|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
an open letter to Pete
NASA, or any government agency, can not and should not
be involved in developing improved commercial launch systems. This is a job solely for private enterprise and cannot adequately be done otherwise. The more the government meddles, and fails, in this, the longer it keeps the dynamism and innovation of commercial enterprise away from the endeavor, and the longer the development of innovative and efficient launch vehicles is put off into the future. Government programs have often played a role in advancing technologies. But rarely is the product of government funded development suitable for commercial use unmodified. Even rarer still is for such beasts to be particularly cost effective. Precisely because costs are less important to hyper-funded governments of fully industrialized states. In all the areas where government funded research and development (such as, say, jet aircraft) played a major role it has always been continued commercial development which brought the major breakthroughs in cost. Governments don't do cost breakthrough developments, they do capabilities breakthrough developments, because that's what they need. The simple fact is that if the US government wants to send people to Mars at the cost of 10, 20, 100, or 500 billion dollars, they can do it. And to a large extent the cost is less of a concern than the political will to just get it done. The US government is an easy target to look to as a source for the evolution of launch vehicles, because it has lots of money and is a single entity. And precisely because of its money it has the ability to get things done when it wants things done. Compared to the nebulous, difficult to define, impossible to quantify, and even harder to predict process of free market investment and development, the government is the obvious "go to guy" for any major undertaking, including making spaceflight cheaper. But in this case they have almost no ability to actually do it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
an open letter to Pete
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
an open letter to Pete
"Tony Rusi" wrote in message om... Tom, What do you think of Skull and Bones? --PLONK-- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
O'Keefe OSP Letter to Congressman Boehlert | ed kyle | Space Shuttle | 3 | October 31st 03 06:24 PM |
Ed Lu letter from space #last letter | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | October 29th 03 06:28 PM |
NASA IG issues letter to NASA administrator regarding observations on the independence of the Columbia accident investigation Board | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 16th 03 12:21 PM |
NASA IG issues letter to NASA administrator regarding observations on the independence of the Columbia accident investigation Board | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | August 16th 03 12:21 PM |
Columbia Investigators Fire Foam Insulation at Shuttle Wing, Blowing Open 2-Foot Hole; The crowd of about 100 gasped and cried, "Wow!" when the foam hit. | Jay | Space Shuttle | 32 | July 12th 03 02:41 AM |