|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Envirokooks beware, THIS is what will power spacecraft, not uselesssolar panels
Solar panels are fine for near-Earth operations on a small scale where
their miniscule amounts of power can be used, but not for deeper space exploration. BBC: 12 September 2012 Last updated at 12:00 ET Nuclear space batteries could boost Sellafield jobs Up to 50 jobs could be created at Sellafield in the development of nuclear batteries to power spacecraft. Chemists at Britain's National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) plan to make the batteries using Sellafield's large store of waste plutonium. The batteries could then be used as a power supply for the European Space Agency's (Esa) spacecraft. As well as the new jobs, this project could accrue significant UK multi-million pound exports. In 2009, Esa funded a pilot project to examine the cost and practicality of establishing a European source of material for Radioactive Power Sources (RPS). RPSs are ultra-long life batteries for use in the Esa's deep space programme. The RPS batteries are not to launch the spacecraft, but to keep instruments running over several decades. Tim Tinsley, programme manager for NNL, said: "We're more than half way through the £1m pilot proving the viability of being able to extract the isotope [chemical element] from the civil plutonium stockpiles. "We have a quantity of this plutonium at our labs at the Sellafield site and a team of highly experienced chemists are 'proving' the chemical flow-sheet for the process." Export potential Currently, Esa uses an isotope called plutonium-238 for these batteries, but this is only available from Russia and America. It is also only available from military reactors, and supplies could run out in about 2018. This would mean the isotope being extracted at Sellafield - called americium-241 - could not only be used in Esa's projects, but would also open the door for an even greater multi-million pound export potential to countries currently reliant on plutonium-238. Mr Tinsley said: "Technically, there are no barriers to the success of the project, it would be down to funding and politics within Europe and they are already tightly constrained. "Esa needs this fuel source for their space 'road-map' - they cannot do it without it and we at NNL are doing everything we can to make that a success." But deep space exploration is only one use for the isotope that is being explored. "There'll always be domestic applications that require a power source for a 20 or 30-year duration in inaccessible locations such as deep sea or deep underground in oil wells," added Mr Tinsley. In November, Esa will decide whether or not to continue the funding. If funding is ratified, Mr Tinsley suggests that jobs could start being created steadily from 2014 to a point of full production around 2020. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Envirokooks beware, THIS is what will power spacecraft, notuseless solar panels
On Sep 13, 12:20*pm, "$27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto"
wrote: Solar panels are fine for near-Earth operations on a small scale where their miniscule amounts of power can be used, but not for deeper space exploration. BBC: *12 September 2012 Last updated at 12:00 ET Nuclear space batteries could boost Sellafield jobs Up to 50 jobs could be created at Sellafield in the development of nuclear batteries to power spacecraft. Chemists at Britain's National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) plan to make the batteries using Sellafield's large store of waste plutonium. The batteries could then be used as a power supply for the European Space Agency's (Esa) spacecraft. As well as the new jobs, this project could accrue significant UK multi-million pound exports. In 2009, Esa funded a pilot project to examine the cost and practicality of establishing a European source of material for Radioactive Power Sources (RPS). RPSs are ultra-long life batteries for use in the Esa's deep space programme. The RPS batteries are not to launch the spacecraft, but to keep instruments running over several decades. Tim Tinsley, programme manager for NNL, said: "We're more than half way through the £1m pilot proving the viability of being able to extract the isotope [chemical element] from the civil plutonium stockpiles. "We have a quantity of this plutonium at our labs at the Sellafield site and a team of highly experienced chemists are 'proving' the chemical flow-sheet for the process." Export potential Currently, Esa uses an isotope called plutonium-238 for these batteries, but this is only available from Russia and America. It is also only available from military reactors, and supplies could run out in about 2018. This would mean the isotope being extracted at Sellafield - called americium-241 - could not only be used in Esa's projects, but would also open the door for an even greater multi-million pound export potential to countries currently reliant on plutonium-238. Mr Tinsley said: "Technically, there are no barriers to the success of the project, it would be down to funding and politics within Europe and they are already tightly constrained. "Esa needs this fuel source for their space 'road-map' - they cannot do it without it and we at NNL are doing everything we can to make that a success." But deep space exploration is only one use for the isotope that is being explored. "There'll always be domestic applications that require a power source for a 20 or 30-year duration in inaccessible locations such as deep sea or deep underground in oil wells," added Mr Tinsley. In November, Esa will decide whether or not to continue the funding. If funding is ratified, Mr Tinsley suggests that jobs could start being created steadily from 2014 to a point of full production around 2020. At 20+% thermal-dynamic conversion efficiency, those nuclear batteries could prove quite invaluable to all sorts of deep space as well as terrestrial applications. Most RPS or RTGs are currently operating at far less than 10%, so there's plenty of room for their improvements and overall cost reductions. RPS or RTGs like operating in as cold of environment as possible, so that those deeper space explorations are going to be well suited, but we still need to get them deployed and on location much faster, because most of us alive today will not survive long enough to ever realize their benefits. http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus” |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rosetta, what a waste! (Solar power = hobble the spacecraft) | Rich[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | September 4th 11 06:33 PM |
Left-wing envirokooks better not oppose this | Rich[_4_] | Amateur Astronomy | 72 | December 11th 10 12:27 PM |
No worthless, awkward, greenie, P.C. solar panels to power this craft | Rich[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 20th 09 06:47 PM |
AC & DC power sources in Apollo spacecraft | DaveDeWolfe | History | 10 | January 4th 05 07:42 PM |
System to monitor heat panels could safeguard future spacecraft (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 15th 04 06:14 PM |