5th ed. book, Chapt.1 What is this Theory? ; #6; ATOM TOTALITY (AtomUniverse) replaces Big Bang theory

Chapter 1: What Is This Theory


In as few of words as possible to describe this theory is my
signature
block for my posts to the Internet:


The whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies.


If you look in a chemistry textbook of what an electron looks like,
it is not a ball shaped object but a whole lot of little dots that
form a cloud. So the Atom Totality theory is basically the idea that
the dots of the electron-cloud are galaxies in the night sky.


So as you look up in the night sky and see shiny white dots as
galaxies and as stars, those white dots are mass-pieces of the
last six electrons of 231Plutonium.


To describe the rival theory of the Big Bang theory would go like
this:


The universe arose from a big explosion.


That is the sum total to the Big Bang theory. It is simplistic and
does not have much information. It does not tell us why it
exploded and the Big Bang theory is not Quantum Mechanics.


The Atom Totality theory is all Quantum Mechanics for it posits that
only atoms,
including the Universe itself, exist. And the Atom Totality theory
is
a consistent theory
since it posits that only atoms exist. All matter is composed of
atoms
but science
neglected to complete the picture of logic by realizing that the
whole
entire universe
must also be an atom.


The Big Bang theory places all of its information into an
"explosion",
and
the Universe is not an entity, a "whole thing" in the Big Bang but
some
amorphous nonentity. The Big Bang is structureless. Whereas the Atom
Totality
has all the richness of atomic physics to lean on. We can talk about
size, about
shape, about structures such as a nucleus, and Cosmic protons and
cosmic
electrons. We can talk about a evolution or transformation of atoms.
With the
Big Bang we are left speechless and questionless, because there is
nothing
to talk about other than some explosion allegedly happened.


Laypersons and nonscientists and even a large proportion of alleged
scientists have
two major problems and errors with the Atom Totality theory and
these
two errors are :


(1) They cannot envision how the universe we see is the inside of one
big atom


(2) They mistakenly think that since plutonium is radioactive that
this
hinders the theory. They mistakenly think the Plutonium
Atom Totality will decay away and -out-goes-the-Universe. Here
one minute and gone the next, type of mistake.


So how do I answer those two most recurring errors that both
laypersons
and even most
trained scientists make as listed in (1) and (2) above?


I answer them by saying look at a chemistry textbook of the electron-
dot-cloud of atoms.
Their mistake is that they think the electron is a single ball that
goes moving around the
nucleus of an atom. It maybe a ball when the atom is collapsed
wavefunction such as the
moving of electricity in a wire. But an atom that is Uncollapsed
wavefunction has its
electrons as dot-clouds. The electron is a large cloud around the
nucleus of the atom and
is a huge number of dots. Each one of those dots is a tiny hunk or
piece of the electron.
So that if all the dots were put together then the electron would be
a
ball. So now we begin
to understand how a plutonium atom of its electrons is the galaxies
of
the night sky. That
each galaxy we see in the night sky is a tiny piece of an electron
of
the Atom Totality.


If you examine a chemistry textbook of the 5f6 or the s, or the p or
the d or the f orbital of
a electron you will see a electron-dot-cloud. That the electron is
not
a ball but those huge
number of dots.


So now we can easily envision the Atom Totality theory. We look at
the
night sky of all
those dots of light. Some of those dots of light are stars and some
are galaxies. And now
we look at the chemistry textbook of what an electron looks like and
it is a bunch of
dots around a nucleus. So that is the crux of the Atom Totality
theory, that galaxies
and stars (galaxies are just a concentration of stars) are dots of
the
electron dot cloud
and so we are living inside one big atom. And the chemical element
that fits the numbers
of physics and mathematics the very best is the chemical element
plutonium.


