|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mars solar conjunction downtime
: bob haller
: think of the mars probes lost when out of contract with earth, they : just go silent forever... OK, I'm thinking of them. Probably about one in twelve, right? Most of them go dead and are never heard from again when still in contact. Or so I expect. Did you even check before recommending an expensive solution to a non-problem? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Mars solar conjunction downtime
On Mar 22, 5:27*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote: On Mar 22, 12:08*am, (Wayne Throop) wrote: :: What's a "heliospheric orbit"? :: You just made that up, didn't you? :: And have no idea what you really mean by it, right? I googled it also, fwiw. *It's used in a few places, but incoherently. Possibly Bob picked it up from some other orbital-mechanics-challenged individual. : Jochem Huhmann : I think it's pretty clear that he means a relay in an orbit around the : sun that would allow continious communications between Earth and Mars. In which case, I conclude you need an orbit in either an earth-sun L[45] point, or an earth-mars L[45] point. *Otherwise, it's difficult to ensure that you can always send a message without expensive fuel use. *Or, naict. : Which probably isn't worth the money, especially for aging flaky : rovers. *If something's suspect of not surviving a month of not being : closely monitored it's probably hardly worth saving anymore. Yes, if that's the only application. think of the mars probes lost when out of contract with earth, they just go silent forever... Well, that is the expected end for the things. a couple robust comm sats in order could at minimum supply info when such losses occur, hopefuly prerventing *a reoccurence at a later date, while being useful other *activities It would be cheaper to just keep sending new rovers to replace the old ones. Bobbert, you have no concept at all of costs or difficulties, do you? -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar *territory." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --G. Behn There were a bunch of mars probes that on the way to the planet were never heard from again thanks to poor communication a lot of guessing had to be done in a attempt to know what went wrong, so mistakes could be prevented in the future..... the sats could be designed for ultra long life, do some science while in orbit too. it should be possible to build them for a 20 year operational life, awhile hoping they last longer |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Mars solar conjunction downtime
"bob haller" wrote in message
... There were a bunch of mars probes that on the way to the planet were never heard from again thanks to poor communication a lot of guessing had to be done in a attempt to know what went wrong, so mistakes could be prevented in the future..... There were a bunch? And we don't know what happened due to poor communication? Good, start naming them. I'll wait. Now, of that list, please explain how having your special satellite would have helped at all. Again, I'll wait. the sats could be designed for ultra long life, do some science while in orbit too. it should be possible to build them for a 20 year operational life, awhile hoping they last longer -- Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/ CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Mars solar conjunction downtime
: bob haller
: There were a bunch of mars probes that on the way to the planet were : never heard from again thanks to poor communication said poor communication, of course, having nothing to do with being obscured by the sun, or anyhthing the satellite you propose would help with. : the sats could be designed for ultra long life, do some science while : in orbit too. True, as you say just above, they could be made vastly more expensive. To you, this is a good thing? : it should be possible to build them for a 20 year operational life, : awhile hoping they last longer You know this because of your extensive engineering expertise. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Mars solar conjunction downtime
On 21/03/2013 1:35 AM, bob haller wrote:
A month long solar conjunction downtime is about to effect Curosity...... It will be out of communication for about a month, given its flakey computer we will be lucky if communications are restored after the conjunction. It has two computers, one of which has a memory problem. That computer is now functioning as a backup, with the other computer being the primary. There was an unrelated software problem the other day. that brings about the question.... how about a relay sat in heliospheric orbit so at least engineering communications can continue? other than cost are there any other issues preventing this? Any reason to think that maintaining communication would help? Sylvia. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Mars solar conjunction downtime
On Mar 22, 9:52*pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21/03/2013 1:35 AM, bob haller wrote: A month long solar conjunction downtime is about to effect Curosity...... It will be out of communication for about a month, given its flakey computer we will be lucky if communications are restored after the conjunction. It has two computers, one of which has a memory problem. That computer is now functioning as a backup, with the other computer being the primary.. There was an unrelated software problem the other day. that brings about the question.... how about a relay sat in heliospheric orbit so at least engineering communications can continue? other than cost are there any other issues preventing this? Any reason to think that maintaining communication would help? Sylvia. Well if a vehicle goes silent at mars or any other place, real time engineering data up till the point of lost contact might help regaining contact or help diagnose what went wrong, so it can be prevented in the future....... Mars lander 6 fire engines for orbital insertion, then immediately goes silent...... Without a communication link it went dead over a 3 day period With comm link it went dead right after this engine system showed a big spike on chamber pressures. Such data can be very helpful... Curositys landing time was coordinated with satellite in orbit to get a real time link back to earth of its engineering systems...... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Mars solar conjunction downtime
