|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone
As per Usenet that sucks and blows usual, I see nothing but MOS Usenet
static and lots of their racist flak and otherwise bigoted flatulence to boot. Gee whiz, I can't but wonder what their insurmountable problem is this time around. It must have been something that I and my lose cannon said, that was true! Since I normally don't intentionally post my topics into the likes of "alt.astronomy", or much of whatever's alt.anything other because, it's usually such an incest infested cesspool of the absolute worse possible *******s on Earth, thus a total waste of one's time and resources. Therefore I'm apparently missing out on all the good brown-nose and topic/author ****ology that makes the Art Deco day so much worth living for, just like the good old days when they got their Roman partners in crimes against humanity to put one of their own jewboys on a stick. - Brad Guth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone
Art Deco wrote:
Ed Otto wrote: "Art Deco" wrote in message ... Brad Guth wrote: Therefore I'm apparently missing out on all the good brown-nose and topic/author ****ology that makes the Art Deco day so much worth living *ding* This is alt.astronomy, not alt.archetecture. Please take your discussion of this period to that group. I'm sorry, my NSP does not carry alt.archetecture. Request DENIED. -- COOSN-266-06-39716 Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion", as designated by Brad Guth "And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even *call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?" -- Painsnuh the Lamer "Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on their own, and the races are related (brown)." -- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity "Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of the establishment." -- Double-A on technology development "Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of the establishment." -- Double-A on technology development Here's one hell of a new idea, that's actually true none the less: Our naked moon is existing much like a solid form of a Van Allen belt, especially since the force of it's gravity is so much greater than the wussy force of what any magnetosphere can ever hope to be, and thus lo and behold it's actually offering itself as for a whole lot more of what's being a source of gamma and hard-X-ray that's extra TBI hot and DNA lethal than of the worse of any radiation zone within our Van Allen belts has to offer, whereas a Van Allen GSO averaging 23 rads/hr while being shielded by 2 g/cm2 (5/16" of 5086 aluminum) is nothing compared to what our naked moon itself has to offer... In addition to all of that bad news for human DNA and the ruse/sting of the century, it seems that myself, Kodak and the regular laws of physics, plus multiple other hard-science that's easily replicated can prove those NASA/Apollo EVA unfiltered Kodak moments simply could not have transpired upon that physically dark and nasty moon of ours. BTW; The USSR was very much in on it, and for the very same money and power grubbing (AKA job security) reasons, just as they were very much in on the perpetrated cold-war that has only represented a combined global cost impact of a few extra trillions upon trillions for each of the past 4 decades. Now China is going to kick both of our sorry rusemaster and infomercial butts, and simply because we've done it entirely to ourselves. Way to go, alt.folks. - Brad Guth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone
Brad Guth wrote:
Once again our pagan incest cloned Art Deco and of his Third Reich collaborating Jewish brwon nose still can't contribute squat, other than "Wrong". I wonder why that is? I totally agree with our snookered and otherwise dumbfounded "tomcat" that being sufficiently underground most of the time is the only safe and sane way to fly our frail DNA onboard that physically dark and nasty gamma plus otherwise unavoidably hard-X-ray lethal moon of ours. I also agree that the required energy as to accomplish such things upon our naked moon is already up there and usable as is, especially once the LSE-CM/ISS is delivering all the terajoules you could possibly demand, and making the to/from access to the cool earthshine illuminated surface by way of an energy efficient and safe method that obviously doesn't involve unproven fly-by-rocket landers that have yet to be demonstrated. Hollow rilles and large salty geode pockets may already exist as is. Too bad we still haven't any of those nifty and moon-dirt cheap JAVELIN probes stuck into the moon for having a good 3D look-see, or those of any other interactive science instruments reporting back to Earth. It's exactly as though we've never been there or otherwise done that moon thing (don't you think!). In spite of ourselves, including those of us as pagan arrogant and as incest bigoted as Art Deco and company, whereas I honestly believe that we can actually accomplish