A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More ET foam woes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old December 13th 05, 01:49 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default More ET foam woes


"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message
...

:Nope..None planned nor even theorised except rotation. Something
:documented by the russians almost a century ago.

The Russians had rotating space stations under the Tsars?



yep, great big flywheels powered by the sweat of a thousand serfs running
around and around. One of the first things the Menshiviks did away with,
that.


  #62  
Old December 13th 05, 02:42 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default More ET foam woes



Terrell Miller wrote:

yep, great big flywheels powered by the sweat of a thousand serfs running
around and around. One of the first things the Menshiviks did away with,
that.



Comrade! Czarist super tank!: http://www.gnrtr.com/solutions/en/s102.html
Foolishness of Romanovs again revealed!
The New Soviet Man knows super tank should look like this:
http://www.wwiivehicles.com/ussr/tanks_heavy/t35.html

Pat
  #63  
Old December 13th 05, 03:21 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default More ET foam woes


"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
...


Terrell Miller wrote:

yep, great big flywheels powered by the sweat of a thousand serfs running
around and around. One of the first things the Menshiviks did away with,
that.


Comrade! Czarist super tank!: http://www.gnrtr.com/solutions/en/s102.html
Foolishness of Romanovs again revealed!
The New Soviet Man knows super tank should look like this:
http://www.wwiivehicles.com/ussr/tanks_heavy/t35.html

Pat

Ah, the T35. What a useless vehicle. For all its appearance, it was actually
relatively lightly armored. For some reason, most Soviet "Infantry" tanks of
the pre-war through early war period were slow, heavy, but terribly
under-armored, at least compared to, say, the Mattilda. The only ones which
were decently (even heavily) armored were the KV-1 and KV-2.


  #64  
Old December 13th 05, 04:46 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default station woes (was More ET foam woes)

In article ,
Derek Lyons wrote:
As it was, the US Lab Module ended
up launching with an interim-kludge version of its software...

But surely the nice thing about software is that you can update it...


In the past Henry has categorized this as a feature, rather than as a
bug as he does here.


Read more carefully, Derek. :-) Being able to update after launch is good,
yes. But there's also something to be said for having at least the basic
functions of the software *working* at launch time, especially when they
play a role in basic vehicle control (as the Lab Module software did) for
a vehicle that isn't tolerant of loss of control.

Especially when another partner's financial woes have conveniently given
you an extra year or two to get the software done.
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. |
  #65  
Old January 2nd 06, 04:28 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default More ET foam woes


"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in
message .com...
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 20:02:42 -0600, tobarn wrote
(in article .com):
3) Determining effectiveness of remedies to the negative effects of
zero-G.


Nope..None planned nor even theorised except rotation. Something
documented by the russians almost a century ago.


Bull**** - there's a lot more to counter-acting micro-g environments
than centrifuges. Exercise, isometric muscle condition, medication,
nutritional supplements, etc.


R. Talsorian Games- Deep Space supplement for Cyberpunk 2020. I covered this
in a reasonably thorough manner (for role-playing purposes) in 1993. Herb,
Pootiehead there is just plain wrong.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'04 Report Faulted Application of Shuttle Foam: NY* Article Laughable! Amateur Astronomy 0 August 5th 05 08:52 AM
That Interesting Foam Situation Cardman Policy 5 July 29th 05 09:24 PM
STS-87 Foam Impact Assessment (reposted) Stuf4 Policy 8 September 29th 03 02:23 PM
STS-87 Foam Impact Assessment (reposted) Stuf4 History 8 September 29th 03 02:23 PM
NASA Team Believed Foam Could Not Damage Space Shuttle Scott M. Kozel Space Shuttle 9 July 25th 03 08:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.