A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Maksutov Cassegrain question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 29th 03, 04:11 PM
Roger Hamlett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Maksutov Cassegrain question


wrote in message
...
I am just getting into astronomy and have already obtained a pair of
binoculars and am learning about getting around in the night sky. I
am also interested in obtaining a telescope at some point and have
become interested in Maksutov Cassegrains. I have seen some
conflicting infromation about collimation. Do these ever need to be
collimated? What would be a good choice for a beginner?

Yes, they do need collimation.
The point is that most of the smaller examples (scopes like the ETX90), have
the assembly so well stuck together, that changes in collimation are rare,
hence it is made a 'factory' adjustment. However larger versions, will have
collimation systems of some sort.
Depends what you want to do.
For instance, _for it's size_, scopes like the ETX90, are nice little units,
especially for the price. However for the same sort of money, a
significantly larger Newtonian, can be bought, and this will outperform the
smaller Mak for just about everything. Most 'rules', about 'which scope is
best for what', end up having lots of exceptions. So the 'best' small scope,
is probably an APO refractor, _but_ the cost is such, that for the same
money, a much larger scope using simpler technology (like a Newtonian), will
be available, which will see more. Maksutov models, generally, have quite
high focal ratios, which can be considered to make them relatively 'good'
for planetary observations, but conversely, limits the field of view for
deep space objects.
There are a series of 'rules', which might be worth bearing in mind beyond
these comments:
1) Aperture rules.
2) Better a small scope that is used, than a large scope, that is stuck
indoors...
The Mak tends to 'win' over most other designs, on it's 'useability', but
you should have a look at something like a larger Dobsonian mounted
Newtonian, as the best 'value for money' larger scope design around, to see
if you could cope with something like this. You will see more.

Best Wishes


  #2  
Old July 29th 03, 05:42 PM
David Nakamoto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Maksutov Cassegrain question

They don't require frequent collimation, and often for casual observers
don't
require any out of the box, although you SHOULD check for this once you
get your scope. But once they're collimated they stay that was pretty well.

I think that they are a good beginner's scope; easy to maintain, give good
views. Be aware that you need to protect these scopes from the daytime heat
as they take sometimes an hour or more to cool down, and until they do, the
seeing is not good through them (thermal currents in the tube caused by the
heated optics).

Good Luck !
--- Dave

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Never be afraid of trying something new for the love of it.
Remember... amateurs built the Ark.
Professionals built the Titanic!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

wrote in message
...
I am just getting into astronomy and have already obtained a pair of
binoculars and am learning about getting around in the night sky. I
am also interested in obtaining a telescope at some point and have
become interested in Maksutov Cassegrains. I have seen some
conflicting infromation about collimation. Do these ever need to be
collimated? What would be a good choice for a beginner?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moon key to space future? James White Policy 90 January 6th 04 04:29 PM
Question For Craig Markwardt re Pioneer 10 Data ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 32 November 30th 03 09:47 PM
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) Lord Blacklight Astronomy Misc 56 November 21st 03 02:45 PM
No Longer Question of What But WHERE? Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 0 November 20th 03 01:04 PM
PX question Bored Huge Krill Astronomy Misc 4 August 10th 03 02:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.