A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Boeing 747 Laser



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old June 22nd 06, 07:29 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 Laser

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:43:48 -0500, Pat Flannery
wrote:



D. Scott Ferrin wrote:


Depends. Some parts of China would be 3000 miles away and Japan's 1st
nukes wouldn't necessarily be W-88s right out of the box even with
their technology base.



Yeah, right.
The Chinese would be expecting them to attack with boosted fission warheads.
They wouldn't be expecting anything else regarding Japan's abrogation of
the development of "nuclear weapons" in regards to bombs.
Except for of course NUCLEAR HEAT CANNONS bounced off the ionosphere!
Remember how we didn't see the coming German rocket threat when the
Treaty Of Versailles was negotiated in 1918?
Big battleships out; big artillery out.
Not a mention of big rockets being out.
THEY CAN FIGHT MOTHRA AND THE MYSTERIANS; THEY CAN FIGHT BEIJING! ;-)

Pat


I always wanted to know "hey, how come we do have those mobile
lightning cannons?" And how did they aim those by the way?

  #22  
Old June 22nd 06, 07:46 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 Laser


"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
...


D. Scott Ferrin wrote:


Depends. Some parts of China would be 3000 miles away and Japan's 1st
nukes wouldn't necessarily be W-88s right out of the box even with
their technology base.


Yeah, right.
The Chinese would be expecting them to attack with boosted fission
warheads.


For the purposes of scientific research only, of course.


  #23  
Old June 22nd 06, 09:25 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 Laser



Neil Gerace wrote:

Yeah, right.
The Chinese would be expecting them to attack with boosted fission
warheads.



For the purposes of scientific research only, of course.



Or honor...like the Mysterians said: "We are pacifists.. to the last."
http://www.tohokingdom.com/web_pages...s_sdf_misc.htm
Filthy, Japanese women-stealing swine!
We full well know what THEIR agenda is!

Pat
  #24  
Old June 22nd 06, 10:02 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 Laser



Neil Gerace wrote:

HIT THESE RADIATION-MUTATED COCKHOUNDS FROM BEYOND THE STARS WITH THE
FULL POWER OF THE EARTH FORCES! LET NEVER A RADITION-TAINTED PENIS COME
NEAR THE PURE VAGINA OF ANY WOMAN OF JAPAN!
Sorry, but the concept of this really torques me off severely.
YOU BURN THEIR DEGENERATE STRONTIUM 90 MUTATED BALLS OFF WITH A
GOD-DAMNED MARKALITE!
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THE DESERVE!!!

Pat
  #25  
Old June 22nd 06, 10:28 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 Laser



Pat Flannery wrote:


THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THE DESERVE!!!



That's "THEY" BTW.
And don't even get me started on those despicable Xillians...
It'll begin with the subversion of the Japanese government...
It'll end with not one sixteen-year-old Japanese girl not crying...and
walking...long...sore...and RAVISHED...to her school!
GOJIRA! Where are you now? ...when Japan needs you?!

Pat
  #26  
Old June 22nd 06, 11:58 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 Laser

Pat Flannery wrote:

Speaking of missile tests disguised as satellite launches, I found this
very interesting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-5_rocket
What exactly would Japan need a MX clone for?
It's most likely military opponent is either China or North Korea, and
neither of those are far enough away to require the sort of range this
three-stage rocket would have in a ICBM role.
We, on the other hand, are that far away.
Are they getting edgy about U.S. interference in their oil supply again,
like happened in 1941?


Japan has or had two separate space agencies, one for business
(liquid-fueled H-2A rocket), another for science (solid rocket), and
apparently for the latter they wanted a cheap rocket.

Japan actually likes the U.S. a lot, contrary to what a certain crazy
fascist ex-mayor of Tokyo wrote decades ago in a book about Japan being
#1. On the other hand, they still hate China, and once when the
Japanese defense ministry was asked how long it would take Japan to
build a nuclear weapon, they answered "91 days," as if a schedule had
already been written up. Apparently their nuclear industry is
configured to produce at least 2,000 warheads within a year.

  #27  
Old June 22nd 06, 12:33 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 Laser

EricT wrote:
Any one know where the laser toting 747 is now? If the plan is to
shoot the North Korean missile down, would we do it with a laser? If we
miss the missile with the ABM interceptors it would be an embarrassment, but
if we miss it with the Boeing (Deathstar) 747 know one would ever know we
tried.

I assume that the North Koreans are not stupid enough to throw it in
our direction, so I don't know how the ABMs are supposed to intercept it
anyway. Is there a chance, assuming our ABM system actually works, of
intercepting the NK missile in a trajectory not aimed at the US westcoast,
or is this a fantasy of the Newsmedia?


Why don't we just drop a nuke on the launcher?


--
Two ways to improve your life.
1. Turn off the TV.
2. Throw it out the window.

Vlad the Impaler
  #28  
Old June 22nd 06, 01:59 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 Laser

Vlad wrote:
EricT wrote:
Why don't we just drop a nuke on the launcher?



I think that is the best way to stop it, but I think it should be a
"Launch pad mistake resulting in an explosion."

Then we could say; "No, all of our B2's are accounted for, it
wasn't us." (Grin)

The reason for many small launch pad fueling tanks is because that
cannot build larger ones and I think they are using 5 gal. cans to fuel
it rather than 5 gallon buckets.

  #29  
Old June 22nd 06, 02:01 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 Laser


But not a nuke, 2 500 pound bombs would be fine.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scientists See Better, Fainter with New Keck Laser Guide Star (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 January 10th 06 09:52 PM
Scientists See Better, Fainter with New Keck Laser Guide Star(Forwarded) Andrew Yee News 0 January 10th 06 09:24 PM
Boeing Sells Rocketdyne Ed Kyle Policy 10 February 28th 05 03:46 PM
More on Green Laser Concerns.... Ted Nichols II Amateur Astronomy 8 January 5th 05 06:06 PM
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are william mook Policy 157 November 19th 03 12:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.