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:35:02 -0700 (PDT), bob haller
wrote: A month long solar conjunction downtime is about to effect Curosity...... It will be out of communication for about a month, given its flakey computer we will be lucky if communications are restored after the conjunction. that brings about the question.... how about a relay sat in heliospheric orbit so at least engineering communications can continue? other than cost are there any other issues preventing this? Need. Fortunately, orbital dynamics being what they are, we always launch from Earth to Mars when Earth and Mars are closest together (on the same side of the Sun.) So unless we're taking the scenic route, it is almost impossible to go from Earth to Mars and have a landing at a time when Mars is passing behind the Sun as seen from Earth. For example, Mars passing "behind" the Sun is eight months after Curiosity's landing. ) So communication during critical moments of landing is not and never will be a solar conjunction issue. For other times of the mission, simply having the probe go into standby works well. All of our Mars orbiters and landers have safely survived many solar conjunction communications blackouts, which happen at about the same period as Earth-Mars launch opprtunities... every 26 months, at about the half-way point between Earth-Mars launch opportunities. Really, your idea of a relay satellite, say 90 degrees ahead or behind the Earth in its orbit, is interesting. But it is premature. We probably won't want/need/be able to justify it until we have human exploration of Mars. And that will be for routine communications, not for coverage during landing or return-trip launch. Brian |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Mars solar conjunction downtime
On 23/03/2013 1:07 PM, bob haller wrote:
On Mar 22, 9:52 pm, Sylvia Else wrote: On 21/03/2013 1:35 AM, bob haller wrote: A month long solar conjunction downtime is about to effect Curosity...... It will be out of communication for about a month, given its flakey computer we will be lucky if communications are restored after the conjunction. It has two computers, one of which has a memory problem. That computer is now functioning as a backup, with the other computer being the primary. There was an unrelated software problem the other day. that brings about the question.... how about a relay sat in heliospheric orbit so at least engineering communications can continue? other than cost are there any other issues preventing this? Any reason to think that maintaining communication would help? Sylvia. Well if a vehicle goes silent at mars or any other place, real time engineering data up till the point of lost contact might help regaining contact or help diagnose what went wrong, so it can be prevented in the future....... Mars lander 6 fire engines for orbital insertion, then immediately goes silent...... Without a communication link it went dead over a 3 day period With comm link it went dead right after this engine system showed a big spike on chamber pressures. Such data can be very helpful... Curositys landing time was coordinated with satellite in orbit to get a real time link back to earth of its engineering systems...... Spacecraft are somewhat prone to sudden catastrophic failures that occur during high energy operations. With Curiosity sitting on the ground, such an event is much less likely. While one obviously not rule out a failure that kills Curiosity during the month, the much more likely scenario is that it will put itself into safe mode while trying to perform its planned science program, and will stay in that mode until the moratorium on sending commands to it ends. Curiosity will continue to send status reports, and Mars will never be eclipsed by the sun. Curiosity will also continue to send data to the MRO which will be recorded for sending later. Sylvia. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Mars solar conjunction downtime
"Brian Thorn" wrote in message
... On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:35:02 -0700 (PDT), bob haller wrote: A month long solar conjunction downtime is about to effect Curosity...... It will be out of communication for about a month, given its flakey computer we will be lucky if communications are restored after the conjunction. that brings about the question.... how about a relay sat in heliospheric orbit so at least engineering communications can continue? other than cost are there any other issues preventing this? Need. Fortunately, orbital dynamics being what they are, we always launch from Earth to Mars when Earth and Mars are closest together (on the same side of the Sun.) So unless we're taking the scenic route, it is almost impossible to go from Earth to Mars and have a landing at a time when Mars is passing behind the Sun as seen from Earth. For example, Mars passing "behind" the Sun is eight months after Curiosity's landing. ) So communication during critical moments of landing is not and never will be a solar conjunction issue. And this continues to show Bob's continued lack of understanding of orbital mechanics. Brian -- Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/ CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How close is the current Mars/moon conjunction? | Bland | Astronomy Misc | 2 | February 2nd 10 12:11 AM |
Astro: Mercury, Jupiter, Mars Conjunction Series | Edward Erbeck | Astro Pictures | 5 | December 16th 06 09:14 PM |
S@H downtime | Victor | SETI | 2 | March 3rd 05 04:28 PM |
Mesa in the background of Mars landing site coal found on Mars; CellWell1 and CellWell2 origins of the Solar System | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 14 | January 10th 04 02:13 AM |