Now to answer the other most often mistake by laypersons and even
those who call themselves
scientists is the notion that if the Atom Totality was plutonium
that
it would decay and be gone.
The answer I give is that radioactivity is time itself. That our
universe, our cosmos would not have
time if the Atom Totality were not radioactive, or, at least, it
would
not have sufficient and ample enough
time to run the universe, like a machine that does not run well, or
like an animal or plant that does not
grow fast enough. Time is merely change of matter in position. If
every atom stood still and in place
and never changed position relative to all the other atoms,
then there would be no time. Life could
not exist if every atom were to stand
still and not move relative to other atoms. So, to answer why the
Atom
Totality is a radioactive element
is to say that you want the Universe to be a entity that has alot of
change going on and radioactivity
provides that change. We see this change every day in Cosmic
particles
of protons appearing uniformly
and of Cosmic gamma ray bursts. Radioactivity of the Atom Totality
is
what makes stars and planets
come into existence in that the daily accretion of particles of
radioactivity from the Nucleus of the Plutonium
Atom Totality is what gives us our Sun and Earth and Solar System
and
Milky Way Galaxy.


Summary: The Atom Totality Theory is easy to state for it simply says
that the Universe itself is one big
atom and the chemical element that fits the special constants and
numbers of physics and mathematics
the best is plutonium, specifically 231Pu. When one asks for a
similar
explanation of the Big Bang theory
one gets no description whatsoever other than to say "explosion
happened". And the two most often
made mistakes about the Atom Totality theory is the error that an
electron is a single ball and the error
that plutonium radioactivity is incompatible or incongruent with an
Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

On Sep 26, 6:14*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
*Chapter 1: What Is This Theory

In as few of words as possible to describe this theory is my
signature
*block for my posts to the Internet:

The whole entire Universe is just one big atom
*where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies.

If you look in a chemistry textbook of what an electron looks like,
*it is not a ball shaped object but a whole lot of little dots that
*form a cloud. So the Atom Totality theory is basically the idea that
*the dots of the electron-cloud are galaxies in the night sky.

So as you look up in the night sky and see shiny white dots as
*galaxies and as stars, those white dots are mass-pieces of the
*last six electrons of 231Plutonium.

To describe the rival theory of the Big Bang theory would go like
*this:

The universe arose from a big explosion.

That is the sum total to the Big Bang theory. It is simplistic and
*does not have much information. It does not tell us why it
*exploded and the Big Bang theory is not Quantum Mechanics.

The Atom Totality theory is all Quantum Mechanics for it posits that
*only atoms,
*including the Universe itself, exist. And the Atom Totality theory
is
*a consistent theory
*since it posits that only atoms exist. All matter is composed of
atoms
*but science
*neglected to complete the picture of logic by realizing that the
whole
*entire universe
*must also be an atom.

The Big Bang theory places all of its information into an
"explosion",
*and
*the Universe is not an entity, a "whole thing" in the Big Bang but
*some
*amorphous nonentity. The Big Bang is structureless. Whereas the Atom
*Totality
*has all the richness of atomic physics to lean on. We can talk about
*size, about
*shape, about structures such as a nucleus, and Cosmic protons and
*cosmic
*electrons. We can talk about a evolution or transformation of atoms.
*With the
*Big Bang we are left speechless and questionless, because there is
*nothing
*to talk about other than some explosion allegedly happened.

Laypersons and nonscientists and even a large proportion of alleged
*scientists have
*two major problems and errors with the Atom Totality theory and
these
*two errors are :

(1) They cannot envision how the universe we see is the inside of one
*big atom

(2) They mistakenly think that since plutonium is radioactive that
*this
*hinders the theory. They mistakenly think the Plutonium
*Atom Totality will decay away and -out-goes-the-Universe. Here
*one minute and gone the next, type of mistake.

So how do I answer those two most recurring errors that both
*laypersons
*and even most
*trained scientists make as listed in (1) and (2) above?

I answer them by saying look at a chemistry textbook of the electron-
*dot-cloud of atoms.
*Their mistake is that they think the electron is a single ball that
*goes moving around the
*nucleus of an atom. It maybe a ball when the atom is collapsed
*wavefunction such as the
*moving of electricity in a wire. But an atom that is Uncollapsed
*wavefunction has its
*electrons as dot-clouds. The electron is a large cloud around the
*nucleus of the atom and
*is a huge number of dots. Each one of those dots is a tiny hunk or
*piece of the electron.
*So that if all the dots were put together then the electron would be
a
*ball. So now we begin
*to understand how a plutonium atom of its electrons is the galaxies
of
*the night sky. That
*each galaxy we see in the night sky is a tiny piece of an electron
of
*the Atom Totality.

If you examine a chemistry textbook of the 5f6 or the s, or the p or
*the d or the f orbital of
*a electron you will see a electron-dot-cloud. That the electron is
not
*a ball but those huge
*number of dots.

So now we can easily envision the Atom Totality theory. We look at
the
*night sky of all
*those dots of light. Some of those dots of light are stars and some
*are galaxies. And now
*we look at the chemistry textbook of what an electron looks like and
*it is a bunch of
*dots around a nucleus. So that is the crux of the Atom Totality
*theory, that galaxies
*and stars (galaxies are just a concentration of stars) are dots of
the
*electron dot cloud
*and so we are living inside one big atom. And the chemical element
*that fits the numbers
*of physics and mathematics the very best is the chemical element
*plutonium.

Now to answer the other most often mistake by laypersons and even
*those who call themselves
*scientists is the notion that if the Atom Totality was plutonium
that
*it would decay and be gone.
*The answer I give is that radioactivity is time itself. That our
*universe, our cosmos would not have
*time if the Atom Totality were not radioactive, or, at least, it
would
*not have sufficient and ample enough
*time to run the universe, like a machine that does not run well, or
*like an animal or plant that does not
*grow fast enough. Time is merely change of matter in position. If
*every atom stood still and in place
*and never changed position relative to all the other atoms,
*then there would be no time. Life could
*not exist if every atom were to stand
*still and not move relative to other atoms. So, to answer why the
Atom
*Totality is a radioactive element
*is to say that you want the Universe to be a entity that has alot of
*change going on and radioactivity
*provides that change. We see this change every day in Cosmic
particles
*of protons appearing uniformly
*and of Cosmic gamma ray bursts. Radioactivity of the Atom Totality
is
*what makes stars and planets
*come into existence in that the daily accretion of particles of
*radioactivity from the Nucleus of the Plutonium
*Atom Totality is what gives us our Sun and Earth and Solar System
and
*Milky Way Galaxy.

Summary: The Atom Totality Theory is easy to state for it simply says
*that the Universe itself is one big
*atom and the chemical element that fits the special constants and
*numbers of physics and mathematics
*the best is plutonium, specifically 231Pu. When one asks for a
similar
*explanation of the Big Bang theory
*one gets no description whatsoever other than to say "explosion
*happened". And the two most often
*made mistakes about the Atom Totality theory is the error that an
*electron is a single ball and the error
*that plutonium radioactivity is incompatible or incongruent with an
*Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies


Have you ever seen a movie where you turn on the TV half way through
and catch a scene where there's bits of a building flying all over the
place, people are ducking in ditches and flying through the air taking
a dive, 50 foot flames are everywhere, there's a big dark mushroom
cloud over the scene of debris, ... the firetruck comes racing... If
you get the chance, watch the movie in full next time to see what
happened to cause all that!

Herc

On Sep 25, 4:24*pm, Graham Cooper wrote:
On Sep 26, 6:14*am, Archimedes Plutonium



wrote:
*Chapter 1: What Is This Theory

In as few of words as possible to describe this theory is my
signature
*block for my posts to the Internet:

The whole entire Universe is just one big atom
*where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies.

If you look in a chemistry textbook of what an electron looks like,
*it is not a ball shaped object but a whole lot of little dots that
*form a cloud. So the Atom Totality theory is basically the idea that
*the dots of the electron-cloud are galaxies in the night sky.

So as you look up in the night sky and see shiny white dots as
*galaxies and as stars, those white dots are mass-pieces of the
*last six electrons of 231Plutonium.

To describe the rival theory of the Big Bang theory would go like
*this:

The universe arose from a big explosion.

That is the sum total to the Big Bang theory. It is simplistic and
*does not have much information. It does not tell us why it
*exploded and the Big Bang theory is not Quantum Mechanics.

