Moon Phase and Libration, from the Other Side

On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 9:59:01 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 12:08:42 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 2:17:56 AM UTC-8, wsne... wrote:

BTW, you still owe me an apology for calling me a liar.

You owe me something first, you coward.

I owe you nothing. YOU owe me an apology. You aren't man enough to offer it.

Oh, but I am... right after you answer my question, which I asked first. But you won't, so I won't. You are too cowardly to answer, it would only prove your ignorance.

On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 1:04:19 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 9:59:01 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 12:08:42 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 2:17:56 AM UTC-8, wsne... wrote:

BTW, you still owe me an apology for calling me a liar.

You owe me something first, you coward.

I owe you nothing. YOU owe me an apology. You aren't man enough to offer it.

Oh, but I am... right after you answer my question, which I asked first. But you won't, so I won't. You are too cowardly to answer, it would only prove your ignorance.

It doesn't work that way you little child. You still owe me the apology. In the long run it is going to go easier on you if you offer it.

On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 10:11:52 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 1:04:19 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 9:59:01 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 12:08:42 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 2:17:56 AM UTC-8, wsne... wrote:

BTW, you still owe me an apology for calling me a liar.

You owe me something first, you coward.

I owe you nothing. YOU owe me an apology. You aren't man enough to offer it.

Oh, but I am... right after you answer my question, which I asked first. But you won't, so I won't. You are too cowardly to answer, it would only prove your ignorance.

It doesn't work that way you little child. You still owe me the apology. In the long run it is going to go easier on you if you offer it.

Oh get a life, you cowardly loser... you still owe me an answer.

On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 3:38:23 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:

Oh get a life, you cowardly loser... you still owe me an answer.

I don't owe you anything you little PoS. I can answer or not answer any question I see here. Get it?

Now, you WERE mistaken about what you had written and in the very same sentence you called me a liar. I have pointed out your mistake, and if you don't apologize I will continue to point out your mistake and demand the apology which anyone can plainly see is owed to me. Understood?

On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 3:57:14 PM UTC-8, wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 3:38:23 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:

Oh get a life, you cowardly loser... you still owe me an answer.

I don't owe you anything you little PoS. I can answer or not answer any question I see here. Get it?

Same goes for me, you coward.

You asked "Don't you owe me an apology?"

Just like you, I can answer or not answer any question I see here. Get it?

"palsing" wrote in message
...

This will drive Gerald crazy...

http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/details.cgi?aid=4253

.... but it is really a cool and unusual perspective.

\Paul A

================================================
Not at all, you've just given him the "proof" that the Moon doesn't turn on
its own axis, which has been his claim all along.
And look, the central sun is moving! You know that can't be right.

This will drive Gerald Kelleher crazy, make Tycho Brahe happy and send
Nickelarse Copperknickers into paroxysms of laughter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nI3Ky8mhj8

.... but it is really a cool and unusual perspective.

-- The Reverend Lord Androcles.
Je suis Charlie.

On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 8:34:52 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 3:57:14 PM UTC-8, wrote:

I don't owe you anything you little PoS. I can answer or not answer any question I see here. Get it?

Same goes for me, you coward.

You asked "Don't you owe me an apology?"

Just like you, I can answer or not answer any question I see here. Get it?

Neither of us need to answer a question in order for YOU to offer the apology you owe me. Simple.

On Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 9:51:13 AM UTC, Lord Androcles wrote:

Not at all, you've just given him the "proof" that the Moon doesn't turn on
its own axis, which has been his claim all along.
And look, the central sun is moving! You know that can't be right.

This will drive Gerald Kelleher crazy, make Tycho Brahe happy and send
Nickelarse Copperknickers into paroxysms of laughter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nI3Ky8mhj8

... but it is really a cool and unusual perspective.

-- The Reverend Lord Androcles.
Je suis Charlie.

You are being a nuisance Parker but to your credit there are a whole lot of you out there and especially those involved in the education system. Nobody believes the moon spins no more than they imagine that rotations and 24 hour days fall out of step but it is difficult to say whether the wider population prefers it that way or that you obey the dictates of a twisted disorder that surfaces in these ridiculous notions that I have gone to the trouble of sourcing.

The issue is how the moon's orbital behavior around the Earth is entirely different to a planet's orbital behavior as it makes a circuit of the Sun and this type of practical astronomy has been extinct for quite some time even though it is on its way back.

The environs of SAA are perhaps the most conducive for practicing this type of astronomy and so what if some try their damnest to disrupt the flow of information insofar as the outside world is exactly like that. Shame that Alsing's and Collin's resolve is crumbling by opting to get mixed up with the mediocre when the alternative is much more productive for them in their advancing age.

I don't have to force people to read Kepler's description of lunar motion and , despite his conclusion of variable orbital speed, he is still part of the scenery which relied heavily on a less productive approach which uses the Sun's apparent motion through the Zodiac.

You can be 100% that nothing you post is ever going to be taken seriously. If you had any genuine insight into astronomy that all the rest of us had missed you would explain your discovery far more clearly and answer questions about it with honesty and enthusiasm.

But you don't! Has your total failure over the last 10 years taught you nothing!

On Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 4:03:10 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 8:34:52 PM UTC-5, palsing wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 3:57:14 PM UTC-8, wrote:

I don't owe you anything you little PoS. I can answer or not answer any question I see here. Get it?

Same goes for me, you coward.

You asked "Don't you owe me an apology?"

Just like you, I can answer or not answer any question I see here. Get it?

Neither of us need to answer a question in order for YOU to offer the apology you owe me. Simple.

Ain't gonna happen, you cowardly loser, until you answer my question first.