|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What might a real Hitch Hiker's Guide entry say?
Peter Munn wrote:
What might another culture see as significant about Earth, summing us up in a short entry that might equate to, say, just 50 English words? Clearly, there can be no single "right" answer. Here's my shot for a publication aimed at the scientifically-minded galactic tourist... Probably something along the lines of what Carl Sagan wrote in _Cosmos_ for the hypothetical entry for Earth in the Encyclopaedia Galactica. -- __ Erik Max Francis && && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ / \ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis \__/ Do you like what you see / Do you like yourself -- Neneh Cherry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Munn wrote:
[snip] What might another culture see as significant about Earth, summing us up in a short entry that might equate to, say, just 50 English words? Clearly, there can be no single "right" answer. The answer to this question is dependant upon the preconceptions, biases and experience of these extra-terrestrial readers. Therefore I believe that before we can answer this question we must decide upon the range of environments and cultures possible for the potential encyclopaeia-buying populous our universe. Without knowledge of out target market to enable use to give comparisons we can only give tedious factual information such as the diameter of the planet, proportion covered by water, the age and temperature of our local star, etc. Any answers you get without data concerning the relevant extra-terrestrials will amount to "what I, a resident, think about the Earth". An interesting question, no doubt, but one which I expect will soon get dragged down by current-day politics and prejudice. Tim -- Anyone who qualifies their comments with "just my two cents" is usually over-valuing their contribution. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Tim Auton" wrote in message
... Peter Munn wrote: [snip] What might another culture see as significant about Earth, summing us up in a short entry that might equate to, say, just 50 English words? Clearly, there can be no single "right" answer. The answer to this question is dependant upon the preconceptions, biases and experience of these extra-terrestrial readers. Therefore I believe that before we can answer this question we must decide upon the range of environments and cultures possible for the potential encyclopaeia-buying populous our universe. Without knowledge of out target market to enable use to give comparisons we can only give tedious factual information such as the diameter of the planet, proportion covered by water, the age and temperature of our local star, etc. Any answers you get without data concerning the relevant extra-terrestrials will amount to "what I, a resident, think about the Earth". An interesting question, no doubt, but one which I expect will soon get dragged down by current-day politics and prejudice. Tim Which has changed how during the last 2 million years? Grim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Munn wrote:
[...] The part about Earth's entry in the guide being expanded from one to two words is, of course, wonderful in its simple statement of how our true significance may be in the grand scheme of things. Not wanting to deny that in any way, I nevertheless started to wonder what a slightly longer item could say. The BBC actually held a competition: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/hitchhik...petition.shtml The competition has now closed, although the winners haven't been announced yet. -- Petter Hesselberg http://www.petterhesselberg.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
....'mostly cloudy'?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"GazOC" wrote in message om... ...'mostly cloudy'? with occasional rain! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Erik Max Francis wrote in message ...
Peter Munn wrote: What might another culture see as significant about Earth, summing us up in a short entry that might equate to, say, just 50 English words? Clearly, there can be no single "right" answer. Here's my shot for a publication aimed at the scientifically-minded galactic tourist... Probably something along the lines of what Carl Sagan wrote in _Cosmos_ for the hypothetical entry for Earth in the Encyclopaedia Galactica. Do you mean this - Civilization Type:1.0J. Society Code: 4G4, "Humanity". Star: G2V, r=9.844 kpc, 8=00o05'24". Planet: third, a= 1.5x1013 cm. Extraplanetary colonies: none. Planet age: 1.45x1017sec. Receipt first galactic nested code: application pending. Deoxyribonucleic acid. No genetic prosthesis. Mobile heterotrophs, symbionts with photosynthetic autotrophs. Surface dwellers, monospecific, polychromatic Oxygen breathers.Fe-chelated tetrapyroles in circulatory fluid. Sexual mammals. m= 70000gr. Technology: exponentiating/ fossil fuels/ nuclear weapons/ organized warfare/ environmental pollution. Cultu about 200 nation states, about 6 global powers; cultural and technological homogeniety underway. Probability of survival (per 100 yr): 40%. As you see, it's heavily species-centric. I suppose this is before _Star Trek IV_, and, come to think, before Hitch Hiker - or was it? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Carnegie wrote:
As you see, it's heavily species-centric. Certainly part of it isn't. If there's going to be an encyclopedia, it's pretty obvious that its contents are going to be guided by the people who made the encyclopedia. How else could it possibly be? If you want some hypothetical alien entry, then you have to decide what the aliens want and why they're making the entry in the first place. Then you can see what makes sense to put in the entry. If the goal is simply rejecting every example mentioned, well, that's a pretty easy task. I suppose this is before _Star Trek IV_, and, come to think, before Hitch Hiker - or was it? _Cosmos_ is 1980. According to Google, _Star Trek IV_ was 1986, _Hitchhiker's_ was first broadcast in 1978. Though I have no idea what _Star Trek IV_ has to do with the topic. -- __ Erik Max Francis && && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ / \ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis \__/ Eternity is very long, especially near the end. -- Woody Allen |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Munn" wrote in message ... I'd be interested to see what other suggestions might be for a 50-word alien run-down on our planet. Mostly harmless. Attractions include crop graffiti and giving the locals anal probes. Great place for teens. It is the Hitchhiker's Guide after all.... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In the two thousand and fourth year of Bob, Peter Munn's voice said the
following, in wonderful perfect quadrophonic sound with distortion levels so low as to make a man weep: This is prompted by my recently being amongst (BBC) Radio 4's audience for the latest adaptation of part of the Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy series. The part about Earth's entry in the guide being expanded from one to two words is, of course, wonderful in its simple statement of how our true significance may be in the grand scheme of things. Not wanting to deny that in any way, I nevertheless started to wonder what a slightly longer item could say. What might another culture see as significant about Earth, summing us up in a short entry that might equate to, say, just 50 English words? Clearly, there can be no single "right" answer. Here's my shot for a publication aimed at the scientifically-minded galactic tourist... "Maturing rocky planet with cool water oceans. Impressive variety of stationary life-forms harvesting radiated stellar energy and mobile life-forms reacting atmospheric oxygen with ingested life-form material. Occasional spectacular surface eclipses when large satellite barely covers the star's disk. "Its dominant social life-form recently started exploring neighbouring planets with remote-controlled machines." I'd be interested to see what other suggestions might be for a 50-word alien run-down on our planet. There was a competition at http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/hitchhikers to submit your own entry for Earth using 250-ish words (it wasn't 250 but it was a similar number). Why not have a look at that if they publish the entries? -- John Coxon "OMFG!!!! D00D!! 1 j|_|$t red thiz book, The HITchi|er's Guild or something liek that, and in it FORD is not blak!!!!! Oh, wait, you wanted a NON-aol response? my apologies." - Gaz (afdaniain) E-mail: john[dot]coxon[at]gmail[dot]com Livejournal: http://www.livejournal.com/~johncoxon DNA eBaywatch: http://www.livejournal.com/~dna_ebay Missing footnotes: http://www.nut.house.cx/cgi-bin/nemowiki.pl?ISFN ZZ9 - the official HHGG appreciation society: http://www.zz9.org/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 5th 04 01:36 AM |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |