A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Falcon 9 Heavy vs. Soviet N-1



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 9th 09, 08:52 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Falcon 9 Heavy vs. Soviet N-1

Dave U. Random wrote:
27 engines vs. 30 engines (First stage)

What are the chances of the Falcon 9 blowing up too?


I'd by concerned about that many engines generating some pretty involved
harmonic effects.


Pat
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SeaDragon and the Soviet N1 [email protected] History 0 September 1st 06 08:08 AM
Heavy H = Lots of Heavy Compounds G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 3 November 12th 05 06:12 PM
SpaceX Announces the Falcon 9 Fully Reusable Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle [email protected] News 0 September 12th 05 05:21 PM
Since Boeing and LM are partnering 50/50 and Boeing already has Delta IV Heavy does that mean we'll never see the Atlas V Heavy? D. Scott Ferrin History 5 May 6th 05 05:34 PM
Delta IV Heavy: Heavy Enough for Mars Damon Hill Policy 1 December 22nd 04 07:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.