|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
shuttle LOX line vs Saturn V LOX lines
How is it that the Shuttle can pump sufficient LOX through one long line
(140 feet?), which apparently has at least a few near-90-degree bends in it, while the S-V had to run five huge lines, maybe 50 feet long each, straight through the RP1 tank to the engines? It must have been a tremendous PITA to get those tank pentrations, tunnels, bellows, etc, all worked out and manufactured. Is it just a matter of the huge difference in flow rates between the two vehicles? Why wouldn't one giant line, the size of a Redstone tank, say, draining into a big sump in the S-IC's thrust structure have sufficed? Would boost pumps in the sump have been the only way to make that work? J |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
shuttle LOX line vs Saturn V LOX lines
"Mr Jim" wrote in
: How is it that the Shuttle can pump sufficient LOX through one long line (140 feet?), which apparently has at least a few near-90-degree bends in it, while the S-V had to run five huge lines, maybe 50 feet long each, straight through the RP1 tank to the engines? It must have been a tremendous PITA to get those tank pentrations, tunnels, bellows, etc, all worked out and manufactured. Is it just a matter of the huge difference in flow rates between the two vehicles? Why wouldn't one giant line, the size of a Redstone tank, say, draining into a big sump in the S-IC's thrust structure have sufficed? Would boost pumps in the sump have been the only way to make that work? Take a good look at how the Russian N-1 moon rocket handled it. The lines, and there were many more of them, were all external. --Damon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
shuttle LOX line vs Saturn V LOX lines
Damon Hill wrote: Take a good look at how the Russian N-1 moon rocket handled it. The lines, and there were many more of them, were all external. That was a complete mess of a way to handle it, but they were limited by having the kerosene on top in the first three stages; running plumbing through the LOX tank meant the pipes would have chilled during fueling to the point where the kerosene would have frozen when it passed through them: http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/n/n1cut.gif Pat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
shuttle LOX line vs Saturn V LOX lines
In article ,
Mr Jim wrote: How is it that the Shuttle can pump sufficient LOX through one long line (140 feet?), which apparently has at least a few near-90-degree bends in it, while the S-V had to run five huge lines, maybe 50 feet long each, straight through the RP1 tank to the engines? Well, it wasn't a question of "had to" -- rarely are alternative designs *impossible*. Mostly you get to choose which headaches you prefer. :-) It's a mistake to infer that the designs actually put into service are somehow optimal; in fact, sometimes it's more a case of "it seemed like a good idea at the time...". In this case, some of it was differences in requirements. The Saturn V had much higher flow rates to support far higher engine thrust, and very little room under the kerosene tank. While the shuttle had a requirement for a joint at which the plumbing could cleanly separate... a joint that had to be covered by mission-critical doors in a surface exposed to high heating on reentry. So the S-IC designers had major incentive to provide the simplest and most direct flow path to five voracious engines, while the orbiter designers urgently wanted to minimize the width and complexity of the connection to the ET. ...Why wouldn't one giant line, the size of a Redstone tank, say, draining into a big sump in the S-IC's thrust structure have sufficed? Would boost pumps in the sump have been the only way to make that work? Something like that might well have been necessary, given that the S-IC's designers rejected even going around the outside of the kerosene tank as difficult for those flow rates. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
shuttle LOX line vs Saturn V LOX lines
"Damon Hill" wrote in message 31... Take a good look at how the Russian N-1 moon rocket handled it. The lines, and there were many more of them, were all external. I'd rather not look at the N-1 - too much of mess :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
shuttle LOX line vs Saturn V LOX lines
Mr Jim wrote: I'd rather not look at the N-1 - too much of mess :-) Makes a fascinating model though, all girders and bumps; looks like some sort of Marxist lighthouse more than a rocket: http://www.ninfinger.org/~sven/models/realspace/n1.html Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A French Vegeratian and a Cannibal, Column (improved), walk in line, walk in line! | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 23rd 07 07:03 PM |
ASTRO: Splitting the 658.4 [NII] line from the 656.4 Halpha line | Richard Crisp | Astro Pictures | 7 | November 29th 06 06:14 AM |
Orion Between the Lines | John Whisenhunt | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 4th 05 07:01 PM |
It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived) | Ed Kyle | Policy | 76 | July 4th 05 05:12 PM |
Back to the Moon on what? Saturn V, Magnum, Ares launcher, Shuttle Z | TKalbfus | Policy | 179 | January 16th 04 02:11 AM |