The Atom Totality theory is all Quantum Mechanics for it posits that
*only atoms,
*including the Universe itself, exist. And the Atom Totality theory
is
*a consistent theory
*since it posits that only atoms exist. All matter is composed of
atoms
*but science
*neglected to complete the picture of logic by realizing that the
whole
*entire universe
*must also be an atom.

The Big Bang theory places all of its information into an
"explosion",
*and
*the Universe is not an entity, a "whole thing" in the Big Bang but
*some
*amorphous nonentity. The Big Bang is structureless. Whereas the Atom
*Totality
*has all the richness of atomic physics to lean on. We can talk about
*size, about
*shape, about structures such as a nucleus, and Cosmic protons and
*cosmic
*electrons. We can talk about a evolution or transformation of atoms.
*With the
*Big Bang we are left speechless and questionless, because there is
*nothing
*to talk about other than some explosion allegedly happened.

Laypersons and nonscientists and even a large proportion of alleged
*scientists have
*two major problems and errors with the Atom Totality theory and
these
*two errors are :

(1) They cannot envision how the universe we see is the inside of one
*big atom

(2) They mistakenly think that since plutonium is radioactive that
*this
*hinders the theory. They mistakenly think the Plutonium
*Atom Totality will decay away and -out-goes-the-Universe. Here
*one minute and gone the next, type of mistake.

So how do I answer those two most recurring errors that both
*laypersons
*and even most
*trained scientists make as listed in (1) and (2) above?

I answer them by saying look at a chemistry textbook of the electron-
*dot-cloud of atoms.
*Their mistake is that they think the electron is a single ball that
*goes moving around the
*nucleus of an atom. It maybe a ball when the atom is collapsed
*wavefunction such as the
*moving of electricity in a wire. But an atom that is Uncollapsed
*wavefunction has its
*electrons as dot-clouds. The electron is a large cloud around the
*nucleus of the atom and
*is a huge number of dots. Each one of those dots is a tiny hunk or
*piece of the electron.
*So that if all the dots were put together then the electron would be
a
*ball. So now we begin
*to understand how a plutonium atom of its electrons is the galaxies
of
*the night sky. That
*each galaxy we see in the night sky is a tiny piece of an electron
of
*the Atom Totality.

If you examine a chemistry textbook of the 5f6 or the s, or the p or
*the d or the f orbital of
*a electron you will see a electron-dot-cloud. That the electron is
not
*a ball but those huge
*number of dots.

So now we can easily envision the Atom Totality theory. We look at
the
*night sky of all
*those dots of light. Some of those dots of light are stars and some
*are galaxies. And now
*we look at the chemistry textbook of what an electron looks like and
*it is a bunch of
*dots around a nucleus. So that is the crux of the Atom Totality
*theory, that galaxies
*and stars (galaxies are just a concentration of stars) are dots of
the
*electron dot cloud
*and so we are living inside one big atom. And the chemical element
*that fits the numbers
*of physics and mathematics the very best is the chemical element
*plutonium.

Now to answer the other most often mistake by laypersons and even
*those who call themselves
*scientists is the notion that if the Atom Totality was plutonium
that
*it would decay and be gone.
*The answer I give is that radioactivity is time itself. That our
*universe, our cosmos would not have
*time if the Atom Totality were not radioactive, or, at least, it
would
*not have sufficient and ample enough
*time to run the universe, like a machine that does not run well, or
*like an animal or plant that does not
*grow fast enough. Time is merely change of matter in position. If
*every atom stood still and in place
*and never changed position relative to all the other atoms,
*then there would be no time. Life could
*not exist if every atom were to stand
*still and not move relative to other atoms. So, to answer why the
Atom
*Totality is a radioactive element
*is to say that you want the Universe to be a entity that has alot of
*change going on and radioactivity
*provides that change. We see this change every day in Cosmic
particles
*of protons appearing uniformly
*and of Cosmic gamma ray bursts. Radioactivity of the Atom Totality
is
*what makes stars and planets
*come into existence in that the daily accretion of particles of
*radioactivity from the Nucleus of the Plutonium
*Atom Totality is what gives us our Sun and Earth and Solar System
and
*Milky Way Galaxy.

Summary: The Atom Totality Theory is easy to state for it simply says
*that the Universe itself is one big
*atom and the chemical element that fits the special constants and
*numbers of physics and mathematics
*the best is plutonium, specifically 231Pu. When one asks for a
similar
*explanation of the Big Bang theory
*one gets no description whatsoever other than to say "explosion
*happened". And the two most often
*made mistakes about the Atom Totality theory is the error that an
*electron is a single ball and the error
*that plutonium radioactivity is incompatible or incongruent with an
*Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Have you ever seen a movie where you turn on the TV half way through
and catch a scene where there's bits of a building flying all over the
place, people are ducking in ditches and flying through the air taking
a dive, 50 foot flames are everywhere, there's a big dark mushroom
cloud over the scene of debris, ... the firetruck comes racing... *If
you get the chance, watch the movie in full next time to see what
happened to cause all that!

Herc

Watch the historical event: Herc meets Archie Poo. (A sequel to
Godzilla meets Frankenstein.)

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Chapter 1: What Is This Theory


Laypersons and nonscientists and even a large proportion of alleged
scientists have
two major problems and errors with the Atom Totality theory and
these
two errors are :


(1) They cannot envision how the universe we see is the inside of one
big atom

They never saw a chemistry or physics book showing a electron-dot-
cloud.


Or, they never understood that all those dots is one electron, those
10^60 dots
is equal to one electron.


They do not understand that those 10^60 dots for an electron is the
actual
single one electron itself.


And so they come into the Atom Totality theory with the false notion
that the hydrogen
atom electron is one tiny ball or 1 dot and that the uranium atom
has
92 tiny balls
revolving around it or 92 dots, or that the plutonium atom has 94
tiny
balls or
94 dots composing its electron dot cloud. When in fact, each
electron
of a hydrogen atom or a uranium atom or a Plutonium Atom has 10^60
dots that make-up or compose that specific individual electron.


When teaching the electron-dot-cloud in High School or in College, it
is perhaps not
taught strong enough that all those dots, 10^60 dots are one single
distinct electron.


Now the night sky of stars and galaxies, it is estimated that there
are only 10^11 galaxies
and there are only 10^11 stars on average in each galaxy. So that
would mean the
Cosmos has 10^11 x 10^11, or 10^22 stars, and if we represent each
of
those stars as a dot we would thence have 10^22 dots. But each star
is
composed of
atoms and a star is typically about 10^30 atoms so that would mean a
night sky
represented by dots for atoms would have 10^22 x 10^30 = 10^52 dots
which is a huge
number but a tiny number compared to 10^60 dots. If we included all
the other matter
in planets and in energy particles we come close to 10^60.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

(most snipped away)

The Big Bang theory places all of its information into an "explosion",
and
the Universe is not an entity, a "whole thing" in the Big Bang but
some
amorphous nonentity. The Big Bang is structureless. Whereas the
Atom
Totality
has all the richness of atomic physics to lean on. We can talk
about
size, about
shape, about structures such as a nucleus, and Cosmic protons and
cosmic
electrons. We can talk about a evolution or transformation of
atoms.
With the
Big Bang we are left speechless and questionless, because there is
nothing
to talk about other than some explosion allegedly happened.

I need to talk more about the fact that the Big Bang is so vague
about
anything.


I need to spend alot more time talking about the overall features of
the
Big Bang versus the Atom Totality. And I am having trouble in
finding
the
appropriate words to describe this inability of the Big Bang.


This topic alone, should persuade anyone, whether a trained scientist
or
a layperson that the Big Bang is a fake theory.


The best words to describe the situation so far are these:


(1) entity versus nonentity
(2) structures versus having no structure
(3) patterned versus amorphous or no patterns


The Atom Totality is a theory in which the Universe is a single
entity, a structured
single entity and a patterned single entity.


The Big Bang is only one thing -- an explosion. The Big Bang is not
an entity, and not a structure, and cannot have a internal pattern.


So that when Johns Hopkins in early 2000s reports a color for the
Universe, it could not be for a Big Bang since it is not a single
entity structure.


Or when Luminet team of researchers reported in the early 2000s that
the Cosmos fits a Poincare Dodecahedral Space geometry, they
could not be referring to the Big Bang because it is not a single
entity
with structure.


What I am looking for are more words and terminology to add to this
list.


Because the difference between a Big Bang theory and a Atom Totality
theory is that the Atom Totality theory insists that the Universe
has
always and forever will be a structured patterned entity. It is not
a
huge
onion or as the ancient philosophers once thought of a terra firma
resting
on the back of a elephant.


There is only one material object in the Cosmos that can be the
Cosmos
itself. It is not a piece of cheese for the Moon is not cheese. It
is
not the
onion nor the terra firma elephant. But it is the atom. In all of
the
Cosmos,
only the atom itself can be the entire Cosmos.


So the Big Bang never is able, nor is it possible to conceive of the
Big
Bang as a entity. And that should have eliminated the Big Bang
theory
as a viable theory of science. For it will always stay submerged in
its
obfuscation of some "explosion".


There is only one term that describes the Big Bang-- "explosion".
And that is vagueness, and in the veils of imagination and
daydreaming
or nightdreaming.


So without doing any further work. Without doing any evidence searth
or computations or experiments. The Big Bang should be dismissed as
a fake theory from the start, because it lacks clarity. It lacks
details. Big Bang is anti-science.


The Big Bang goes so far as to even imply that the laws of physics
were broken at the explosion or during the explosion and that some
time
after the explosion, when things settled down, do we even have
Physics
arising.


The Atom Totality theory says that the Universe has always been
Quantum
Mechanics, and always will be Quantum Mechanics.


So any commonsense person, even those that hate doing science, can
see
the deficiencies and faults of a Big Bang. That it is deceptive and
imaginary
and vague. It is everything that science should not be-- obfuse and
imaginary.


I am not happy with the few words and concepts of Entity, Structure,
Pattern that
distinguishes the Atom Totality from the Big Bang, and am looking for
more such words of description. And this is
important since
the Big Bang is defeated as a fake before the starting block.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

wrote:
On Sep 25, 4:24 pm, Graham wrote:
On Sep 26, 6:14 am, Archimedes Plutonium



wrote:
Chapter 1: What Is This Theory

In as few of words as possible to describe this theory is my
signature
block for my posts to the Internet:

The whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies.

If you look in a chemistry textbook of what an electron looks like,
it is not a ball shaped object but a whole lot of little dots that
form a cloud. So the Atom Totality theory is basically the idea that
the dots of the electron-cloud are galaxies in the night sky.

So as you look up in the night sky and see shiny white dots as
galaxies and as stars, those white dots are mass-pieces of the
last six electrons of 231Plutonium.

To describe the rival theory of the Big Bang theory would go like
this:

The universe arose from a big explosion.

That is the sum total to the Big Bang theory. It is simplistic and
does not have much information. It does not tell us why it
exploded and the Big Bang theory is not Quantum Mechanics.

The Atom Totality theory is all Quantum Mechanics for it posits that
only atoms,
including the Universe itself, exist. And the Atom Totality theory
is
a consistent theory
since it posits that only atoms exist. All matter is composed of
atoms
but science
neglected to complete the picture of logic by realizing that the
whole
entire universe
must also be an atom.

The Big Bang theory places all of its information into an
"explosion",
and
the Universe is not an entity, a "whole thing" in the Big Bang but
some
amorphous nonentity. The Big Bang is structureless. Whereas the Atom
Totality
has all the richness of atomic physics to lean on. We can talk about
size, about
shape, about structures such as a nucleus, and Cosmic protons and
cosmic
electrons. We can talk about a evolution or transformation of atoms.
With the
Big Bang we are left speechless and questionless, because there is
nothing
to talk about other than some explosion allegedly happened.

