#61
|
|||
|
|||
More ET foam woes
"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message ... :Nope..None planned nor even theorised except rotation. Something :documented by the russians almost a century ago. The Russians had rotating space stations under the Tsars? yep, great big flywheels powered by the sweat of a thousand serfs running around and around. One of the first things the Menshiviks did away with, that. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
More ET foam woes
Terrell Miller wrote: yep, great big flywheels powered by the sweat of a thousand serfs running around and around. One of the first things the Menshiviks did away with, that. Comrade! Czarist super tank!: http://www.gnrtr.com/solutions/en/s102.html Foolishness of Romanovs again revealed! The New Soviet Man knows super tank should look like this: http://www.wwiivehicles.com/ussr/tanks_heavy/t35.html Pat |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
More ET foam woes
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Terrell Miller wrote: yep, great big flywheels powered by the sweat of a thousand serfs running around and around. One of the first things the Menshiviks did away with, that. Comrade! Czarist super tank!: http://www.gnrtr.com/solutions/en/s102.html Foolishness of Romanovs again revealed! The New Soviet Man knows super tank should look like this: http://www.wwiivehicles.com/ussr/tanks_heavy/t35.html Pat Ah, the T35. What a useless vehicle. For all its appearance, it was actually relatively lightly armored. For some reason, most Soviet "Infantry" tanks of the pre-war through early war period were slow, heavy, but terribly under-armored, at least compared to, say, the Mattilda. The only ones which were decently (even heavily) armored were the KV-1 and KV-2. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
station woes (was More ET foam woes)
In article ,
Derek Lyons wrote: As it was, the US Lab Module ended up launching with an interim-kludge version of its software... But surely the nice thing about software is that you can update it... In the past Henry has categorized this as a feature, rather than as a bug as he does here. Read more carefully, Derek. :-) Being able to update after launch is good, yes. But there's also something to be said for having at least the basic functions of the software *working* at launch time, especially when they play a role in basic vehicle control (as the Lab Module software did) for a vehicle that isn't tolerant of loss of control. Especially when another partner's financial woes have conveniently given you an extra year or two to get the software done. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
More ET foam woes
"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message .com... On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 20:02:42 -0600, tobarn wrote (in article .com): 3) Determining effectiveness of remedies to the negative effects of zero-G. Nope..None planned nor even theorised except rotation. Something documented by the russians almost a century ago. Bull**** - there's a lot more to counter-acting micro-g environments than centrifuges. Exercise, isometric muscle condition, medication, nutritional supplements, etc. R. Talsorian Games- Deep Space supplement for Cyberpunk 2020. I covered this in a reasonably thorough manner (for role-playing purposes) in 1993. Herb, Pootiehead there is just plain wrong. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'04 Report Faulted Application of Shuttle Foam: NY* Article | Laughable! | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 5th 05 08:52 AM |
That Interesting Foam Situation | Cardman | Policy | 5 | July 29th 05 09:24 PM |
STS-87 Foam Impact Assessment (reposted) | Stuf4 | Policy | 8 | September 29th 03 02:23 PM |
STS-87 Foam Impact Assessment (reposted) | Stuf4 | History | 8 | September 29th 03 02:23 PM |
NASA Team Believed Foam Could Not Damage Space Shuttle | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 9 | July 25th 03 08:33 AM |