What if (on Darla)

"Nightcrawler" wrote in message
...
On 12/19/2009 7:54 PM, Lomriy wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqRzdpd3tAs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8tUvVsXFYM&feature=fvsr

Sapiot.


As if I wasn't aware of their eating habits. You claimed
something different.

Fakriot.

No, I went back and reread and I did not claim something different.
I just pointed out to Saul AND Jeff that sometimes the little fish gets the
big fish.
Like a human when he goes to the grocery and buys a rump roast.
Take your tinted glasses off when you read.

Academiot hee

--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!

Hey, you old FART!
I'm down wif dat!
You're so easy to ridicule, I hardly know where to start.

You... you are A ROCK, you are an IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIsland!
And a rock feels no pain . . .
And an island nehhh-ver cries.

Honestly?
You don't deserve ridicule.
You deserve sympathy.
Darla tries hard to give you empathy.
It's because she's been there, done that, got the tee-shirt AND the baseball
cap.
She's played the human role more times than you ever POSSIBLY could no
matter HOW many lives you attain.
She actually enjoys being human.

So you tell me.
What's the attraction?
What's so great about being you?
Especially having to live there with all those OTHER insapient "sapiens".
What's the draw?

"Saul Levy" wrote in message
news
More PSYCHO-BABBLE, Darla? lmfjao!

You're still a FAKE!

Ridicule IS the answer!

Saul Levy


On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:54:31 -0500, "Lomriy"
wrote:

You sound more like a fake and fraud to me.
Your William Shakespeare once wrote, "The lady doth protest too much,
methinks."
Your FEAR just oozes from your posts.
Why are you so afraid of the FACT that there could be a technologically
superior people who exist and who already know about you?
Why do you panic at the sight of every sean word?

You bark like a rabid squirrel!
A fearful rabid little squirrel who tries to bite everyone in sight.

Go away.
Just go away.

But you won't go away, will you.
You'll just stay here and make life miserable for most of the people here
who post.
I've never seen more UGLY words from a more UGLY "so called" human being.

I wonder if human parents still tell their little children that there are
no
monsters?
Then they go to the library, get on the computer, find alt.astronomy, read
your posts and find out that their parents lied to them.

"Saul Levy" wrote in message
. ..
Yeah, and you ****ERS are oh so special! lmfjao!

In your own mind, Darla!

What a FRAUD!

BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I'm LAUGHING SO HARD AT YOU! That's ALL YOU DESERVE!

A RACE OF ONE WHO ARE LYING ****ERS and IDIOTS!

Saul Levy


On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 20:37:22 -0500, "Pros Pere"
wrote:

"HVAC" wrote in message
...

"Pros Pere" wrote in message
g.com...

Especially if there IS no clockmaker.


If there truly is a clock, then there must be a clockmaker.
Classic ontological argument.
Some holes in that one, it is granted.

Well, causality is a bitch.

We don't know what caused the big bang. I have aquaintences
that have theories but they always start with 'could have'.

We just don't know and maybe never will.


Be patient.
There was a time when humans thought they would never know how to soar
the
skies of Sol.


The human mind is unable to conceive of the four
dimensions,


I find it rather easy to do. Don't you?


Just to SAY one finds it rather easy to do is only a beginning.
The saying is not the doing.
If it's so easy, then it should be a snap for you to do it in your
response to this post.


What? To explain 4 dimensions? Sure, no problem.
I'll explain it as I do to children.

OK we all are familiar with 3 dimensions... We go back and forth
and side to side and up and down. Everyone with me? Good.

Now envision 2 hunters in the woods. They decide to meet at
a certain place and elevation on a map. Hunter A gets there and
hunter B is nowhere to be found. A few hours later, hunter B
arrives and finds no hunter A.... He went home.

Next day the two of them decide to meet at the same place at
11:45 am. Hunter A arrive at the same time as hunter B and
they get rip roaring drunk and shoot up a few road signs.
(road sign hunting is popular where I live)

And THAT kiddies is 4 dimensional physics NH style.



Homo "sapiens".
Hah!
Homo "phobiens" would be SO much more appropriate.
I suppose that may have a different meaning than I intended.
You get the drift.


You're a homo?



Homo vs. hetero?
I don't know.
Take your pick.
We are homogeneous and we mate for life.
All seans are capable of both seeding and bearing offspring.
For example, I am "father" to Silouen (Sil), whose "mother" is Darla,
and
I
am "mother" to Lomriy (Lomie), whose "father" is Darla.

The closest your classification comes would be:
Order Cetacea
Suborder Odontoceti

Your science has no family, genus nor species that closely resembles us,
neither extant nor extinct.


--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!

Me?
I'm just a kid.
What's so disgusting?
You hate kids or something?
Y' old farT!

"Saul Levy" wrote in message
...
So, you were LYING about that too?

No surprise there!

It's YOU who are DISGUSTING!

Saul Levy


On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:16:03 -0500, "Lomriy"
wrote:

UGH!
I HATE studying humans.

"Saul Levy" wrote in message
. ..
**** the PSYCHO-BABBLE, IDIOT!

We don't CARE!

Just as I thought: sean don't even exist! That's YOUR DELUSION!

