|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A "Z" Prize to Luna?
Was thinking about how uninspiring it would be to design Orbitels. The
moon's the thing. Realized that Lunar thinking has to be taken to the next stage, the slow and steady approach. Forget Apollo-type thinking altogether and step outa the box. Lindbergh came to mind. The trans-atlantic prize was huge fortune, showing how little it was considered winnable. When others were thinking bomber-sized craft, Charles went ahead and did it with a small heavy-duty Cessna type of plane. And while Colombus used three ships to cross the Atlantic, we know today that it can be done in a 30 foot sloop. That's why I'm saying let's get back to the root of the problem and forget the current thinking. Facts; the Luna trip is a half million miles round-trip through vacuum, two gravity fields and solar wind and sunshine. Now rule out the application of high thrust rocket engines, like Lindbergh ruled out jet bombers, and what can we come up with? I see some sort of combination-powered craft that cannot achieve LEO speeds in its initial launch period and must go directly to Luna in a "slow" and steady fashion. Bring up any ideas? Let's call it the "Z" Prize! ^ //^\\ ~~~ near space elevator ~~~~ ~~~members.aol.com/beanstalkr/~~~ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A "Z" Prize to Luna?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A "Z" Prize to Luna?
Tom Merkle wrote: pamsuX (Allen Meece) wrote in message ... Was thinking about how uninspiring it would be to design Orbitels. The moon's the thing. Realized that Lunar thinking has to be taken to the next stage, the slow and steady approach. Forget Apollo-type thinking altogether and step outa the box. Lindbergh came to mind. The trans-atlantic prize was huge fortune, showing how little it was considered winnable. When others were thinking bomber-sized craft, Charles went ahead and did it with a small heavy-duty Cessna type of plane. by his own admission, he came pretty close to dying. Mostly because of navigation and falling asleep issues, I think. By the end of WWII, we had at least one B-17 flying back to the US from Europe where everyone on board, including both pilots, feel asleep. Things change quickly. I think you get to the Moon by propositioning supplies there using remotely controlled unmanned systems and then by flying one person at a time in, who would then ultimately land with only a rocket pack on his back. Return would be a simple reuse of the rocket pack to rendezvous in lunar orbit with a returning spacecraft, perhaps another one man craft of the type that the original person took to the Moon which had just been used to get the replacement moon visitor to the Moon. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
X Prize query | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 1 | July 29th 04 02:14 PM |
Wednesday, Sep 29 -- the first SpaceShipOne flight in a two-part try at the X-Prize. | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 27th 04 10:09 PM |
was June 21 an X Prize attempt? | Tamas Feher | Space Shuttle | 23 | June 27th 04 03:21 AM |
X Prize 2 | Bootstrap Bill | Technology | 42 | May 7th 04 04:46 AM |
The X Prize is stupid | garfangle | Policy | 40 | October 12th 03 02:57 AM |