|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline
This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan. The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection. When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of service. Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations. In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident. Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear reactors in their areas back online. All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest. If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54 nuclear reactors shut down. Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:
Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Cite? None? *STFU* bob Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 12, 6:14*pm, Dan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote: Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Cite? None? *STFU* bob Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/20120113_01.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 12, 1:24*pm, bob haller wrote:
Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan. The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection. When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of service. Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations. In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident. Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear reactors in their areas back online. All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest. If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54 nuclear reactors shut down. Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST They should plan on paying at least $1/kwhr, and choking pollution for the next decade. What could possibly go wrong with LNG supertankers in several harbors at any one time? http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 12, 8:52*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jan 12, 1:24*pm, bob haller wrote: Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan. The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection. When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of service. Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations. In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident. Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear reactors in their areas back online. All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest. If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54 nuclear reactors shut down. Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST They should plan on paying at least $1/kwhr, and choking pollution for the next decade. What could possibly go wrong with LNG supertankers in several harbors at any one time? *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” If you think some sort of nuclear power is relatively safe, then I suspect LNG might handled relatively safely. Of course, the excution will likely be flawed. So some great yellow flash in the night will a possible. And an earthquake could be the trigger. Imagine the results of a wave driven by quake effects on a supertanker in harbor. I do think they could do better than a dollar per KW. Nonetheless, Japan is a nation with huge problems. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 12, 3:14*pm, Dan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote: Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Cite? None? *STFU* bob Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Time and choice will determine what comes. It is quite mess both with the plants lost, land contaminated, and people exposed. There are aspects of cover up in the standard narrative. Obsolete reactors in an earthquake zone and a tsumami zone as well, not good. And coast of the USA has its reactors. I can't speak to their design. Can you? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 12, 3:14*pm, Dan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote: Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Cite? None? *STFU* bob Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/20120113_01.html This looks close. Second hit on my Google phrase search. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 13, 2:09*am, |"
wrote: On Jan 12, 3:14*pm, Dan wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote: Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Cite? None? *STFU* bob Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Time and choice will determine what comes. It is quite mess both with the plants lost, land contaminated, and people exposed. There are aspects of cover up in the standard narrative. Obsolete reactors in an earthquake zone and a tsumami zone as well, not good. And coast of the USA has its reactors. I can't speak to their design. Can you? Shortly after japans disaster the NRC said the US has the same problems with its plants. there are some reports the plants were damaged by the earthquake badly and already lost befire the wave hit |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 12, 10:54*pm, |"
wrote: On Jan 12, 8:52*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 12, 1:24*pm, bob haller wrote: Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan. The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection. When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of service. Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations. In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident. Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear reactors in their areas back online. All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest. If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54 nuclear reactors shut down. Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST They should plan on paying at least $1/kwhr, and choking pollution for the next decade. What could possibly go wrong with LNG supertankers in several harbors at any one time? *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” If you think some sort of nuclear power is relatively safe, then I suspect LNG might handled relatively safely. Of course, the excution will likely be flawed. So some great yellow flash in the night will a possible. And an earthquake could be the trigger. Imagine the results of a wave driven by quake effects on a supertanker in harbor. I do think they could do better than a dollar per KW. Nonetheless, Japan is a nation with huge problems. Thorium fueled reactors of the AP-1000 configuration that's greatly simplified, are as close to failsafe as Big-Energy gets. Of course you'd have to make do with paying not more than 5 cents per kwhr, because it wouldn't cost one half cent per kwhr to create. http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/10/min...-talks-to.html http://realdoctorstu.files.wordpress...comparison.jpg http://www.greentechmedia.com/articl...Nuclear-Power/ http://energyfromthorium.com/joomla/...64&It emid=63 There are thousands of such links pertaining to the positive/ constructive use of thorium instead of uranium. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese nuke power has nearly ended
On Jan 13, 7:18*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jan 12, 10:54*pm, |" wrote: On Jan 12, 8:52*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 12, 1:24*pm, bob haller wrote: Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90 percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service. Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan. The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection. When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of service. Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations.. In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident. Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear reactors in their areas back online. All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest. If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54 nuclear reactors shut down. Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST They should plan on paying at least $1/kwhr, and choking pollution for the next decade. What could possibly go wrong with LNG supertankers in several harbors at any one time? *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” If you think some sort of nuclear power is relatively safe, then I suspect LNG might handled relatively safely. Of course, the excution will likely be flawed. So some great yellow flash in the night will a possible. And an earthquake could be the trigger. Imagine the results of a wave driven by quake effects on a supertanker in harbor. I do think they could do better than a dollar per KW. Nonetheless, Japan is a nation with huge problems. Thorium fueled reactors of the AP-1000 configuration that's greatly simplified, are as close to failsafe as Big-Energy gets. *Of course you'd have to make do with paying not more than 5 cents per kwhr, because it wouldn't cost one half cent per kwhr to create. *http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/10/min...or-group-talks.... *http://realdoctorstu.files.wordpress...m-waste-compar.... *http://www.greentechmedia.com/articl...-Generate-Safe.... *http://energyfromthorium.com/joomla/...m_content&view... *There are thousands of such links pertaining to the positive/ constructive use of thorium instead of uranium. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I am all for nuke power, as long as a meltdown is unlikely but if it does occur the reactor still wouldnt leak. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fog control big brother power power power power! | gb6726 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 19th 07 07:25 PM |
What if HSF ended in 1975? | Space Cadet | Space Shuttle | 24 | February 21st 04 06:42 AM |
What if HSF ended in 1975? | Space Cadet | History | 26 | February 21st 04 06:42 AM |
What if HSF ended in 1975? | Space Cadet | Policy | 21 | February 21st 04 06:40 AM |
Beagle 2 Search Ended | Ricardo | UK Astronomy | 4 | February 13th 04 04:18 PM |