Saul Levy


On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 19:46:49 -0500, "Pros Pere"
wrote:

You know me well enough, Double-A, to know that I am disgusted with
humans
on a species level.
And you also know that I am disgusted by many humans on an individual
level,
as well.
But there are some things that cannot be taken away from you.
There are some traits of humanity that are noble and honorable.
Pasteur was human, and humans are completely to blame for eradicating
wild
smallpox from the entire face of the Earth.
The only downside that I see is that humans have been "sitting on their
laurels" for far too long on this issue.
So many diseases, so little time?

Figure out what it is you really want.
Then start today and begin to build... start small, spend a little time
each
day building... and keep on building.
Never, ever stop.
Yes, for some it's a "rebuild" proposition.
Other humans have done it.
Most any human is capable of doing it.

Just keep climbing the ladder.
And when you get to "the top", ignore that comfy "laurels" chair and
find
another ladder.

Life is so much more fun when your feet are dry (except of course when
swimmin').
Do you swim, Double-A?
That may be where you pick up those fungi.
Wash those tootsies well after you swim!

What you're doing now is actually quite admirable.
Build upon that if you like.

Both humans and seans are builders and explorers.
I try to spend a little time each day doing both.
It is my duty to myself.


--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!


“Big Fish Eats Little Fish�

You ( Lomriy ) told NightCrawler:
“ sometimes the little fish gets the big fish.
Like a human when he goes to the grocery and buys a rump roast. �.

As a team, humans can eat an orca pod.
As a team, an orca pod can eat a whale.
As a team, ants can eat a rubber tree.

“ Just what makes that little ol' ant
think he'll move that rubber tree plant ?

Anyone knows an ant CAN'T move a rubber tree plant. �
―― Frank Sinatra

On 12/20/2009 8:02 AM, Lomriy wrote:

No, I went back and reread and I did not claim something different.
I just pointed out to Saul AND Jeff that sometimes the little fish gets the
big fish.
Like a human when he goes to the grocery and buys a rump roast.
Take your tinted glasses off when you read.

I guess you forgot your own context, then.

"Killer whales attack and eat much bigger whales, you schmuck!
GROW up and get - a - LIFE !
Don't you "sapiens" know ANYTHING ?"

was a response, by one of your personalities, to Saul stating that
killer whales ate porpoises.

Thus, it was you making the implication that they only ate LARGER,
fellow WHALES. Or, that their diet was exclusively larger whales.
I provided evidence to the contrary. You provided evidence that
didn't counter what I provided. Case closed.

1) Killer whales are not whales.
2) Killer whales eat whatever they want.
3) Delphiniot.
4) Cetaciot.

Friggin' land Orcaleeun.

On Dec 20, 8:04*am, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 12/20/2009 8:02 AM, Lomriy wrote:

No, I went back and reread and I did not claim something different.
I just pointed out to Saul AND Jeff that sometimes the little fish gets the
big fish.
Like a human when he goes to the grocery and buys a rump roast.
Take your tinted glasses off when you read.

I guess you forgot your own context, then.

"Killer whales attack and eat much bigger whales, you schmuck!
GROW up and get - a - LIFE !
Don't you "sapiens" know ANYTHING ?"

was a response, by one of your personalities, to Saul stating that
killer whales ate porpoises.

Thus, it was you making the implication that they only ate LARGER,
fellow WHALES. *Or, that their diet was exclusively larger whales.
I provided evidence to the contrary. *You provided evidence that
didn't counter what I provided. *Case closed.

1) Killer whales are not whales.
2) Killer whales eat whatever they want.
3) Delphiniot.
4) Cetaciot.

Friggin' land Orcaleeun.

They obviously don't know their own kind, much less care about or
police their own kind. The difference between those ZNR Rothschilds
and these 'sean' are insignificant.

~ BG

wrote in message
...

“Big Fish Eats Little Fish�

You ( Lomriy ) told NightCrawler:
“ sometimes the little fish gets the big fish.
Like a human when he goes to the grocery and buys a rump roast. �.

As a team, humans can eat an orca pod.
As a team, an orca pod can eat a whale.
As a team, ants can eat a rubber tree.

“ Just what makes that little ol' ant
think he'll move that rubber tree plant ?

Anyone knows an ant CAN'T move a rubber tree plant. �
―― Frank Sinatra

oooooooo ! Frankie !

hee

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcNyxxZvf8I

--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!

WHAT eh-ver

Guess that "acedemiot" pushed your li'l buttons, huh.
fear fear fear fear fear

That smell ain't gahlic, dahling!

"Nightcrawler" wrote in message
...
On 12/20/2009 8:02 AM, Lomriy wrote:

No, I went back and reread and I did not claim something different.
I just pointed out to Saul AND Jeff that sometimes the little fish gets
the
big fish.
Like a human when he goes to the grocery and buys a rump roast.
Take your tinted glasses off when you read.

I guess you forgot your own context, then.

"Killer whales attack and eat much bigger whales, you schmuck!
GROW up and get - a - LIFE !
Don't you "sapiens" know ANYTHING ?"

was a response, by one of your personalities, to Saul stating that
killer whales ate porpoises.

Thus, it was you making the implication that they only ate LARGER,
fellow WHALES. Or, that their diet was exclusively larger whales.
I provided evidence to the contrary. You provided evidence that
didn't counter what I provided. Case closed.

1) Killer whales are not whales.
2) Killer whales eat whatever they want.
3) Delphiniot.
4) Cetaciot.

Friggin' land Orcaleeun.


--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!