A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

an open letter to Pete



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 21st 04, 06:22 AM
Christopher M. Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default an open letter to Pete

NASA, or any government agency, can not and should not
be involved in developing improved commercial launch
systems. This is a job solely for private enterprise
and cannot adequately be done otherwise. The more
the government meddles, and fails, in this, the
longer it keeps the dynamism and innovation of
commercial enterprise away from the endeavor, and
the longer the development of innovative and
efficient launch vehicles is put off into the
future.

Government programs have often played a role in
advancing technologies. But rarely is the product
of government funded development suitable for
commercial use unmodified. Even rarer still is
for such beasts to be particularly cost effective.
Precisely because costs are less important to
hyper-funded governments of fully industrialized
states. In all the areas where government funded
research and development (such as, say, jet
aircraft) played a major role it has always been
continued commercial development which brought
the major breakthroughs in cost. Governments
don't do cost breakthrough developments, they do
capabilities breakthrough developments, because
that's what they need. The simple fact is that if
the US government wants to send people to Mars at
the cost of 10, 20, 100, or 500 billion dollars,
they can do it. And to a large extent the cost is
less of a concern than the political will to just
get it done.

The US government is an easy target to look to as a
source for the evolution of launch vehicles, because
it has lots of money and is a single entity. And
precisely because of its money it has the ability to
get things done when it wants things done. Compared
to the nebulous, difficult to define, impossible to
quantify, and even harder to predict process of free
market investment and development, the government is
the obvious "go to guy" for any major undertaking,
including making spaceflight cheaper. But in this
case they have almost no ability to actually do it.
  #3  
Old February 22nd 04, 09:56 AM
Chosp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default an open letter to Pete


"Tony Rusi" wrote in message
om...
Tom,

What do you think of Skull and Bones?




--PLONK--


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
O'Keefe OSP Letter to Congressman Boehlert ed kyle Space Shuttle 3 October 31st 03 06:24 PM
Ed Lu letter from space #last letter Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 October 29th 03 06:28 PM
NASA IG issues letter to NASA administrator regarding observations on the independence of the Columbia accident investigation Board Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 0 August 16th 03 12:21 PM
NASA IG issues letter to NASA administrator regarding observations on the independence of the Columbia accident investigation Board Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 August 16th 03 12:21 PM
Columbia Investigators Fire Foam Insulation at Shuttle Wing, Blowing Open 2-Foot Hole; The crowd of about 100 gasped and cried, "Wow!" when the foam hit. Jay Space Shuttle 32 July 12th 03 02:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.