complicated gravity assists were used. And, of course, its proximity to the Sun also makes it hard to keep the probe in working order. However, Mercury's high orbital speed makes it easier to send a spaceship there - and it would have been easier still if Mercury's orbital speed was higher. To see why, as an oversimplification, let's suppose that after a gravity assist from Venus, the probe was travelling to Mercury in a Hohmann orbit for a Venus to Mercury trip. (In real life, it might have been going faster than that. But then it slowed down with further gravity assists from Mercury itself.) This would mean that when it encountered Mercury, it would have been travelling around the Sun *faster* than Mercury was, as its orbit would have taken it back out to the orbit of Venus again. So the fact that Mercury is moving swiftly around the Sun isn't making it harder to get there, rather, it's the fact that it isn't moving swiftly *enough*. John Savard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mercury has never been orbited by a spacecraft before. That willchange this month
John Savard wrote:
So the fact that Mercury is moving swiftly around the Sun isn't making it harder to get there, rather, it's the fact that it isn't moving swiftly *enough*. Perhaps--but if it *were* travelling that fast, its orbit would be close to Venus's (possibly even extending beyond it, if eccentric enough) and probably unstable as a result. I'm not sure you can explain just why it's tricky to position the satellite in orbit (around any planet, really) without spending quite some time explaining basic things about orbits and conservation of energy. -- Brian Tung (posting from Google Groups) The Astronomy Corner at http://www.astronomycorner.net/ Unofficial C5+ Page at http://www.astronomycorner.net/c5plus/ My PleiadAtlas Page at http://www.astronomycorner.net/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ at http://www.astronomycorner.net/reference/faq.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mercury spacecraft cooling question | Pat Flannery | History | 17 | July 12th 08 08:45 PM |
REQ: Any download sources for 3DS or LWO meshes for Gemini, Mercury and Soyuz spacecraft | OM | History | 4 | November 3rd 05 02:14 PM |
Curious about Mercury Spacecraft Assignments | Ami Silberman | History | 1 | December 1st 04 04:28 AM |
What if MIR hadnt been de orbited? | Hallerb | History | 134 | March 4th 04 08:20 PM |
Strela Orbited Something | ed kyle | Policy | 5 | December 11th 03 11:13 PM |