|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Space Race Driven By The Nuclear Threat - Now A Mainstream Understanding
On Mar 5, 4:25*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 5, 1:09*pm, Dean wrote: On Mar 2, 8:06*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 1, 10:54*am, Stuf4 wrote: From Fred J. McCall: Stuf4 wrote: From Fred J. McCall: David Spain wrote: Rick Jones wrote: David Spain wrote: Rick Jones wrote: Sputnik was a hollowed-out nuclear weapon??? rick jones Well it had the proper geometry... A sphere was/is the proper geometry for the warhead on an ICBM? Tisk, tisk; you said nuclear weapon, you did not say warhead.... ;-) And he certainly didn't say RV, which is something else again.. Seeing how spheres *were* used by the Soviet Union, I'd say that it is a totally feasible geometry for the weapon, the warhead AND the RV. I take it they don't let you do engineering or design work... Open-minded thinkers who know what is feasible - instead of just doing things out of habit - make better engineers and designers than those who lack such attributes. Of course, as is repeatedly demonstrated on this forum, there are many who will not hold such a view. *It is FAR more comfortable to keep one's thought processes so restrained as to remain well within the confines of the perceived 'box'. ...and if anyone comes along to challenge limited thinking, do not so much as peek outside your box, for therein lies the discomfort. -- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the *truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-- Thomas Jefferson (Well said, TJ.) ~ CT Fred is master of his cozy box. Fred wants all of us to fit into the exact same mainstream status-quo box. However, a large hollow sphere of plutonium is relatively harmless, unless it contained a few tonnes of weaponized VX or something other that's biologically lethal. And this from the same man who raves about the dangers of MOX? -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine Perhaps Brad would care to rub his hands over a plutonium sphere and see if it has any ill effects on him. A brief exposure isn't lethal or even all that problematic, as long as you don't ingest any of it. It sure as hell isn't going to explode, although it could be warm or even hot to the touch if there's enough product density and mass to work with. For example, use as a hollow but otherwise regulation mass (7.2 kg) bowling ball would be doable, though I sure as hell wouldn't care to sleep with it. *http://groups.google.com/groups/search *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Have you ever been around plutonium? My guess is no. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Space Race Driven By The Nuclear Threat - Now A Mainstream Understanding
On Feb 28, 3:25*pm, Stuf4 wrote:
It is refreshing to know that an accurate understanding of Space ....It is disgusting to know that after my being gone for almost two years, you're *still* contaminating usenet with your CT Nutter drivel. Can't you just ****ing *die* and put yourself out of our misery? [shakes head in utter disgust] OM |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Space Race Driven By The Nuclear Threat - Now A Mainstream Understanding
On Mar 1, 9:21špm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Before you try 'logic', try 'reality'. ....C'mon, Fred. After all these years, we'd have better luck expecting Chumpko to try logic, much less reality, and even much less admitting either exist, before ~CT would even consider the attempt. sigh âÏÌØÛÅ ×ÅÝÅÊ ÉÚÍÅÎÑÅÔÓÑ... OM |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Space Race Driven By The Nuclear Threat - Now A Mainstream Understanding
On Mar 6, 11:30*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Dean wrote: On Mar 5, 4:25*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 5, 1:09*pm, Dean wrote: Perhaps Brad would care to rub his hands over a plutonium sphere and see if it has any ill effects on him. A brief exposure isn't lethal or even all that problematic, as long as you don't ingest any of it. It sure as hell isn't going to explode, although it could be warm or even hot to the touch if there's enough product density and mass to work with. For example, use as a hollow but otherwise regulation mass (7.2 kg) bowling ball would be doable, though I sure as hell wouldn't care to sleep with it. Have you ever been around plutonium? *My guess is no. He's actually right. *Pu isn't as dangerous as people seem to think. The metal is pretty safe as long as *you don't do something silly like light it on fire or grind and cut on it so that it produces dust that you can inhale. You can hold the stuff pretty much indefinitely, although I'd prefer to be wearing latex gloves and have the Pu coated with mineral oil just to make sure there's no dust or particles adhering to my hands that I could transfer to my lungs. It's amazing that even a Guthball can get something right once in a while.... And before you ask, yes, I've been around the stuff. -- "Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to * * live in the real world." * * * * * * * * * * * -- Mary Shafer, NASA Dryden Well Fred, that's just it. Plutonium is very reactive and by itself will oxidize readily from atmospheric air and moisture. Your hands would do an even better job. And as it oxidizes, it spalls off those tiny little particles of PuO2 that when inhaled will end up killing you. Plutonium is nasty stuff. No one in their right minds would consider handling it as our resident Guthball says. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Space Race Driven By The Nuclear Threat - Now A Mainstream Understanding
On Mar 6, 5:57*pm, Dean wrote:
On Mar 5, 4:25*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 5, 1:09*pm, Dean wrote: On Mar 2, 8:06*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 1, 10:54*am, Stuf4 wrote: From Fred J. McCall: Stuf4 wrote: From Fred J. McCall: David Spain wrote: Rick Jones wrote: David Spain wrote: Rick Jones wrote: Sputnik was a hollowed-out nuclear weapon??? rick jones Well it had the proper geometry... A sphere was/is the proper geometry for the warhead on an ICBM? Tisk, tisk; you said nuclear weapon, you did not say warhead... ;-) And he certainly didn't say RV, which is something else again. Seeing how spheres *were* used by the Soviet Union, I'd say that it is a totally feasible geometry for the weapon, the warhead AND the RV. I take it they don't let you do engineering or design work... Open-minded thinkers who know what is feasible - instead of just doing things out of habit - make better engineers and designers than those who lack such attributes. Of course, as is repeatedly demonstrated on this forum, there are many who will not hold such a view. *It is FAR more comfortable to keep one's thought processes so restrained as to remain well within the confines of the perceived 'box'. ...and if anyone comes along to challenge limited thinking, do not so much as peek outside your box, for therein lies the discomfort. -- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the *truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-- Thomas Jefferson (Well said, TJ.) ~ CT Fred is master of his cozy box. Fred wants all of us to fit into the exact same mainstream status-quo box. However, a large hollow sphere of plutonium is relatively harmless, unless it contained a few tonnes of weaponized VX or something other that's biologically lethal. And this from the same man who raves about the dangers of MOX? -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine Perhaps Brad would care to rub his hands over a plutonium sphere and see if it has any ill effects on him. A brief exposure isn't lethal or even all that problematic, as long as you don't ingest any of it. It sure as hell isn't going to explode, although it could be warm or even hot to the touch if there's enough product density and mass to work with. For example, use as a hollow but otherwise regulation mass (7.2 kg) bowling ball would be doable, though I sure as hell wouldn't care to sleep with it. *http://groups.google.com/groups/search *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Have you ever been around plutonium? *My guess is no. What's your point, or what that another kosher fart? Plutonium is a metal, isn't it? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meteor threat: Obama: 'A credible terrorist threat against our country' | Warhol[_1_] | Misc | 12 | November 1st 10 12:16 PM |
Race and the Space Race | David Lesher | History | 1 | February 21st 10 08:27 AM |
Key to understanding universe is understanding our brains | GatherNoMoss | Policy | 8 | October 3rd 06 01:27 PM |
Electricity In Space? Score - Mainstream: 0, New Astrophysics: 1 | Mad Scientist | Misc | 1 | September 7th 04 02:38 PM |
Free ideas Deemed "Radical and a Threat" to Mainstream Science | Greg Neill | Misc | 1 | July 24th 04 08:00 AM |