Laypersons and nonscientists and even a large proportion of alleged
scientists have
two major problems and errors with the Atom Totality theory and
these
two errors are :

(1) They cannot envision how the universe we see is the inside of one
big atom

(2) They mistakenly think that since plutonium is radioactive that
this
hinders the theory. They mistakenly think the Plutonium
Atom Totality will decay away and -out-goes-the-Universe. Here
one minute and gone the next, type of mistake.

So how do I answer those two most recurring errors that both
laypersons
and even most
trained scientists make as listed in (1) and (2) above?

I answer them by saying look at a chemistry textbook of the electron-
dot-cloud of atoms.
Their mistake is that they think the electron is a single ball that
goes moving around the
nucleus of an atom. It maybe a ball when the atom is collapsed
wavefunction such as the
moving of electricity in a wire. But an atom that is Uncollapsed
wavefunction has its
electrons as dot-clouds. The electron is a large cloud around the
nucleus of the atom and
is a huge number of dots. Each one of those dots is a tiny hunk or
piece of the electron.
So that if all the dots were put together then the electron would be
a
ball. So now we begin
to understand how a plutonium atom of its electrons is the galaxies
of
the night sky. That
each galaxy we see in the night sky is a tiny piece of an electron
of
the Atom Totality.

If you examine a chemistry textbook of the 5f6 or the s, or the p or
the d or the f orbital of
a electron you will see a electron-dot-cloud. That the electron is
not
a ball but those huge
number of dots.

So now we can easily envision the Atom Totality theory. We look at
the
night sky of all
those dots of light. Some of those dots of light are stars and some
are galaxies. And now
we look at the chemistry textbook of what an electron looks like and
it is a bunch of
dots around a nucleus. So that is the crux of the Atom Totality
theory, that galaxies
and stars (galaxies are just a concentration of stars) are dots of
the
electron dot cloud
and so we are living inside one big atom. And the chemical element
that fits the numbers
of physics and mathematics the very best is the chemical element
plutonium.

Now to answer the other most often mistake by laypersons and even
those who call themselves
scientists is the notion that if the Atom Totality was plutonium
that
it would decay and be gone.
The answer I give is that radioactivity is time itself. That our
universe, our cosmos would not have
time if the Atom Totality were not radioactive, or, at least, it
would
not have sufficient and ample enough
time to run the universe, like a machine that does not run well, or
like an animal or plant that does not
grow fast enough. Time is merely change of matter in position. If
every atom stood still and in place
and never changed position relative to all the other atoms,
then there would be no time. Life could
not exist if every atom were to stand
still and not move relative to other atoms. So, to answer why the
Atom
Totality is a radioactive element
is to say that you want the Universe to be a entity that has alot of
change going on and radioactivity
provides that change. We see this change every day in Cosmic
particles
of protons appearing uniformly
and of Cosmic gamma ray bursts. Radioactivity of the Atom Totality
is
what makes stars and planets
come into existence in that the daily accretion of particles of
radioactivity from the Nucleus of the Plutonium
Atom Totality is what gives us our Sun and Earth and Solar System
and
Milky Way Galaxy.

Summary: The Atom Totality Theory is easy to state for it simply says
that the Universe itself is one big
atom and the chemical element that fits the special constants and
numbers of physics and mathematics
the best is plutonium, specifically 231Pu. When one asks for a
similar
explanation of the Big Bang theory
one gets no description whatsoever other than to say "explosion
happened". And the two most often
made mistakes about the Atom Totality theory is the error that an
electron is a single ball and the error
that plutonium radioactivity is incompatible or incongruent with an
Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Have you ever seen a movie where you turn on the TV half way through
and catch a scene where there's bits of a building flying all over the
place, people are ducking in ditches and flying through the air taking
a dive, 50 foot flames are everywhere, there's a big dark mushroom
cloud over the scene of debris, ... the firetruck comes racing... If
you get the chance, watch the movie in full next time to see what
happened to cause all that!

Herc

Watch the historical event: Herc meets Archie Poo. (A sequel to
Godzilla meets Frankenstein.)

Mushroom clouds caused by nuclear explosions, in fiction movies .
I wonder how often that happens ...

David Bernier
--
true prophets are the gateway to true revelation
false prophets are the gateway to false revelation