Venus, even though there's still no such fly-by-rocket landers, not even so much as having any R&D scaled prototypes as having been documented other than in impact/crash mode, and knowing that our moon is still very much hotter than a Van Allen fart when it comes down to the available gamma and of the unavoidable hard-X-rays that'll nail our frail DNA, not to mention the unavoidable impact upon whatever Kodak film. Of course, just the horrific amounts of near-UV and UV itself has been offering more than enough spectrum skewed photon impact, that which via those unfiltered Kodak moments has more than proven that our physically dark and nasty moon (not the 55% albedo worth of their guano island as lightly dusted with portland cement and cornmeal) shouldn't have been xenon lamp spectrum illuminated. - Brad Guth As per Usenet usual, our very own jewboy Art ****o is doing his/her/their mostly Jewish damage-control thing, by way of not their sharing specific science information or of sharing in anything else that might taint their pagan gods, is only further proving that I'm right. Not only am I right about our physically DARK and gamma/X-ray lethal moon, but also I'm more right than ever about other intelligent life coexisting upon Venus. The LSE-CM/ISS is simply another matter of fact as being technically doable, and soon China will prove that I'm right about that one as well. - Brad Guth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
You're not right. You're not even "vague". You're not in the ballpark. In fact, you're not even in the park and ride to the ballpark. Obviously I am being more than sufficiently right, as otherwise you'd be the first to be sharing specific science that proves that I'm not. Of the hard-science that you claim to have, of which usually such comes along with hard-numbers, doesn't it? Since you have a cult taboo/nondisclosure policy of need-to-know, whereas you and your kind share absolutely nothing that could possibly affect your Third Reich mindset, that which only worships your NASA/Apollo pagan gods, as such you're the one and/or of the collective of brown-nosed borgs that's dead wrong. We can clearly see by way of your pathetic response that you're still unable to constructively contribute to the topic at hand, and here I'd thought you were supposedly smart. Why exactly is that? This topic is not about how impossible the LSE-CM/ISS is, but of how totally important and otherwise doable it is. The same can be said on behalf of most any of my pro intelligent life coexisting on Venus topics, whereas such they're not about the absolute negatives as being totally insurmountable as based upon your NASA koran. I happen to find the truth about our salty moon, that which may very well have once upon a time had 262 km worth of salty ice on deck that was chuck full of life as we know it, that's now a somewhat naked orb that's physically dark as coal, extremely dusty and of a downright nasty gamma and hard-X-ray environment that's a tad bit worse off than any terrestrial GSO environment, as being just as interesting as the truth is about our extremely nearby and geothermally active planet of Venus, that's actually nowhere as physically hot by the season of nighttime as by the season of day, and only much cooler yet by way of taking advantage of elevation or via good altitude that's easily doable via rigid airship, as well as the entire global situation as having been cooling itself off year by year seems rather extremely interesting. Of course you can't be biologically blind and intellectually bigoted at the same time if to fully appreciate much if any of the new and improved science that's coming through. Venus EXPRESS is alive, as is the planet, as is Guth http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...d18ff06f97bb84 Too bad you're stuck with being one of them. - Brad Guth |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
You wouldn't know truth if you bit you, k00kyb0i Fine and dandy, then tell me something/anything that I do not know about our moon, LL-1 or even about Venus. You pick whatever you've got that'll seriously impress us village idiots. - Brad Guth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone
Brad Guth wrote:
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: You wouldn't know truth if you bit you, k00kyb0i Fine and dandy, then tell me something/anything that I do not know about our moon, LL-1 or even about Venus. You pick whatever you've got that'll seriously impress us village idiots. - Brad Guth I wonder what China knows that we obviously don't? Would you folks care to speculate? - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | History | 158 | December 13th 14 09:50 PM |
Early NASA PDFs | Rusty | History | 48 | June 13th 06 05:51 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | CAPCOM | UK Astronomy | 17 | February 21st 06 01:07 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | UK Astronomy | 11 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |