A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cheap intensifiers for popular all sky cameras?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 1st 12, 06:08 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
W. eWatson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default Cheap intensifiers for popular all sky cameras?

See Subject. Anyone know whether such intensifiers might be available
say for some Watec or similar cameras?
  #2  
Old October 1st 12, 03:08 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,007
Default Cheap intensifiers for popular all sky cameras?

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 22:08:42 -0700, "W. eWatson"
wrote:

See Subject. Anyone know whether such intensifiers might be available
say for some Watec or similar cameras?


Intensifiers are not camera specific. Besides the intensifier, you'll
need two lenses- one that images the sky onto the intensifier
photocathode, and one that focuses the intensifier screen onto the
camera sensor.

There are cheap first generation intensifiers available (Russian
nightscopes and surplus), but they have a lot of distortion and poor
S/N. For good results you usually want a 2nd or 3rd generation
intensifier, and they are generally fairly expensive (hundreds of
dollars or more).
  #3  
Old October 1st 12, 04:37 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
W. eWatson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default Cheap intensifiers for popular all sky cameras?

On 10/1/2012 7:08 AM, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 22:08:42 -0700, "W. eWatson"
wrote:

See Subject. Anyone know whether such intensifiers might be available
say for some Watec or similar cameras?


Intensifiers are not camera specific. Besides the intensifier, you'll
need two lenses- one that images the sky onto the intensifier
photocathode, and one that focuses the intensifier screen onto the
camera sensor.

There are cheap first generation intensifiers available (Russian
nightscopes and surplus), but they have a lot of distortion and poor
S/N. For good results you usually want a 2nd or 3rd generation
intensifier, and they are generally fairly expensive (hundreds of
dollars or more).

Do you know of a seller for the 2nd and 3rd gen?
  #4  
Old October 1st 12, 06:36 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,007
Default Cheap intensifiers for popular all sky cameras?

On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 08:37:37 -0700, "W. eWatson"
wrote:

Do you know of a seller for the 2nd and 3rd gen?


Most amateurs get them on eBay.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I Am So Popular G=EMC^2[_2_] Misc 0 April 23rd 12 09:37 PM
NASA goes cheap, cheap, cheap on space Rich[_1_] Amateur Astronomy 2 May 7th 10 08:52 PM
English pigsucking nazis share the giant society with Hitler policecameras, house rules, cameras everywhere. They impose their ways as duringBritish Imperialism and act as pigsucking nazis. CCTV received billions ininvestments to bring cameras in the gb[_3_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 7th 08 03:47 AM
Pseudo-military and cameras in the streets in the UK, imperialistcrowd, big important public and the public militia, radical extremism of today(news story on UK cameras in the streets) gb[_3_] Astronomy Misc 0 May 12th 08 04:24 PM
The name Rolex is a very popular name in the wristwatch scene. Rolexis known pretty well for its good quality. Rolex became popular duringwartimes, and continues to be to this day. The company was not always known asThe Rolex Watch Company, Ltd., but [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 0 April 19th 08 10:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.