|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#891
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know why my newsreader suddenly went to junk. Maybe it's corrupt.
This is about how your post looked to me. I will post this and see if it looks the same. In the mean time I will check out XNews as rk suggested and Mozilla as someone else suggested. Daniel |
#892
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om... "Charleston" wrote in message news:RT0Kc.8074$%p4.4337@okepread04... wrote: Scott, are you even old enough to drink???? What kind of question is that? This person with his pseudonyms has never once posted anything but his retarded so-called analyses on Apollo One. You realize you cite no one for us to connect your post to, yet you are critical of Scott? Name ONE person this moron has talked to with regard to the fire. He cannot, and neither can you. How do you know? Why? Because this idiot, like Scott, wants to just spew out soundbites, responsibility be damned, and they don't want to have to act like real people with a real responsibility to the facts. This is rich. Would you please go back and actually respond to a post so we can at least have some remote clue who you are talking about? It is NO surprise you would be sucked into this game; you have NO CLUE how to deal with real life. Uh, I am thinking Scott flies a big plane to far away real places and then flies the big plane back with real packages in his plane. That sounds like real life to me. You've got your "F" keys, and that is all your grade-school teacher taught you. There are not very many highly skilled pilots who stopped at the sixth grade education level. Perhaps you could enlighten us since you are a Junior in college, IIRC. I do fail to see how negative personal posts directed at Scott place you in the apparently highly respected position of being an ally of Scott's. Daniel OK, Daniel, I see you didn't keep up with the context of the post to which you are responding. That was directed at Hedrick, who has suddenly decided he is best friends with that anonymous "buddy" of Scott Grissoms. That was the conversation you apparently intercepted. I believe I posted that reply directly to a post by Scott Hedrick; I'm surprised you didn't see it. LaDonna For anyone wishing to explore how Google 2 works, only 38 clicks in the subject thread are required for verification. With DSL, that shouldn't have taken long at all, even for the group's ostensibly overworked busy beavers. |
#893
|
|||
|
|||
"John Maxson" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "Charleston" wrote in message news:RT0Kc.8074$%p4.4337@okepread04... wrote: Scott, are you even old enough to drink???? What kind of question is that? This person with his pseudonyms has never once posted anything but his retarded so-called analyses on Apollo One. You realize you cite no one for us to connect your post to, yet you are critical of Scott? Name ONE person this moron has talked to with regard to the fire. He cannot, and neither can you. How do you know? Why? Because this idiot, like Scott, wants to just spew out soundbites, responsibility be damned, and they don't want to have to act like real people with a real responsibility to the facts. This is rich. Would you please go back and actually respond to a post so we can at least have some remote clue who you are talking about? It is NO surprise you would be sucked into this game; you have NO CLUE how to deal with real life. Uh, I am thinking Scott flies a big plane to far away real places and then flies the big plane back with real packages in his plane. That sounds like real life to me. You've got your "F" keys, and that is all your grade-school teacher taught you. There are not very many highly skilled pilots who stopped at the sixth grade education level. Perhaps you could enlighten us since you are a Junior in college, IIRC. I do fail to see how negative personal posts directed at Scott place you in the apparently highly respected position of being an ally of Scott's. Daniel OK, Daniel, I see you didn't keep up with the context of the post to which you are responding. That was directed at Hedrick, who has suddenly decided he is best friends with that anonymous "buddy" of Scott Grissoms. That was the conversation you apparently intercepted. I believe I posted that reply directly to a post by Scott Hedrick; I'm surprised you didn't see it. LaDonna For anyone wishing to explore how Google 2 works, only 38 clicks in the subject thread are required for verification. With DSL, that shouldn't have taken long at all, even for the group's ostensibly overworked busy beavers. Thanks, although I would be curious to know what "Google 2" is. I've only used Google labs and the actual Google. Sheer curiousity; I don't have a lot of time to be an Internet "busy beaver." (I know who you meant.) I sign on, take care of business, and go on. :-) LaDonna |
#894
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om... "John Maxson" wrote in message ... "LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "Charleston" wrote in message news:RT0Kc.8074$%p4.4337@okepread04... wrote: Scott, are you even old enough to drink???? What kind of question is that? This person with his pseudonyms has never once posted anything but his retarded so-called analyses on Apollo One. You realize you cite no one for us to connect your post to, yet you are critical of Scott? Name ONE person this moron has talked to with regard to the fire. He cannot, and neither can you. How do you know? Why? Because this idiot, like Scott, wants to just spew out soundbites, responsibility be damned, and they don't want to have to act like real people with a real responsibility to the facts. This is rich. Would you please go back and actually respond to a post so we can at least have some remote clue who you are talking about? It is NO surprise you would be sucked into this game; you have NO CLUE how to deal with real life. Uh, I am thinking Scott flies a big plane to far away real places and then flies the big plane back with real packages in his plane. That sounds like real life to me. You've got your "F" keys, and that is all your grade-school teacher taught you. There are not very many highly skilled pilots who stopped at the sixth grade education level. Perhaps you could enlighten us since you are a Junior in college, IIRC. I do fail to see how negative personal posts directed at Scott place you in the apparently highly respected position of being an ally of Scott's. Daniel OK, Daniel, I see you didn't keep up with the context of the post to which you are responding. That was directed at Hedrick, who has suddenly decided he is best friends with that anonymous "buddy" of Scott Grissoms. That was the conversation you apparently intercepted. I believe I posted that reply directly to a post by Scott Hedrick; I'm surprised you didn't see it. LaDonna For anyone wishing to explore how Google 2 works, only 38 clicks in the subject thread are required for verification. With DSL, that shouldn't have taken long at all, even for the group's ostensibly overworked busy beavers. Thanks, although I would be curious to know what "Google 2" is. I've only used Google labs and the actual Google. Sheer curiousity; I don't have a lot of time to be an Internet "busy beaver." (I know who you meant.) I sign on, take care of business, and go on. :-) LaDonna Good point, obviously I'm far from perfect. It's actually called Google Groups Beta, I guess: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.space.history |
#895
|
|||
|
|||
"John Maxson" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "John Maxson" wrote in message ... "LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "Charleston" wrote in message news:RT0Kc.8074$%p4.4337@okepread04... wrote: Scott, are you even old enough to drink???? What kind of question is that? This person with his pseudonyms has never once posted anything but his retarded so-called analyses on Apollo One. You realize you cite no one for us to connect your post to, yet you are critical of Scott? Name ONE person this moron has talked to with regard to the fire. He cannot, and neither can you. How do you know? Why? Because this idiot, like Scott, wants to just spew out soundbites, responsibility be damned, and they don't want to have to act like real people with a real responsibility to the facts. This is rich. Would you please go back and actually respond to a post so we can at least have some remote clue who you are talking about? It is NO surprise you would be sucked into this game; you have NO CLUE how to deal with real life. Uh, I am thinking Scott flies a big plane to far away real places and then flies the big plane back with real packages in his plane. That sounds like real life to me. You've got your "F" keys, and that is all your grade-school teacher taught you. There are not very many highly skilled pilots who stopped at the sixth grade education level. Perhaps you could enlighten us since you are a Junior in college, IIRC. I do fail to see how negative personal posts directed at Scott place you in the apparently highly respected position of being an ally of Scott's. Daniel OK, Daniel, I see you didn't keep up with the context of the post to which you are responding. That was directed at Hedrick, who has suddenly decided he is best friends with that anonymous "buddy" of Scott Grissoms. That was the conversation you apparently intercepted. I believe I posted that reply directly to a post by Scott Hedrick; I'm surprised you didn't see it. LaDonna For anyone wishing to explore how Google 2 works, only 38 clicks in the subject thread are required for verification. With DSL, that shouldn't have taken long at all, even for the group's ostensibly overworked busy beavers. Thanks, although I would be curious to know what "Google 2" is. I've only used Google labs and the actual Google. Sheer curiousity; I don't have a lot of time to be an Internet "busy beaver." (I know who you meant.) I sign on, take care of business, and go on. :-) LaDonna Good point, obviously I'm far from perfect. It's actually called Google Groups Beta, I guess: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.space.history OH! lol I didn't intend it as a "point;" I honestly thought I was missing out on something. :-) LaDonna |
#896
|
|||
|
|||
"John Maxson" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "John Maxson" wrote in message ... "LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... "Charleston" wrote in message news:RT0Kc.8074$%p4.4337@okepread04... wrote: Scott, are you even old enough to drink???? What kind of question is that? This person with his pseudonyms has never once posted anything but his retarded so-called analyses on Apollo One. You realize you cite no one for us to connect your post to, yet you are critical of Scott? Name ONE person this moron has talked to with regard to the fire. He cannot, and neither can you. How do you know? Why? Because this idiot, like Scott, wants to just spew out soundbites, responsibility be damned, and they don't want to have to act like real people with a real responsibility to the facts. This is rich. Would you please go back and actually respond to a post so we can at least have some remote clue who you are talking about? It is NO surprise you would be sucked into this game; you have NO CLUE how to deal with real life. Uh, I am thinking Scott flies a big plane to far away real places and then flies the big plane back with real packages in his plane. That sounds like real life to me. You've got your "F" keys, and that is all your grade-school teacher taught you. There are not very many highly skilled pilots who stopped at the sixth grade education level. Perhaps you could enlighten us since you are a Junior in college, IIRC. I do fail to see how negative personal posts directed at Scott place you in the apparently highly respected position of being an ally of Scott's. Daniel OK, Daniel, I see you didn't keep up with the context of the post to which you are responding. That was directed at Hedrick, who has suddenly decided he is best friends with that anonymous "buddy" of Scott Grissoms. That was the conversation you apparently intercepted. I believe I posted that reply directly to a post by Scott Hedrick; I'm surprised you didn't see it. LaDonna For anyone wishing to explore how Google 2 works, only 38 clicks in the subject thread are required for verification. With DSL, that shouldn't have taken long at all, even for the group's ostensibly overworked busy beavers. Thanks, although I would be curious to know what "Google 2" is. I've only used Google labs and the actual Google. Sheer curiousity; I don't have a lot of time to be an Internet "busy beaver." (I know who you meant.) I sign on, take care of business, and go on. :-) LaDonna Good point, obviously I'm far from perfect. It's actually called Google Groups Beta, I guess: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.space.history Would you believe 'Groups 2 Beta?' http://labs.google.com/ |
#898
|
|||
|
|||
"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message
... In article , (john_thomas_maxson) wrote: Would you believe 'Groups 2 Beta?' http://labs.google.com/ Certainly. What I can't believe is how you fail to trim your quotes and somehow have managed to again slip out of my killfile. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." ~ Robert A. Heinlein http://www.angryherb.net While you're forever scratching your head (or whatever) about your faulty "killfile" logic, don't fail to consider that it's a fairly representative subset of *all* the fallacious logic you employ here. |
#899
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:46:26 -0500, Michael Gardner
wrote: Filtering on contains " seems to catch all his variations. Filtering on 'maxson' gets rid of them all. Why not everyone try it? |
#900
|
|||
|
|||
"Winky Dink...and You!" wrote in message
... On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:46:26 -0500, Michael Gardner wrote: Filtering on contains " seems to catch all his variations. Filtering on 'maxson' gets rid of them all. Why not everyone try it? Hey Bob, what took you so long? Scott sure had you pegged with "Nosely." How's Mr's Nosely? You know, the "Ignore" person. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|